Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: A SATANIC SYNOD  (Read 731 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline chrstnoel1

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 655
  • Reputation: +519/-21
  • Gender: Male
A SATANIC SYNOD
« on: October 24, 2014, 07:25:23 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  •  Vatican III is already upon us, at the hands of the self styled "synodal pope". It was textbook revolution. A repeat of what we read in Ralf Wiltgen's "the Rhine flows in the Tiber", to the exception that the Plata river has joined the Rhine, and the rearguard is polish, African, and from some other isolated places. Conservative elements were allowed to show their token complaints, adding a more open and pluralistic debate to take place, but the truth that comes from below has to prevail. The Church is turning gαy, divorcish, and morally gradual: that is the reality that takes place and such reality in turn becomes official. Vatican II says the Church is the People of God, Francis just applies this principle. The train is leaving, now if conservatives like Fr Nely are not interested, they can step down, but they can stay and endeavour to persevere...

     The reality we are facing now in the conciliar church is even worse than we were expecting of this Synod so called "on the family" with the unimaginable pretence that the right of little children are going to be respected, while throwing them in ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ couples, with all the depravities that this alone entails, and with all the abominations taking place with surrogate mothers, (IVF, ie, plenty of abortions, eugenics, trafficking, abuse on third world women etc.).

     And how can you be in favour of the family while condoning so openly divorce, for the first time in the History of a Church who lost one of its most powerful nations, just on the question of the divorce of one man, Henry VIII?
    Gradualism means that if you sin, and plan to sin further, as long as you are in the process of hoping to do something about it, you are accepted, nay welcomed. You are just a prisoner of your own device, we’ll help you along as you are, and where you are, either on the gαy planet, or on the lefebvrian planet. We are all pilgrims of truth said Pope Benedict to the Lutherans.

     Typically, the president of the Polish Episcopal Conference stated that this was a departure from the teachings of His Holiness Saint John Paul two the Great. The most controversial paragraphs were turned down temporarily, and by a whisker (64% voted in favour of the text on ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs, some voted against because there was not enough for them). So Pope Francis maintained the infamous paragraphs and the whole text of the "Relatio post disceptationem" remains open for public debate until next year, sayeth mgr Forte, the special secretary, and it is the Pope who has the final say. Note well that these infamous paragraphs fell short of the two third majority but got always a comfortable absolute majority. It will pass easily in the second round, and Francis is clearly telling that those against are Pharisees who will have to obey the "God of surprises".

     The mentor of Pope Francis is more Saint Paul the sixth the Greater than John Paul two the great, a Pope that showed his ability to face down people of the past to impose the new aggiornamento. Just like in Vatican II, if the necessary votes are not gathered, the whole matter is thrown again in successive rounds of debate until it passes with faint conservative amendments.

     What matters is that the new ideas get floated for the first time in the full view of the world with the endorsement of the supreme authority of the Catholic Church. Opposition is allowed to swing in its turn, only to be defeated and chopped into the weaker recyclable half and the irreducible ones, who get taken care of later like the good old SSPX.

     Note the conservative types thrown at us like Cardinal Muller who stated that the Virginity of Our Lady is not a physical reality, or Cardinal Napier who says the text is incomplete because it should allow communion to polygamists as well. Conservatives of Vatican III match perfectly the ultra liberals of Vatican II. In any case, many voters did not approve the controversial paragraphs for reasons of procedure only, and not of content. The whole thing is totally teleguided from the start, including the conservative opposition to it. It is the Pope who appoints the moderators of the Synod and chooses its members at every consistory of Cardinals, removing the old, and promoting the surprises. The Pope orders the demagogic polls and stirs the pot by his scandalous declarations ahead of the Synod. Are the conservatives shocked at the beatification of Paul VI? Well, they should follow the example of the conservative Benedict XVI who duly attended the ceremony and endorsed it... isn't he slated as number three for take off after the canonization of Paul VI, John-Paul I? And there will be plenty more of unsavoury canonizations to swallow from now on.

     Did those conservatives really believe that Revolution would stop? If they did it was useful of them to believe so, to recycle gradually reactionary elements, but now the horses of Mephysto have to gallop further. All along they are made part of the revolutionary process that needs opposition to keep not just some spice in the debate but a focus on its principles and needs always an enemy to position its weapons better, like "target designation" in warfare.
    There is only one last stop for Revolution, and it is Hell. You can check in any time you want, but you can never leave.
    So come and check into my train, any time you want sayeth Pope Franshisssss!

    In Iesu et Maria,
    François Chazal+
    "It is impious to say, 'I respect every religion.' This is as much as to say: I respect the devil as much as God, vice as much as virtue, falsehood as much as truth, dishonesty as much as honesty, Hell as much as Heaven."
    Fr. Michael Muller, The Church and Her Enemies


    Offline Elizabeth

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4845
    • Reputation: +2194/-15
    • Gender: Female
    A SATANIC SYNOD
    « Reply #1 on: October 24, 2014, 08:00:25 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  •  :applause:


    Offline Maria Auxiliadora

    • Supporter
    • ***
    • Posts: 1424
    • Reputation: +1360/-142
    • Gender: Female
    A SATANIC SYNOD
    « Reply #2 on: October 25, 2014, 02:59:18 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Fr.Chazal
    The mentor of Pope Francis is more Saint Paul the sixth the Greater than John Paul two the great, a Pope that showed his ability to face down people of the past to impose the new aggiornamento. Just like in Vatican II, if the necessary votes are not gathered, the whole matter is thrown again in successive rounds of debate until it passes with faint conservative amendments.


    Dear Father Chazal,

    That would be the old treacherous way. The new one is through the infamous Paragraph 25 of Lumen Gentium and the “Doctrinal Preamble”:

    LG, 25
    : This religious submission of mind and will must be shown in a special way to the authentic magisterium of the Roman Pontiff, even when he is not speaking ex cathedra; that is, it must be shown in such a way that his supreme magisterium is acknowledged with reverence, the judgments made by him are sincerely adhered to, according to his manifest mind and will. His mind and will in the matter may be known either from the character of the docuмents, from his frequent repetition of the same doctrine, or from his manner of speaking.[/b]

    And don’t forget to give credit to “pope Emeritus” who gave us Francis and Cardinal Muller.
    The love of God be your motivation, the will of God your guiding principle, the glory of God your goal.
    (St. Clement Mary Hofbauer)