Author Topic: Analysis of the Rome-SSPX deal - by Fr Cekada (Read 15612 times)

SeanJohnson · « **Reply #40 on:** May 14, 2012, 10:26:24 AM »

Quote from: Anthony M

Once again, looks like your interested in your own views above reality and truth. Learn to think of the Church and not yourself.

Why do you bother to post if you ignore the argument?

I just laid out for you how the command to accept an agreement on the part of Bishop Fellay direcctly contradicts the Faith, as it is an acceptance of doctrinal pluralism.

Let you next post be nothing other than a demonstration of how I am wrong, and we can continue the dialogue.

Anything other than that will be ignored.

JPaul · « **Reply #41 on:** May 14, 2012, 11:11:08 AM »

Quote from: Seraphim

Why do you bother to post if you ignore the argument?

I just laid out for you how the command to accept an agreement on the part of Bishop Fellay direcctly contradicts the Faith, as it is an acceptance of doctrinal pluralism.

Let you next post be nothing other than a demonstration of how I am wrong, and we can continue the dialogue.

Anything other than that will be ignored.

Absolutely! We need to stay on point and not deviate. There has been an almost immediate upswing in threads and posters on this and other forums raising irrelevant issues like this and sedevacantism. It is all meant to distract from the core issue of doctrine. Just as Bishop Fellay's letter ignored answering the doctrinal issue raised by the three, and instead scolded them lie errant schoolchildren, distracting the reader from the central question of heterodox vs orthodox incompatability.
When discussing this subject of an agreement, we should ignore any line of inquiry which clouds or distracts from the central issues of doctrine and the purity of the Faith.

PereJoseph · « **Reply #42 on:** May 14, 2012, 12:33:55 PM »

Quote from: Anthony M

Prove the contrary that it is an acceptance of false pluralism.

Res ipsa loquitur. To join up with Rome under the aegis of being allowed to preach the Traditional doctrines as mere matters of tolerated opinion, while Rome tolerates many heterodox doctrinal theories as like matters of tolerated opinion, is to subjugate Catholic doctrine to the level of open discussion rather than treating them as doctrine as such. No further arguments or inferences need to be drawn; this is a defection from the doctrines of the Church in itself.

Quote

Perejoseph, please get a brain.

Our Lord gave me one so that I might know the Faith He reveals through His Church, love it, and defend it when it is threatened. I try my best.

Quote

Prove what you claim or else if you don’t have anything intelligent to write don’t waste our time!

Which claims in particular do you think require further proofs ?

CathInfo.com

Author Topic: Analysis of the Rome-SSPX deal - by Fr Cekada (Read 15612 times)

SeanJohnson

Analysis of the Rome-SSPX deal - by Fr Cekada

JPaul

Analysis of the Rome-SSPX deal - by Fr Cekada

PereJoseph

Analysis of the Rome-SSPX deal - by Fr Cekada