Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Analysis of 27th July Declaration by Fr. Pfeiffer  (Read 3936 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Analysis of 27th July Declaration by Fr. Pfeiffer
« Reply #15 on: July 12, 2013, 09:11:02 PM »
Thank you Neil Obstat for your input re Fr. Pfeiffer's analysis.
I find it hard to believe you would be banned from IA when the likes of Tradical, St. Justin, A Malleas, J.McFarland et al are given free reign.
I'm on the verge of giving up on IA because they exercise no 'banning' that I am aware of(????).  It is just a common free-for-all......a tit-for-tat blog with few valiant fighters for honest debate.

I wish you would (or could) display the last two posts you
have written in answer to T-Radical.  He, and his ilk vanish off he radar, or insult you when you refuse to dance to their tunes.  If they have no answer to logical conclusions they vanish off the radar, and renew their self-same arguments on another thread.



Analysis of 27th July Declaration by Fr. Pfeiffer
« Reply #16 on: July 12, 2013, 09:44:17 PM »
Quote from: Ecclesia Militans
To ask for the right to teach the Faith and condemn the errors of Vatican II against the same Faith WITHOUT AT THE SAME TIME demanding Rome to do the same, it implicitly but necessarily follows that Rome also has the right to teach those errors it currently holds. The SSPX leaders are hence co-operating in objective grave sin, at least on the level of principle, because it reduces the Faith to opinions.



Yes. You are right


Analysis of 27th July Declaration by Fr. Pfeiffer
« Reply #17 on: July 12, 2013, 09:52:37 PM »
Quote from: Viva Cristo Rey
Yes. They have uncrowned Him.    Vatican ll is centered on Man.  The true faith is centered on God.  

Vatican  2  gave obedience a priority and ditched vows of poverty and chastity.


We shouldn't shake hands with modernists who were lured by the Devil with silver.   Real Catholics don't make deals with the devil.  

Analysis of 27th July Declaration by Fr. Pfeiffer
« Reply #18 on: July 19, 2013, 09:25:09 AM »
Quote from: Ecclesia Militans
To ask for the right to teach the Faith and condemn the errors of Vatican II against the same Faith WITHOUT AT THE SAME TIME demanding Rome to do the same, it implicitly but necessarily follows that Rome also has the right to teach those errors it currently holds. The SSPX leaders are hence co-operating in objective grave sin, at least on the level of principle, because it reduces the Faith to opinions.



What HEBF* has done in this SARD is to proclaim the condemned errors
of the Sillon all over again.  

In Pascendi Dominici Gregis, Pope St. Pius X (curiously the very
namesake of the Society HEBF now deceives and misleads) condemned
the errors of the French Sillon by name.  The original docuмent was
to the French bishops written in French, since it was a French problem,
but later, he went universal on the principles with Pascendi.

And here, HEBF, who was trained in combat against Modernism, the
Grand Sewer of All Heresies, now turns around and takes a bath in
the same sewage.  

The Sillon was all about religious liberty, that you can believe what you
want, and I can believe what I want, and let's just all get along.  

Rodney King would have fit right in with the Sillon.  The Foothill Division
Police Department is still operational in Pacoima, CA, on Osborne St.

So this SARD asks for the right to teach the Faith and condemn the
errors of Vat.II, while others can adhere to the same errors and that's
okay with HEBF because he's eager to get along with heretics.  It's one
big, unhappy sewer-dwelling family pretending to be happy.