Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: A new Blog for the Resistance: Le Doctrinaire  (Read 2240 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Bernardus

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 44
  • Reputation: +118/-0
  • Gender: Male


Offline RomanCatholic1953

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10512
  • Reputation: +3267/-207
  • Gender: Male
  • I will not respond to any posts from Poche.
A new Blog for the Resistance: Le Doctrinaire
« Reply #1 on: April 13, 2013, 06:49:55 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • For those that do not have a translator.


    Saturday, April 13, 2013



       
    Letter to the Dominicans of Avrille






     Letter of the Dominicans of Avrillé, n ° 64, dec. 2012 - Jan. 2013-04-11 p.2 - 3



     That is why, while striving to teach the truth, we must condemn the errors that threaten Catholic intelligences of the beginning of the 21e  century, including those of the Conciliar Church. Because, as Ernest Hello said:



     Anyone who loves the truth hate the error. […] This detestation of the error is the touchstone to which feels the love of the truth. If you don't like the truth, you can to some extent tell you like it and even to believe: but be sure that in this case you miss horror for what is wrong, and that sign will recognize that you do not like the truth.



    ❖ Among current errors, you store those 'Conciliar Church '. These errors are contained in Vatican Council II himself, or do they come from a bad hermeneutics (interpretation)?



    The crisis in the Church comes from the Council itself. If we read the history of the Council, for example the Rhine flows into the Tiber by Ralf Wiltgen, one sees that a liberal and modernist Party took the direction of the Council with at least tacit approval of the Pope Jean XXIII and Paul VI. This is why the Council has produced infested texts of liberalism and modernism. However the error is often more or less hidden, as the modernists know very well to hide, as noted by St. Pius X: "page of their work could be signed by a Catholic: turn the page, you believe read a rationalist." (Encyclical Pascendi.)



    ❖ Give some examples of errors in the texts of the Council.  



    As noted by Archbishop Lefebvre, the Council took three great errors of the so-called French Revolution (freedom-equality-fraternity) with a form "ecclesiastical": religious freedom - collegiality - ecuмenism. Here are the docuмents of the Council that contain these three errors, and the previous magisterial docuмents that condemn them:



    Religious freedom affirmed by Dignitatis Humanæ was condemned by Pope Grégoire XVI (Mirari your), Pius IX (Quanta cura), Léon XIII (Immortale Dei), St. Pius X (Vehementer our) and Pius XI (Quas primas).



    Collegiality in Lumen gentium n ° 22 (same corrected by Nota praevia) is contrary to the teachings of Vatican I (Pastor aeternus) on the supreme power of the Pope.



    Ecuмenism and inter-religious dialogue advocated by Unitatis redintegratio and Nostra aetate, are condemned by Pius IX (Syllabus n ° 16 and 17), Léon XIII (Satis cognitum) and Pius XI (Mortalium animos).



    At the bottom of these errors is the Masonic doctrine of humanism: everything must be centered on humans (and not on God). This error is expressed in Gaudium et spes ("everything on Earth must be directed to man as its centre and its Summit") and in the final speech of Paul VI ("We also, we more than anyone, we have the cult of man"); It was condemned by Pius IX in the Syllabus. This is why the future Pope Benedict XVI said rightly that Gaudium et spes can be regarded as "a revision of the Syllabus of Pius IX, a kind of cross-Syllabus ».



    ❖ Yet Pope Benedict XVI offers a hermeneutic of continuity between the past of the Church and Vatican II. What do you think?



    The Pope himself describes this hermeneutic as 'renewal in the continuity of the unique church topic, that the Lord has given to us; "this is something that grows over time and which develops, while always remaining the Similarly, the single subject of the people of God turned.



    Therefore this hermeneutic allows to teach a doctrine contrary to that of the past, of him who teaches is in continuity (that is, it is the successor) who taught the previous doctrine. The current Pope could teach the opposite of the Syllabus!



    It conforms to the modernist thought that the Magisterium must transmit the religious experience of the Christian people, experience that changes with the times.



    But any other is the Catholic conception of the Magisterium, which must pass the same doctrine, that he had received of the Lord "in the same meaning and the same thought (in eodem sensu eademque sententia)" (Vatican I).



