From Fr. Chazal --
---------------------------------------------------------------

Bishop Fellay as an assessor in the Roman Rota
In my conversation with Dr Dollera, i mentioned bishop Fellay as a member of the Roman rotten Rota.
How can we prove that?
If it is true, it means they are more involved with the novus ordo than before, and this whole Kabuki theater with Fernandez is just that.
You can perhaps ask the forum what proof there is. It would be useful.
In Iesu et Maria,
Fc+

+fellay admits this on video, see beginning of this clip, he states "the congregation of the faith appoints me as judge"

In video description says: See also : "Vatican confirms appointment of Bp. Fellay to judge SSPX priests" : https://web.archive.org/web/20150804071437/https://vaticaninsider.lastampa.it/en/the-vatican/detail/articolo/lefebvriani-lefebvrians-lefebvrianos-41514/

It was common knowledge in 2015:
Excerpt:

• CatholicCulture.org

Vatican names Bishop Fellay to hear canonical charge against SSPX priest, despite bishop's suspension

June 04, 2015
Bishop Bernard Fellay, the head(...) Society of St. Pius X (SSPX), reports that he has been appointed by the Vatican as judge in the canonical trial of an SSPX priest.
Bishop Fellay observed that the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, which handles serious accusations against clerics, named him to hear the case although he is suspended from active ministry and the Vatican does not recognize the SSPX. It is “a beautiful contradiction indeed,” he said.

  The Vatican’s decision to give Bishop Fellay canonical jurisdiction in the case could also be seen as a sign that the Holy See continues to hope for reconciliation of the SSPX. Archbishop Guido Pozzo, the secretary of the Ecclesia Dei commission, told Vatican Insider: “I see no contradiction here, but rather a step toward reconciliation.”

Fr. Matthew Salenave would know first hand if +F has that faculty from Rome...He was tried by some type of judges from neoSSPX .  They used the 1983 Code ie. condemn without proof required.

***************

And when in 2024 AD. they send a priest to the Golden Prison, well, isn't that approved by Rome too? Interesting question.

https://www.cathinfo.com/members-only/neosspx-condemns-a-priest-to-golden-prison-july-2024-a-d/msg974017/#msg974017
( I could probably find that link / reference if you really need it)
*******************

https://www.cath.ch/newsf/le-vatican-mandate-mgr-fellay-pour-juger-un-pretre-lefebvriste/
Vatican mandates Bishop Fellay to judge lefebvrist priest.

AI translation: unofficial

Rome, June 5, 2015 (Apic) The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) has mandated Bishop Bernard Fellay, Superior of the Schismatic Fraternity St-Pie-X (FSSPX), a trial judge for the trial of a lefebvrist priest accused of serious crime.
Bishop Fellay himself announced the news, during a sermon in California, last May, reports on June 3, 2015 the website “Vatican Insider”. The Valais bishop presented the fact as an example of the Holy See’s “contradictions” regarding his relations with the Separate Brotherhood of Rome since 1988.

______________

Note Vatican Insider  web didn't work for me.

St Pius X, pray for us.

I found This:

https://gloria.tv/post/UQSBkni1bnxe32f4NhJHwXocM

Pope Francis Has Fully Regularized the SSPX - James Bogle
Aug 5, 2019

Pope Francis has fully regularized the Society of St Pius X (SSPX), James Bogle, the ex-president of Una Voce International, told Gloria.tv (video below).

Bogle stressed that the SSPX and the sacraments administrated by them, including marriages and confessions, have been formally recognized by Francis. The Society is also allowed to ordain to the priesthood whomever they see fit.

Francis further appointed SSPX Bishop Bernard Fellay as a judge at the Rota Romana, the highest appellate tribunal of the Church, thus recognizing his authority.

"I don't see how much more regular you can get than that," Bogle concludes. He acknowledges, however, that there are a lot of intolerant bishops who still treat the SSPX as if it were irregular.

To them, Bogle answers that those who do not like the integration of the SSPX "better have the argument with Pope Francis."

Sorry if there is an overlap..but for the sake of the timeline:

https://gloria.tv/post/UQSBkni1bnxe32f4NhJHwXocM/replies

Aug 5, 2019
Pope Francis Has Fully Regularized the SSPX - James Bogle
Pope Francis has fully regularized the Society of St Pius X (SSPX), James Bogle, the ex-president of Una Voce International, told Gloria.tv (video below).
Bogle stressed that the SSPX and the sacraments administrated by them, including marriages and confessions, have been formally recognized by Francis. The Society is also allowed to ordain to the priesthood whomever they see fit.
Francis further appointed SSPX Bishop Bernard Fellay as a judge at the Rota Romana, the highest appellate tribunal of the Church, thus recognizing his authority.
"I don't see how much more regular you can get than that," Bogle concludes. He acknowledges, however, that there are a lot of intolerant bishops who still treat the SSPX as if it were irregular.
To them, Bogle answers that those who do not like the integration of the SSPX "better have the argument with Pope Francis."
#newsDoikpjaqer

James Bogle
Aug 6, 2019
Bishop Fellay told me himself in May 2015 and I confirmed it with the CDF. SSPX has not chosen to publicise it doubtless because of those who would use it merely to disparage.

James Bogle
Oct 18, 2019
No. He has been appointed by Pope Francis a first instance tribunal judge to handle SSPX cases. The very great significance of this is that it means the Pope recognises SSPX marriages since, if he did not, he could not appoint Bishop Fellay (or anyone) to preside, as a judge, over SSPX matrimonial cases. If the marriages were never valid in the first place then there would be nothing to judge or annul.



James Bogle
Mar 17, 2021
No need to be sorry - it is a complex subject often unnecessarily obfuscated by prelates with secondary motives. The docuмents issued by Pope Francis recognising SSPX confessions, and appointing Bishop Fellay a judge legally imply regularization when added to the still valid docuмent formally establishing the Society in 1970. So - there are docuмents but one does not legally require a docuмent to state - baldly - "you are regularised" for that nevertheless to be the case. The other pontifical docuмents already imply it...

___________________

Now that I think of it, this whole consecration drama might be just the right occasion for them to become officially and explicitly recognized by the Modernists.

Publicizing the deal with a cartoonish ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ such as Tucho will be the icing on the cake.