Author Topic: Any evidence of Bp Fellay in Roman Rota? (Read 1313 times)

Maria Auxiliadora · « **Reply #5 on:** February 15, 2026, 08:36:47 PM »

I found This:

Quote

https://gloria.tv/post/UQSBkni1bnxe32f4NhJHwXocM

Pope Francis Has Fully Regularized the SSPX - James Bogle
Aug 5, 2019

Pope Francis has fully regularized the Society of St Pius X (SSPX), James Bogle, the ex-president of Una Voce International, told Gloria.tv (video below).

Bogle stressed that the SSPX and the sacraments administrated by them, including marriages and confessions, have been formally recognized by Francis. The Society is also allowed to ordain to the priesthood whomever they see fit.

Francis further appointed SSPX Bishop Bernard Fellay as a judge at the Rota Romana, the highest appellate tribunal of the Church, thus recognizing his authority.

"I don't see how much more regular you can get than that," Bogle concludes. He acknowledges, however, that there are a lot of intolerant bishops who still treat the SSPX as if it were irregular.

To them, Bogle answers that those who do not like the integration of the SSPX "better have the argument with Pope Francis."

Maria Auxiliadora · « **Reply #6 on:** February 15, 2026, 08:57:41 PM »

Here is the comment I mentioned from the article:

Quote

https://gloria.tv/post/UQSBkni1bnxe32f4NhJHwXocM
Ray Sunshine's quote of Mr. Bogle exactly what I heard in the video interview:

Aug 18, 2019
Ray Sunshine
Bishop Fellay told me himself in May 2015 and I confirmed it with the Rota.
You seem to be saying here that Bishop Fellay has now been one of the judges ("Uditori") of the Rota Romana for over four years. Have I understood you correctly?

Oct 18, 2019
James Bogle
No. He has been appointed by Pope Francis a first instance tribunal judge to handle SSPX cases. The very great significance of this is that it means the Pope recognises SSPX marriages since, if he did not, he could not appoint Bishop Fellay (or anyone) to preside, as a judge, over SSPX matrimonial cases. If the marriages were never valid in the first place then there would

Twice dyed · « **Reply #7 on:** February 15, 2026, 09:20:04 PM »

Sorry if there is an overlap..but for the sake of the timeline:

https://gloria.tv/post/UQSBkni1bnxe32f4NhJHwXocM/replies

Aug 5, 2019
Pope Francis Has Fully Regularized the SSPX - James Bogle
Pope Francis has fully regularized the Society of St Pius X (SSPX), James Bogle, the ex-president of Una Voce International, told Gloria.tv (video below).
Bogle stressed that the SSPX and the sacraments administrated by them, including marriages and confessions, have been formally recognized by Francis. The Society is also allowed to ordain to the priesthood whomever they see fit.
Francis further appointed SSPX Bishop Bernard Fellay as a judge at the Rota Romana, the highest appellate tribunal of the Church, thus recognizing his authority.
"I don't see how much more regular you can get than that," Bogle concludes. He acknowledges, however, that there are a lot of intolerant bishops who still treat the SSPX as if it were irregular.
To them, Bogle answers that those who do not like the integration of the SSPX "better have the argument with Pope Francis."
#newsDoikpjaqer

James Bogle
Aug 6, 2019
Bishop Fellay told me himself in May 2015 and I confirmed it with the CDF. SSPX has not chosen to publicise it doubtless because of those who would use it merely to disparage.

James Bogle
Oct 18, 2019
No. He has been appointed by Pope Francis a first instance tribunal judge to handle SSPX cases. The very great significance of this is that it means the Pope recognises SSPX marriages since, if he did not, he could not appoint Bishop Fellay (or anyone) to preside, as a judge, over SSPX matrimonial cases. If the marriages were never valid in the first place then there would be nothing to judge or annul.

James Bogle
Mar 17, 2021
No need to be sorry - it is a complex subject often unnecessarily obfuscated by prelates with secondary motives. The docuмents issued by Pope Francis recognising SSPX confessions, and appointing Bishop Fellay a judge legally imply regularization when added to the still valid docuмent formally establishing the Society in 1970. So - there are docuмents but one does not legally require a docuмent to state - baldly - "you are regularised" for that nevertheless to be the case. The other pontifical docuмents already imply it...

___________________

Maria Auxiliadora · « **Reply #8 on:** February 15, 2026, 10:10:14 PM »

It is interesting that Bishop Fellay told Mr. Bogle he was a judge of the Roman Rota in "May 2015" because the SSPX was regularized "In Argentina" April 13, 2015, just the month before. According to the Legal analysis by the Argentinian lawyer, it is impossible to be regularized in Argentina and not in the rest of the world and that it would have required the signature of Menzingen. We also know from the multiple statements from the Vatican Cardinals that "regularization" could not be done without the signing of the "Doctrinal Preamble" rejected by ABL which consists of the new (JPII's) "Profession of faith and the Oath of Fidelity to the Pope".

That has to be another secret of +Fellay that involves the Argentinian members (+de Galarreta, Fr. Bouchacourt and Fr. Pagliarani) who had to be familiar with Argentinian Law because they were either Argentinian or resided there for a long time. The same trio that became the new leadership ratified by Rome and friendly with Bergoglio as AB of Buenos Aires.

It is time for SSPX members to ask +Fellay, When did you sign the "Doctrinal Preamble? And demand an answer. After all, he Kept
GREC secret for a long time.

Giovanni Berto · « **Reply #9 on:** February 16, 2026, 12:04:56 AM »

Now that I think of it, this whole consecration drama might be just the right occasion for them to become officially and explicitly recognized by the Modernists.

Publicizing the deal with a cartoonish ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ such as Tucho will be the icing on the cake.

CathInfo.com

Author Topic: Any evidence of Bp Fellay in Roman Rota? (Read 1313 times)

Maria Auxiliadora

Re: Any evidence of Bp Fellay in Roman Rota?

Maria Auxiliadora

Re: Any evidence of Bp Fellay in Roman Rota?

Twice dyed

Re:James Bogle, Gloria TV, Any evidence of Bp Fellay in Roman Rota?

Maria Auxiliadora

Re: Any evidence of Bp Fellay in Roman Rota?

Giovanni Berto

Re: Any evidence of Bp Fellay in Roman Rota?