    ❖ But the Pope asks us to adhere to Vatican II. Do we obey?



    Of course not. Saint Paul himself responds in the Epistle to the Galatians (1.8): "If someone, drum - this ourselves or an Angel from heaven, announced it any other Gospel than that we have announced, let him be accursed!" And St. Peter said also: "He must obey God rather than men" (acts 5: 29)



    The new mass and the teaching of Vatican II jeopardise our faith by adopting a modernist mindset and by encouraging the Protestant heresies. It cannot accept them, because our faith is that we have more precious, it is she who saves us.



    The Church is made to give the faith. This is not the Catholic Church which impose us these reforms, it is 'Conciliar Church' i.e. a modernist party occupying the Church and that "destroys it". Our duty of Catholic is to resist these destructors and defend the Church our mother.



    ❖ Towards the Pope and the hierarchy, should we adopt an attitude of passive defence, we trying to keep the Tradition by simply issuing a few comments respectful and discreet, or should it be more offensive?



    When faith is in danger, it has a duty to speak to safeguard the common good of the Church. Archbishop Lefebvre knew practice the offensive: by his words (for example his statement of November 21, 1974, his press conference of December 1983, his sermons from 29 June to Ecône, etc) and especially by its acts, by continuing to order priests and crowning bishops despite the ban of the Conciliar Rome. It is true that for some time, this fighting spirit has much declined and this proves to be harmful: the faithful are less closed, and the Conciliar Rome is more enterprising to erode and dropping the Catholic resistance. Need to maintain the offensive, and that's what want to do our review the salt of the Earth and its various publications, including the Catechism of the crisis of the Church of the abbe Gaudron and the strange theology of Benedict XVI Bishop Mallerais Tissier (available from CFO, BP 1, 86190 Chiré-en-Montreuil).



    ❖ You seem well pessimistic. You do not have a word of hope?



    Our hope is in the Immaculate Heart of Mary. If the Pope finally performed the consecration of the Russia (and we know that it will make it, but as for the King of France, it will be later), then the Blessed Virgin will intervene to save the Church. In the meantime he must "stand firm in faith" (1 P 5.9), refusing any compromise with the enemy occupying the Church. The Catholic Church has the promise of eternal life, not the modernist sect which currently occupies it.





     Published by the Doctrinaire    to  05:40   No comment:    
    Send this post by emailBlogThis!Share on TwitterShare on Facebook


     
     

     


    Friday, April 12, 2013



       
    Carillon-Sacré-Coeur




    The flag you see at the top of the blog is the Carillon-Sacré-Coeur, which is the flag of the whole people of all United States French Canadians in the Canada. This flag is the perfect picture of what a people of Catholic and French descent. Royalist in the blood, proud of its traditions, the lily in the heart, the memory of these brave fighters which strafed this banner of blood of bravery. Today, let us pray the sacred heart, Ste-Anne, St Joseph and St-Jean Baptiste to us help.

    This article was inspired by c.. Magnan French "Le Carillon-Sacré-Coeur flag National Canadians.



    Under the title 'A national flag of the Sacred Heart' the great Catholic newspaper enjoyed in these glowing terms our new banner:

    "A large flag blue azure, hit in the four corners of a fleur de lis, and crossed with a large white cross that door, at the crossroads of the arms, a framed sacred heart of a double green sprig of Maple.

     

    It is the national flag adopted by our brothers in addition-ocean, French Canadians.



    Since long this race strong and fruitful, rooted in faith and overflowing with SAP, criminal recklessness of Louis XV abandoned, there is nearly a century and a half, dreamed to deploy its national flag. They form a people, in fact, these three million Canadians, from the 60,000 French in 1760; they are a people with his talk, its beliefs and its franchisees. They wanted so being a people have a flag.



    So, in January of this year 1903, a Committee was born in Quebec City, to establish the national colours.



    Flag azure, illustrated with lilies in the four corners, this is the standard famous and revered chime: chime, the almost legendary national victory, and that the people always looked at as miraculous; 15,000 French rout victory where, on July 10, 1758, on the shores of Lake Champlain, Montcalm with 3,600 Canadians, mit; the victory that summarizes today for French Canadians all the heroism and glory of the ancestors. Yes, the flag blue, reported Carillon by P. Berey, Chaplain of the troops, suspended as a trophy as a souvenir to the vault of the Récollets de Québec, saved providentially the fire that devoured this church in 1796, today preciously guarded by Université Laval, this blue flag, flowered Lily, had the right to reappear in broad daylight and floating on the French as a national flag Canada.



