+Vigano on X:

https://twitter.com/CarloMVigano/status/1727384813437382951


"On December 15, 2021, almost two years ago, Prof. Roberto De Mattei published in Corrispondenza Romana an article by pediatrician Gwyneth A. Spaeder with which she allegedly wanted to refute my statements about the "vaccine" for Covid19 contained in the letter I had sent to the American Bishops and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith the previous October 23.

In my letter I wrote: "With each passing day, thousands of people die or have their health affected by the illusion that so-called vaccines can guarantee a solution to the pandemic emergency. The Catholic Church has the duty before God and all humanity to denounce in the strongest terms this tremendous and horrible crime, giving clear indications and taking a stand against those who, in the name of a pseudoscience subservient to the interests of pharmaceutical companies and the globalist elite, have only intentions of death" (https://aldomariavalli.it/2021/10/26/monsignor-vigano-lettera-con-alcune-gravi-considerazioni-relative-ai-cosiddetti-vaccini-contro-il-covid-19/...).

Replied Spaeder: "Catholics have no reason, however, to fear the safety, efficacy or morality of COVID mRNA vaccines. These vaccines should serve as an example of how dedicated medical professionals can use their God-given talents to help end the immense suffering caused by this virus" (https://corrispondenzaromana.it/author/gwyneth-a-spaeder/... ).

Prof. Massimo Citro della Riva, who had responded on my behalf to Dr. Spaeder in a scientifically unimpeachable manner (https://aldomariavalli.it/2021/12/28/monsignor-vigano-e-massimo-citro-risposta-allarticolo-di-gwyneth-a-spaeder/...), was on that occasion the subject of ad personam criticism by the very venomous pen of "Emanuele Barbieri" of Corrispondenza Romana (https://corrispondenzaromana.it/chi-e-il-dott-massimo-citro-della-riva/... - later retracting with a note from the Editorial Staff: https://corrispondenzaromana.it/precisazione-articolo-sul-dott-massimo-citro/...).

After Pfizer's admissions to the European Parliament, in recent weeks even the EMA has officially declared that the experimental gene serum (whose recently updated bugiardini report a disturbing list of even serious and lethal adverse effects) does not ensure any protection from Covid19 infection (https://x.com/madforfree/status/1727216240542855507...), contradicting what was previously stated by the mainstream and De Mattei's own news agency.

Not only that: there is evidence that in the gene serums imposed by governments enslaved to the WHO and sponsored by Bergoglio himself - a testimonial of the pharmaceutical companies - there is plasmid contamination with the SV40 virus that, according to some scientists such as Dr. Peter McCullough, is at the origin of turbocancer (see https://renovatio21.com/la-contaminαzιone-del-dna-plasmidico-nei-vaccini-covid-19-e-una-chiara-violazione-del-consenso-informato-da-parte-della-fda-dr-malone/... ).

I wrote then to De Mattei, "Those who are familiar and assiduous with my writings know well that I am not in the habit of making unproven claims or taking positions on controversial issues without thoroughly docuмenting myself."

Today my assertions of two years ago are entirely confirmed by indisputable official sources, while the arguments of Prof. De Mattei and his overseas advisors (not immune from conflicts of interest, as pointed out by Jules Gomes: http://churchmilitant.com/news/article/big-pharma-stooge-smears-pro-life-prelate...) prove to be nothing more than an embarrassing public office defense of BigPharma.

I want to hope that the recklessness with which the Director of Corrispondenza Romana has ventured into dealing with complex issues in the scientific sphere is not the same as that with which he intends to deal with topics in the ecclesiastical sphere today (https://corrispondenzaromana.it/i-vescovi-strickland-schneider-e-vigano-alcuni-punti-fermi1-parte/...), thereby defeating the merits of the author of "Ecuмenical Vatican Council II. A History Never Written."

They may be due, but I think we all know we'll never get them. 

Just had Thanksgiving with a friend who got the jab and works in an oncology lab.  I asked her if she's seen an increase in cancer, and she said she had.  When I asked her why she thought so, she responded with a couple of reasons:  people held off on screenings during COVID and that they have increased new screenings since COVID. 

Not a mention of the jab.  Hello? I think the jab has affected these peoples' brains as well.

Ha-ha!

Yes, people have been addled by the continuous propaganda, either excusing the serum from all detriments, or conversely, blaming it for all ills.

As an example of the latter, I was up deer hunting near the Canadian border a couple weeks ago, and one of the neighboring landowners stopped by, bemoaning the low deer numbers this year.  I said, “Yeah, they really need to get the wolf and cougar problem under control,” to which he responded, “Well, I think the real problem is that they’re all dying of covid.”

He can’t be that stupid, can he? 

They may be due, but I think we all know we'll never get them. 

Just had Thanksgiving with a friend who got the jab and works in an oncology lab.  I asked her if she's seen an increase in cancer, and she said she had.  When I asked her why she thought so, she responded with a couple of reasons:  people held off on screenings during COVID and that they have increased new screenings since COVID. 

Not a mention of the jab.  Hello? I think the jab has affected these peoples' brains as well.

Just found out that one of the folks at Thanksgiving dinner has COVID.  Good thing she got jabbed.  We had better not get it.  😠

Replied Spaeder: "Catholics have no reason, however, to fear the safety, efficacy or morality of COVID mRNA vaccines. 

A paediatrician contradicting a prelate of the Church on a matter of morality. The gall!

Regarding safety, already back in June of 2021 there was a massive European study published in the online journal Vaccines, "The Safety of COVID-19 Vaccinations - We Should Rethink the Policy" which concluded that "for three deaths prevented by the vaccine we must accept two deaths inflicted by the vaccine". This study was promoted by Medscape. Lo and behold, eight days later it was retracted after some members of the editorial board spat the dummy. The only reason given for the retraction was basically that post hoc ergo propter hoc does not imply causation. Yet apparently it does for a COVID death! The authors of the paper were refused right of reply...
Article: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/9/7/693 Retraction: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/9/7/729

It’s such a blessing when our pro jab - pro sodomite family no longer invites us to Thanksgiving which to them is Indigenous pagan day.  No more drama. 

We shouldn’t eat and drink with non believers. 

Which is why I spent Thanksgiving with my dogs and cat! 🐶 🐶 🐱 😋 🦃