Neil Obstat,
You are such a waffler !
First, what I found very interesting is that in two weeks I've had no more posts on this topic,
Newsflash: this is an Internet forum. Any member can pick out posts in the past, even several years ago, and make comments on them. I happened to see that one post of hugeman deserved a reply. He has been posting some very interesting things lately. But you wouldn't know about that, even when I'm telling you now.
So, you were hoping that your inane and fallacious opening post would be forgotten once it was exposed for the nonsense that it was, were you? And since I posted a reply your worst nightmares were awakened, were they? You still haven't answered the question, who your source was. "A decent SSPX priest" could be any one of hundreds. Such a priest could be very decent and still be ignorant, but you don't have that excuse, because you have the facts in front of your face. Invite the priest to come here and you send me his ID by PM and I absolutely promise that I will not expose him. I have never broken this promise and I'm not going to start now. Several good priests have trusted me with their identity so it's nothing new.
They are at risk when they are under the thumb of the Menzingen-denizens.
but all of a sudden there is Neil Obstat, the day after I told him off for his poor behaviour, to which he had no other reply than to 'hit and run'.
Are you a troll, Nobody? You sure are acting like one. You're incapable of "telling me off," because that's impossible for you or for any other troll like you.
Second, your waffling again is full of holes and confusion. Do I really need to take the time to point them out to you ? Is there such a thing as 'invincible confusion' ?
That would be a first.
Third, the only time you say something constructive and sensible is when you do a 'cut and paste' of someone else's writing. Luckily, that covers about 90% of your posts. Maybe that is why you got away for so long with your poor behaviour.
More Passion Week fantasy from Nobody? Why am I not surprised? You're lying. The VAST majority of what I post is my OWN composition, but then you wouldn't be capable of imagining that could be true. But I can prove it. Find, for example where I have copied this post right here, Nobody the troll. Liar.
And lastly, these arguments were given by a decent SSPX priest, and yes, not all SSPX priests are fools/blind/cowards/.. unlike what one could conclude from your posts. This particular priest is very close to seeing the light.
Maybe you should ask this priest to read my posts and the Recusant and a few other threads on CI and he would see the light a lot better. Or, are you talking about some other light? More ambiguity from the lying troll, Nobody?
Yet, if we all were to speak and act like 'humble and charitable Neil Obstat', there would be no more laity and priests that would even want to consider joining the Resistance. You can't catch flies with vinegar.
Was Our Lord catching flies with vinegar when he drove the money changers out of the Temple? Hmmmm??
If these people come up with arguments, then the least we can do is give some objective answers.
You wouldn't know an objective answer if it bit you on the ankle. The reply by hugeman put you squarely in your place, along with the ignorance at best and objective deception at worst, of your source, whom you are so wimpy so as not to mention.
Coward.
Your answers only say 'how stupid, how contradictory, how confusing, ..' but they give NO objective arguments.
Really? My answers only say what a woman always says, always or never. Typical woman. I hope you remember your objective calumny and obvious lies when you go to confession, that is, if you ever go.
You remind me of Fr Gleize. Why ? Where the Archbishop needed only two sentences in his 1974 Declaration to express clearly the Truth about Rome, Fr Gleize needed several pages in his first attempt, and them another couple of pages to 'explain' his first attempt. And even then there were holes and black spots in it. If Fr Gleize can be called a confused wafller, what does it make you ?
More nonsense from the peanut gallery. Go back to the kitchen where you belong.
Are you one of those infiltrators that actually wants to make the Resistance look ridiculous, endless arguers and nit pickers ?
And you are the one that called me 'woman' and considered yourself a big boy ?
Don't you know how to read posts yet? Can't you see what I've posted? Oh, right, you're not capable. Sorry, I forgot. My mistake.
Big boys say what they have to say, short and sweet and to the point. Generally speaking sins of the tongue are a womans weakness. You certainly take the cake !
You've taken the cake and eaten it too. So there's none left for you to share.
.