Neil Obstat, I appreciate the effort and your hard work on this forum. Thank you.
You're welcome. I hope someone can benefit from my ramblings. I want to post
them somewhere, and CI is just about the only place where I can let off some
steam without being crunched for it :smash-pc:
Here's more on this theme, the similarities between what's going on now with
what went on during Vat.II, which is by the way, contained in the letter at hand
so it's not off-topic..........................
Sent: Sunday, 16 September 2012 10:47 PM
Subject: Problem SSPX now
Dear Mrs. XXXXX,
The problem with the neo-SSPX is twofold: 1. A doctrinal neo-modernist shift, or doctrinal slide, combined with a consequent moral slide so that SSPX teaching and praxis are now [prevalently] very different than 10 or more years ago, and 2. The determination to agree to be under modernist Rome's authority if modernist Rome meets 3 of the 6 lame conditions of the General Chapter 2012.
In fact, what I have to say pertains to the entire letter, not just the opening
paragraph, in principle.....................
(BTW: those of you bent on whining over "leaked" documents can forget it
this time. THIS IS NOT LEAKED. I WROTE IT. End of story.)The False Friends of Lefebvre
~ The adaptation of the Catholic Church to worldly thinking before, during and
after Vatican II has wrought havoc on the Church in her practice of the Faith,
and seems to have affected her expression of her immutable doctrine.
**Regarding the SSPX today, this same adaptation is taking place when we
observe +Fellay's new worldliness in accommodating Modernist Rome in many
~ This adaptation of the Church to worldliness boils down to a policy not to
criticize Communism, not to condemn error at large, and to rely instead on
"the infinite mercy of God" as announced in John XXIII's opening speech of
October 11th, 1962 -- the "Golden Jubilee" of which will be celebrated in Rome
in only 3 weeks' time from NOW, Sept. 19th, 2012.
** Regarding the SSPX today, this same adaptation of the SSPX to the worldliness
of today's NeoRome Vatican boils down to a policy of not criticizing the errors
of Vatican II, literally (read the resolutions of the GC) but only those who promote
them. This is a soft-boiled boil-down, but a boil-down nonetheless. The SSPX
would attempt to go into Rome and rub shoulders with the heretic Modernists and
thus "convert" them from good example, or whatever. Nonsense.
~ Those who would not subject themselves to the innovations of Vat.II were
punished immediately with heavy-handed tactics.
** The Menzingen-denizens practice consistent punitive measures against any
SSPX clerics or even faithful, who resist the new ways being promoted.
~ The Conciliar Church, through its SILENCE about the Errors of Russia and
errors of the world at large became an arm of the Soviet state, and of
Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ, and of international Jewry, whose principles it would serve by not
** The Menzingen-denizens, through their enforcement of these new
unannounced, SILENT POLICIES, would become an arm of NewRome, even
without making any kind of overt "deal," or sell-out. Therefore, one must
wonder if no hidden or quasi-private deal has actually been made -- only this
time, NewRome is much too sly to have made it public, much as they attempted
to keep the Vatican-Moscow Agreement hidden, but the news of it leaked out
~ There was a kind of reduction of religious activity to external rites, and the
preaching in churches was curtailed to not criticize Vat.II or the errors of Russia
or even errors at large in the world. A separation was begun whereby one could
believe one thing at Mass on Sunday, but then when he goes home and to work
during the week, he would not have to act according to his Sunday beliefs.
** The Menzingen-denizens dare to preach the Gospel of Jesus at Mass, and
then proceed to enforce their punitive measures against the faithful and strong
priests who resist the accordista agenda, in contradiction to the very Gospel they
had preached on Sunday.
~ The Catholic Church became the Church of Silence, not denouncing
Communism, Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ or Zionist Jewry, but instead promoting a universal
feelgoodism that culminated with Assisi I, II and III. While all the attendees at
these gatherings practiced indifferentism, they were told, "This is not indifferentism."
Christianity behind the Iron Curtain was the Church of Silence.
** It was precisely over the embarrassing news of the +Williamson interview with
the Sweedish journalist that +Fellay seemed to break ranks with the longstanding
practice of teaching the Faith, and the SSPX backed away to become the Society
of Silence on all things "anti-Semitic," the errors of Vat.II, false ecumenism,
religious liberty, and collegiality. We were in the summer of 2009 when these new
policies came to light and were implemented Society-wide, by the iron fist of
~ Priests who would not conform to the NewChurch, by continuing to say the
Canonized Traditional Latin Mass, were expelled, exiled, kicked out, and mocked
openly from the pulpits of the world. It would seem that the CTLM had been
abrogated. But lo, years later B16 would clarify that no, the Mass was never
abrogated --- so that whole charade was a big LIE all along!
** When JPII issued his fake "excommunications" of the 6 bishops in 1988, it would
seem they had been, well, excommunicated. But now we find out that they could
not have been excommunicated for they did not commit any ecclesiastical crime.
So 4 of the 6 were "lifted," which is a HALF-TRUTH, and as we learned in St.
Thomas 101 the other day, "A half truth is a whole lie." All 6 should have been
ANNULLED, if it were to be the truth, and therefore this is a WHOLE LIE. But the
erstwhile Joseph Ratzinger, seminary student, flunked St. Thomas, so we can't
altogether blame his lack of comprehension on him. No, wait, as Obama said so
prolifically, "Yes, We Can!!"
~ The Church of Silence was effectively transformed into an organ of Soviet
Russia, with all the expelled, kicked-out or marginalized clerics replaced with
Modernist sympathizers like Casaroli, Sodano, Wojtyla, Montini, Bertone,
Ratzinger, et. al. Just as in the Council, when it didn't matter what the doctrine
would be, so long as Modernists staffed the important posts in the Council, so
John XXIII had hauled in even the very men who had been under suspicion with
Pius XII, and made them key players at the "Pastoral Council." (It wasn't going
to be a dogmatic council, so these guys wouldn't matter.)
** Once +Fellay had seized power in the SSPX, he systematically replaced all
his District Superiors and otherwise capitulants for the Chapter with yes-men
who would kow-tow to his modernizing whims, whatever they may be. You see,
it didn't matter what the doctrine would be, so long as they would comply like
~The Conciliar Church would not make the necessary Consecration of Russia to
the Immaculate Heart of Mary, but would instead go, "Let's NOT and say that we
DID." So they said that Russia was consecrated, but the word, "Russia," was
never used. So that's another Big Lie.
** As applies to the SSPX, the fabled Rosary Crusades of +Fellay BEGAN with
the overt, excellent intention of the Collegial Consecration of Russia to the
Immaculate Heart of Mary, by the Pope and all the bishops of the world, all at the
same time worldwide. Then what happened? The Church of Silence kicked in,
and before you knew it, no more mention of the Consecration, but rather only
the conversion of Rome, or the lifting of the excoms, or regularization of the
SSPX, or that all our wives might stop having headaches, or whatever it was.
Instead, the pre-arranged lifting of the excoms was trotted out as a "miracle!!"
~ The Church of the Council would no longer condemn error, but instead would
open herself up to the world, in a "positive" presentation of her teaching to "men
of good will," and Paul VI called the result "a veritable invasion of the Church by
** This latest chapter in the Society has yet to be written...................