Author Topic: Anti-Resistance site. (Read 10069 times)

Raphaela · « **Reply #15 on:** January 02, 2013, 06:20:58 PM »

It's a dishonest use of the quote from Chesterton on their website, who's speaking in a different context. There were a lot of anonymous books and pamphlets written by Catholics during the Reformation. They also used false names, as did many of the English priests and martyrs. We're not facing that level of persecution, but we are in danger of being unjustly and publicly refused the sacraments, or of getting priests into trouble with their superiors if they don't refuse us the sacraments.

Catechist99 · « **Reply #16 on:** January 02, 2013, 06:46:13 PM »

Gee....maybe my band will sell more albums now.

Telesphorus · « **Reply #17 on:** January 02, 2013, 06:53:05 PM »

Quote from: Raphaela

It's a dishonest use of the quote from Chesterton on their website, who's speaking in a different context. There were a lot of anonymous books and pamphlets written by Catholics during the Reformation. They also used false names, as did many of the English priests and martyrs. We're not facing that level of persecution, but we are in danger of being unjustly and publicly refused the sacraments, or of getting priests into trouble with their superiors if they don't refuse us the sacraments.

Excessive fondness for Chesterton is a sign of liberalism anyway. Which is what we are dealing with in the neo-SSPX. Nasty liberal-minded people who want to abandon those parts of Church teaching that don't fit their ambitions.

Incredulous · « **Reply #18 on:** January 02, 2013, 06:56:11 PM »

That should be a reminder for us to update and re-post the Bp. Fellay sycophants list.

There are several neo-SSPX members (priests and faithful) who are in cognito or playing it neutral, while attacking the SSPX Resistance.

If they want to play that game, we can give them a run for their money.

SeanJohnson · « **Reply #19 on:** January 02, 2013, 07:09:44 PM »

Quote from: MaterDominici

Quote from: Seraphim
Certainly you will know how to ascertain the identity of those to whom the blog is registered?

It's a privatized registration.

http://www.networksolutions.com/whois-search/againsttheresistance.com

In that case, persons suffering damages from the disclosures of this blog ahould speak with a qualified internet attorney to discern the actionability of such damages.

Should your attorney determine the case is actionable, he may choose to file a "John Doe" subpoena.

A "John Doe" subpoena is used to begin legal action against an unknown defendant.

It is commonly used in Internet cases against forum posters, website administrators, etc to compel revelation of identity.

Once identity is ascertained, the legal action will proceed against the specified individual in their own name.

Disclaimer: I am not an attorney, and this is not legal advice.

SeanJohnson · « **Reply #20 on:** January 02, 2013, 07:30:36 PM »

Quote from: Roland Deschain

http://whois.americaregistry.com/displayWhois.php?zone=againsttheresistance.com

This link gives the IP address as well as the fact that it is registered with godaddy.com and resides on a server in Arizona.

I pulled this from base64online.com

× Ip address info:

97.74.215.115 (97.74.215.115)

× Latitude:

33.6119

× Longitude:

-111.8906

× Country:

United States

× Region:

AZ

× City:

Scottsdale

× Postal code:

85260

× Hostname:

115.215.74.97.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer p3nlh266.shr.prod.phx3.secureserver.net.

× IP decimal:

1632294771

× IP hexadecimal:

0x614ad773

× IP binary:

1100001.1001010.11010111.1110011

× IP octal:

141.112.327.163

Running the latitude/longitude coordinates you posted ought to be able to reveal a physical street address where the server is located, would it not?

Fom that point, things get easier.

Diego · « **Reply #21 on:** January 02, 2013, 07:43:19 PM »

Since the GoDaddy registration is anonymous through DomainsByProxy, interested parties might consider action such as Seraphim suggested.

Catechist99 · « **Reply #22 on:** January 02, 2013, 07:45:58 PM »

Quote from: magdalena

Quote from: Catechist99
Gee....maybe my band will sell more albums now.

Is this from your album? :dancing: :jumping2: :rahrah:

I like it! But it might get you thrown out of your chapel.

:wink:

Hahahaha....no that's not mine. sorry.

parentsfortruth · « **Reply #23 on:** January 02, 2013, 07:54:11 PM »

Wow, what a bunch of ignorance!

Let me tell you something, whoever is running that disgusting excuse for a website.

IF A TRADITIONAL CATHOLIC WOULD WANT MY NAME, I WOULD GIVE IT TO THEM! I DON'T WANT EVERY TOM, DICK, AND HARRY ON THE WEB KNOWING MY REAL NAME, THEREFORE, I USE AN ALIAS. I AM NOT AFRAID TO GIVE MY REAL NAME TO ACTUAL PEOPLE THAT HAVE AN INTEREST IN WHAT I SAY, BUT I HAVE SOMETHING CALLED A HANDLE (parentsfortruth) THAT I USE, SO THAT SOME RANDOM IDIOT FROM THE INTERNET CAN'T STALK ME.

