Author Topic: Analysis of the Rome-SSPX deal - by Fr Cekada (Read 15610 times)

Canute · « **Reply #10 on:** May 11, 2012, 05:43:20 PM »

Quote from: jazzyjeff

I wonder how he finds the time to write these pieces.

Maybe he's vacationing at 'Bishop's Lodge' in New Mexico again and had a spare moment in between his spa treatments.

Typical newbie! You need to be spending more time here to get the real facts.

Father Cekada's CATS were getting spa treatments at Bishops' Lodge in New Mexico, and eating snails flown in from the Goring Hotel in London, because they were blackmailing him over an open investigation by the West Chester police into child and koi fish abuse at SGG (report taken by Sgt Joe Friday), all of which was paid for by the Columbus church building fund.

SJB and other people here can give you details. Welcome to CathInfo! :dancing:

Canute · « **Reply #11 on:** May 11, 2012, 05:56:06 PM »

Quote from: Anthony M

Real issue is this my friends.

Fr. Cekada and the other self appointed popes all feel threatened by this agreement with Rome. Why you might ask? Well, simply because they only exist or stand because of the SSPX and the Archbishop to a great extent. They can reasonably foresee that if all works out well with Rome and the SSPX they might in the future have much of an income and anyone left to pontificate upon.

I think you are wrong on this, because Fr Cekada said somewhere recently that he would PREFER it if the Society made a deal with Rome. His reason was that the difference between the pro-V2 side and the anti-V2 side would be very clear then. He also said he thought SSPX would probably not make a deal because of the danger that it would actually have to obey the pope.

I tried to find the quote today, but I didn't have any luck. If I do, I will post it.

Anthony M · « **Reply #12 on:** May 11, 2012, 06:49:29 PM »

My main point is that the Sede's and other crack pots want you to falsely believe that just because the SSPX may receive approval from Rome that somehow it has sold out. That is madness. Did the Archbishop sell out the SSPX during the time it was approved by Rome ? NO. And the same applies today.

Those spreading false rumours and promiting division have a serious amount to answer for before God.

And yes, if you want to speak about respect for Fr. Cekada, granted, then the same applies for Bishop Fellay who is both a bishop and superior of the SSPX !

Telesphorus · « **Reply #13 on:** May 11, 2012, 06:53:57 PM »

Quote from: Anthony M

My main point is that the Sede's and other crack pots want you to falsely believe that just because the SSPX may receive approval from Rome that somehow it has sold out.

Approval from masonic Rome?

Quote

That is madness. Did the Archbishop sell out the SSPX during the time it was approved by Rome ? NO. And the same applies today.

Those were quite different times, things were still developing. He wasn't approved for very long.

Quote

Those spreading false rumours and promiting division have a serious amount to answer for before God.

Those who have eyes to see and ears to hear can see how the lines the SSPX is following have been gradually shifted. One can also see how much effort has been put into building up a false sense of security together with a reluctance to question the leadership.

PereJoseph · « **Reply #14 on:** May 11, 2012, 08:31:19 PM »

Quote from: Anthony M

My main point is that the Sede's and other crack pots want you to falsely believe that just because the SSPX may receive approval from Rome that somehow it has sold out.

Rome does not have the Faith; placing oneself under its rule therefore places the Catholic Faith at the same table as a non-Catholic religion. It is presumed, following from this, that reasonable men of good will can both maintain the Catholic Faith and the religion of Man simultaneously. This is an objective insult to the divine Faith of Our Lord Jesus Christ, as well as a blasphemy.

And just because you call somebody a 'crackpot,' or an 'extremist' or whatever other silly epithet you like, does not make it so.

Quote

That is madness.

Believing in the reconciliation of two irreconcilable principles, A and non-A, is truly madness.

Quote

And the same applies today.

Given the information he had at the time, it was truly a miracle of grace that protected him from the Vatican's tentacles. Besides, it is a completely different situation since then, given Assisi I, II, and III, the false beatifications and canonisations of heretics and enemies of the Faith, acts of apostasy, non-abjuration of heresies, and the statement of heresies by the men in the white cassock.

Quote

Those spreading false rumours and promiting division have a serious amount to answer for before God.

If you think the division within the Society and the letters are 'false rumors,' you're a little late to the game.

Where have you been ? As for division, that is all that can save the legacy of the Archbishop from the machinations of Benedict and Fellay now.

Quote

Bishop Fellay who is both a bishop and superior of the SSPX !

And he's running it into the ground and betraying the good fight to join up with a house of heresy, blasphemy, and the Revolution.