CathInfo.com

I wish I could give this post 10 up votes! Excellent!

Problem 1a - Novus Ordo Theology can't be Trusted
Let us question the novus ordo church's assignment of abortion as "one of mankind's greatest crimes" (5th paragraph of article).  Is abortion a great evil?  Yes, of course.  Is it an intrinsic evil against the natural law?  Yes.  It is one of the 4 sins which "cries to heaven for vengeance"?  Yes, it is.  But does that make it one of the greatest crimes?  Yes in one sense, but no in another sense.
.
Abortion, being a type of murder, is an intrinsic (i.e. essentially, always) evil against the natural law.  But supernatural evils (blasphemy, sacrilege, atheism, anti-catholicism) are always greater than natural evils, because the former attacks God directly, while the latter attacks our neighbor.
.
Thus, because V2 has ultimately destroyed the Faith, and it has so perverted and desensitized us to the HORRORS of blasphemy and sacrilege which happen in the new mass (which one could argue, is the greatest of religious sins), so I question these 4 novus ordo bishop's theological logic (again, with some exception for +Vigano).  Sins against Faith/religion are FAR, FAR GREATER than abortion, a fact that these 4 did not point out.
.

That's the one issue I have, the other being that the crime being participated in is not REMOTE and PAST, but rather PRESENT and ONGOING.  This is the major contribution from the NO bishops here, even though they did not properly articulate it.

In taking the vaccine, we are not merely participating in an isolated act of abortion that happened 60 years ago.  We're participating in the ongoing and present crime of using fetal cell tissue in vaccines.  We're participating in the entire abortion industry.  We are participating in something that's been wrongly and falsely legalized by our society and are therefore condoning this "legalization".

And the other implied point here is that, even to justify a "remote material" participation, there must be proportionately grave reason.  These bishops assert that abortion is so grave that the proportionately grave reason to justify even a remote material participation doesn't exist.