Perhaps this concept is too much for you to grasp. If that is the case, I'm very sorry that you are not using the intellect God gave you to make such a deduction on your own, and subsequently reveal someone's real name to the entire world. Even if I knew you were trying to get my real name so you could tell others who I am in real life to a place local, or even exclusively to the traditional Catholic community, I would have absolutely NO PROBLEM giving you my real name to let people know who I am. BUT TO PLASTER MY REAL NAME ALL OVER THE INTERNET FOR EVERYONE TO SEE IS A BETRAYAL OF PRIVACY AND ABSOLUTELY WRONG. YOU SHOULD BE ASHAMED!

parentsfortruth · « **Reply #24 on:** January 02, 2013, 07:58:28 PM »

Quote from: Raphaela

It's a dishonest use of the quote from Chesterton on their website, who's speaking in a different context. There were a lot of anonymous books and pamphlets written by Catholics during the Reformation. They also used false names, as did many of the English priests and martyrs. We're not facing that level of persecution, but we are in danger of being unjustly and publicly refused the sacraments, or of getting priests into trouble with their superiors if they don't refuse us the sacraments.

Yes, Chesterton here was talking about evil men that were trying to hurl blasphemies against the Catholic Faith with no repercussions. What the "resistance" is doing is DISAGREEING with the lean of the current SSPX, which is NOT an attack on the Catholic Faith, but a way of DEFENDING IT!

magdalena · « **Reply #25 on:** January 02, 2013, 08:03:48 PM »

Quote from: Catechist99

Quote from: magdalena
Quote from: Catechist99
Gee....maybe my band will sell more albums now.

Is this from your album? :dancing: :jumping2: :rahrah:

I like it! But it might get you thrown out of your chapel.

:wink:

Hahahaha....no that's not mine. sorry.

Didn't think so. No apologies necessary. :smile:

SeanJohnson · « **Reply #26 on:** January 02, 2013, 09:05:02 PM »

From "Tradical" at IA:

I agree that it is most likely 'James'.

What a stupid thing to do.

I disagree that it is a 'fαℓѕє fℓαg', doing some checking it was fairly easy to make some of the links. These are the 'low hanging' fruit who included specific identification in their posts - such as phone numbers.

Such a stupid and harmful thing to do.

Also, even the 'resistence' websites seem (from the ones I've come across) beter organized.

This post has been edited by tradical on Jan 3 2013, 02:52 AM

tradicat.blogspot.ca

Seeking A Way Forward: A Catholic Traditionalist's Thoughts and Reflections on ways to help the Church emerge from this crisis of Faith

Marlelar · « **Reply #27 on:** January 02, 2013, 09:40:21 PM »

Quote from: Roland Deschain

http://whois.americaregistry.com/displayWhois.php?zone=againsttheresistance.com

This link gives the IP address as well as the fact that it is registered with godaddy.com and resides on a server in Arizona.

GoDaddy has their corporate office in AZ so I assume their servers are there also. That would have nothing to do with the location of the person(s) who own or operate the website.

Marsha

Hobbledehoy · « **Reply #28 on:** January 02, 2013, 09:48:12 PM »

Quote

Here it is.

Wow!

Can you say: T-E-R-R-O-R-I-S-M!?

This is just disgusting.

I pray legal action will follow soon.

People, if you allow this to happen now, enabling it by apathy or surrender, it will just snow-ball into more and more terrorism and worse forms thereof.

Humility and meekness does become a servant of Jesus and Mary, but not pusillanimity nor a faith vitiated by cult-tactics or Stockholm Syndrome psychoses.

This is not the Catholic faith you want your children to learn and their children to learn.

sspxbvm · « **Reply #29 on:** January 02, 2013, 09:53:46 PM »

Quote from: Seraphim

From "Tradical" at IA:

I agree that it is most likely 'James'.

What a stupid thing to do.

I disagree that it is a 'fαℓѕє fℓαg', doing some checking it was fairly easy to make some of the links. These are the 'low hanging' fruit who included specific identification in their posts - such as phone numbers.

Such a stupid and harmful thing to do.

Also, even the 'resistence' websites seem (from the ones I've come across) beter organized.

This post has been edited by tradical on Jan 3 2013, 02:52 AM

tradicat.blogspot.ca

Seeking A Way Forward: A Catholic Traditionalist's Thoughts and Reflections on ways to help the Church emerge from this crisis of Faith

A "James" website, perhaps, but he wouldn't have known the screen name. It's an organized effort between neo-sspx elite and employees. Some of whom we know. Wow, what a mistake! Poor souls