    It reappears load of the white cross which the France's once adorned its banners, and which marked the pennants of the mother country, burned by the chevalier de Lévis in 1760. He reappears with the maple leaf, the primitive settlers adopted as their emblem and that reminded French Canadians were the first occupants of this country. It reappears Finally, seal of the sacred heart.



    The national flag of French Canadians is therefore a flag of the sacred heart. This especially, we feel a great joy and we cordially welcome our brothers.



    Children of same breed, it pleases us, certainly, to see them unite in a national flag that cemented their block and multiplies their forces.



    But son of the same baptism, find it us more enjoyable still from see publicly affirm the faith that is common to us by printing, among the emblems and so colors chosen by their flag, save the sign of divine love. »



    The universe, Paris, 1903



    Adorning the national flag of a religious emblem, the sacred heart, the Quebec Committee responded to the desire of Léon XIII who, in his Encyclical Annum Sacrum, where it was the human race to the sacred heart of Jesus, asked that we honour him publicly.



    Promulgating this encyclical, on July 26, 1899, Grandeur Monseigneur Louis - Nazaire Bégin, Archbishop of Quebec, said in turn in his pastoral letter:



     "Blessed are the loyal heart who gladly accept this soft sovereignty of the Savior and prove to be docile to the least promptings of grace! Taking Jesus as King, obeying him, they will braid themselves an eternal Crown.



     «Happy nations who, far from fear and hinder the social reign of Christ, looking to the contrary this salutary guardianship and are the Church of God the place which deserves it in the Government of the human things!» "In recent times, especially, said Léon XIII, took to heart of dresser as a wall between the Church and civil society. In the constitution and administration of the States, it counts for nothing the authority of the sacred and divine law. It is designed to remove religious influence on the course of civil life.



     "That is why, a steady hand, the Holy Father is deploying over the Christian nations, above all mankind, the banner of the sacred heart, as a rallying sign, strength and salvation. '' It is, in a new form, the proclamation of the fundamental dogma of the supremacy and the universal kingship of one who is the master of peoples and Kings, individuals and corporations. »



     Is making to the desire expressed by the illustrious Léon XIII, and no less pressing of the Archbishop of the mother church of the Canada, the Quebec Committee performed a beautiful gesture of religious obedience, but it remained in agreement with the spirit and tradition of our national society, St-Jean-Baptiste. Indeed, the Saint-Jean-Baptiste society is not only national in its purpose, but also religious in his mind. The celebration of Saint-Jean-Baptiste always begins with a mass and its processions in his glorious boss is always accompanied by lamb - and not the "sheep", as say and write it the ungodly or unthinking - lamb, sacred emblem contained the Divine victim announced by John the Baptist.

     The first December 1907, the president of the Société Saint-Jean-Baptiste de Québec, the Honourable Adélard Turgeon, Minister in the Government of Quebec, addressed to S. G. Mgr l.. Bégin, about to leave for Rome, a resolution adopted by the national society, praying the Archbishop of Quebec to request of the Holy Father "the recognition and the solemn proclamation of John the Baptist as national patron of French Canadians." The letter from Mr. Turgeon to Bishop Bégin, the latter's reply of Rome and the papal brief proclaiming the precursor as national patron of French Canadians, attached to still its religious and national of the Société Saint-Jean-Baptiste. All docuмents relating to the brief of his Holiness Pius X declaring Baptist Patron Saint of French Canadians have published in The week religious of Quebec, from 1907-1908.

     

    "Against a background of azure adorned at each corner with a Fleur-de-lis, a white cross spreads. In the centre, surrounded by Maple leaves, shines the Jesus sacred heart. This design is simple but how much speaks to the soul of our race, how much he reminds him all that is dear to us! First is France, where we come from and which we piously retain the language, then the Canadian land, our homeland, discovered and civilized by our ancestors, and finally, the faith that illuminated our cradle and ceased to illuminate our market. »

    R.P. J.P.. Archambault, S.J.

     

     Carillon-Sacré-Coeur, so called by the popular voice, made a fortune and it flew the Canadian breezes in the days of the St-Jean-Baptiste and fur trees on education houses, town halls and even a day of the St-Jean-Baptiste, on the Québec Parliament. The first House of education which arbora Carillon-Sacré-Coeur was school normal Laval of Quebec, 1St  may, 1903.

    On June 24, 1903, the Carillon-Sacré-Coeur flotta triumphantly at the inauguration of the monument Bourget in Montreal: it was proudly worn by the Pontifical zouaves.

     

    «If ever you were asked whence this boldness of burn on your flags the image of the sacred heart, you will respond that it is the Lord himself that made you this point bold, in revealing himself, from the outset of our colony, to the venerable Mary of the Incarnation long prior to manifest itself at Paray.» Therefore, do we not have the right to be the first to put it on our flag?

    That it floats so proudly and the French Canadians, the flag colors of Carillon and weapons of the heart happily sanctity of our Lord. »

    R.P. Turgeon, S.J.

     

    "You don't say, but I assume that, in your mind, it is a national flag of French Canadians, in which would be the image of the sacred heart.

    Let me tell you first that I am not surprised to hear you rent the spontaneous movement of a good number of your students subscribing to the project; It is too noble, too high and especially too glorious to the sacred heart of Jesus to not cause your sympathies and win your eager support.

    This is to tell you how I found timely French Canadians to adopt a national flag, and how I found happy thought to include the image of the sacred heart.

    I hope that the idea will make its way; "but it would be very surprising it featureless not major obstacles: the prince of darkness - that not disarm because there is pride, - will not display without fidgeting, the glorious banner of his eternal winner.

    R.P. v. Ducharme, C.S.V.

     

     "You have understood that nothing would be cleaner to make your successful action to put you under the protection of the heart of Jesus. By placing it on your flag you have made it your model and your guide.

    Go draw this divine fire the faith, the courage, the generous zeal of the real soldiers of the Church and the fatherland; It will light in you this fire that he had placed in the heart of the Zouaves of Loigny, of Patay, and that made them win the admiration of the world.

    Walk in his light. You will follow the path of duty; You'll make your body a bulwark to the homeland and to the Church; you will shed your blood rather than forfeit to the faith and honour: witness, saint Maurice, you took for your boss and 6,600 martyrs of the Thebaine legion.

    Honour your flag; be it faithful to life, to death. »

    Bishop Frs.-X Cloutier



    "The flag that the Church will bless, I have no mission report is it is, yes or no, destined to become national flag. But well penetrate your souls of ideas and feelings is the symbol. I see together the three major components of your patriotism: the national faith, represented by this white cross that the Christian France, our former motherland, porta so long and so gloriously to his forehead; National hope, attached to this azure background, which was said to be on the banner of Carillon, and that, by the same, reminds us, with the heroic courage of our fathers, the goodness and the requests of Providence towards us; national, so much love expressed by these Maple leaves braided around the heart of Jesus, as for us to say that loving God we love his homeland, and loving his homeland, we know work, suffer, and devote themselves to it. »

     Bishop l.. Package

    In the 1960s was born what we call "the Quiet Revolution" with this expression we wanted to killed everything which was the Catholic religion. Everything, absolutely everything has passed, the people so wanted to be something else that it has simply changed its name. French Canadian he became Quebec. The Québécois, people without history, trivialised, born of the revolution, in ceaseless search for his true identity is undoubtedly a new people.



    A French Canadian is a Catholic first and foremost, the French language characterizes him in this anglophone entourage, physically strong, clever, humble and working he forged his race and his country, he is royalist at heart and soldier from birth he feels in his element in the scene of fighting as much policies than in a battlefield.



    Canadian martyrs have purified our race of their bloods. Quebecers have defiled this breed of blasphemy to the sacred heart which did not deserve our love and our submission.



    This blog is going to be the small lamp which will back the Sacred Heart in the hearts of French Canadians. The fight of resistance that refuses to submit to the evil spirit of Vatican II. We refuse to follow in his adventure Bishop Fellay, end point.



     Published by the Doctrinaire    to  10:24   No comment:    
    Send this post by emailBlogThis!Share on TwitterShare on Facebook


     
     Labels: Welcome  

     


       
    Release of the Abbé Jürgen Wegner





    www.SSPX.ca/FR/2013-03-28_Communique.PDF


     Published by the Doctrinaire    to  10:24   No comment:    
    Send this post by emailBlogThis!Share on TwitterShare on Facebook


     
     Labels: Abbot Patrick Girouard  

     


       
    Resistance in Canada



     Here is another site of the resistance in Canada, a blog in English. We wish them to stay firm in the faith!

    http://theresistanceincanada.ecclesiamilitans.com/mission_statement/background/


    Offline Neil Obstat

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 18177
    • Reputation: +8276/-692
    • Gender: Male
    A new Blog for the Resistance: Le Doctrinaire
    « Reply #2 on: April 14, 2013, 07:31:50 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

  • WOW.   That's a lot of translating.   (It's a lot of French, too.)  ........ flag:










    I'm very happy to see this.  I've never seen it before.  I've read about the
    Image of the Sacred Heart that St. Margaret Mary Alacoque said Our Lord
    requested be emblazoned on the French flag, but I've never seen one.  


    The Freemasons would be furious.......... good.............let them............
    .--. .-.-.- ... .-.-.- ..-. --- .-. - .... . -.- .. -. --. -.. --- -- --..-- - .... . .--. --- .-- . .-. .- -. -.. -....- -....- .--- ..- ... - -.- .. -.. -.. .. -. --. .-.-.

    Offline Neil Obstat

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 18177
    • Reputation: +8276/-692
    • Gender: Male
    A new Blog for the Resistance: Le Doctrinaire
    « Reply #3 on: April 14, 2013, 07:56:31 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

  • No, you don't have to say, "But that's not the French flag," roscoe.  Let's put the
    Sacré-Cœur on EVERYBODY'S flag!!  What would it look like on the blue-white-red
    of the French flag?  Probably pretty good.  How would it look on the Union Jack?  
    You know, I've always wondered what it was that was missing right there in the
    middle of the British flag.  What would it look like on the Stars and stripes?  I'd say,
    for starters, it ought to be right in the middle of the blue field of white stars.  In
    fact, if you want you can re-arrange the 50 stars to fit around Our Lord's Sacred
    Heart, because that would say, "We Are Making Room to Accommodate Our Lord."

    The fleur-de-lis in each corner of the flag above looks really special.  They have
    them leaning in like they're 3-dimensional or something.  Foreshortened?  It looks
    great.  

    There probably isn't a flag anywhere that can't have this added.  The Mexican
    flag would be a challenge because it already has that bird and the snake and
    stuff, right in the middle.  And the Poruguese flag already has 5 crosses on it.
    I've heard that represents the 5 wounds of the Crucifixion.  Sounds like all
    that's missing is the Sacred Heart in the center of it all!

    And the hammer-and-sickle of the Soviet flag - they need to get rid of that
    anyway.  This is a great excuse.  How about the Texas flag with one big
    star in the middle?  Well, make the star bigger and put the Sacred Heart right
    on top of it, so the star emerges with 5 points all around it.  How about the
    Canadian Maple Leaf?  Well, make the leaf bigger and it becomes a frame
    for the Sacred Heart.  We can do this.  

    This is great.  


    Wait........ isn't that branches of maple leaves on the flag above already?



    Okay, now I see.  It's Fr. Girouard!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!






        Abbé Patrick Girouard
        Bienvenue

    Aucun message portant le libellé Abbé Patrick Girouard.
    Afficher tous les messages
    vendredi 12 avril 2013



    http://ledoctrinaire.blogspot.ca/search/label/Abb%C3%A9%20Patrick%20Girouard







    .--. .-.-.- ... .-.-.- ..-. --- .-. - .... . -.- .. -. --. -.. --- -- --..-- - .... . .--. --- .-- . .-. .- -. -.. -....- -....- .--- ..- ... - -.- .. -.. -.. .. -. --. .-.-.

    Offline Neil Obstat

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 18177
    • Reputation: +8276/-692
    • Gender: Male
    A new Blog for the Resistance: Le Doctrinaire
    « Reply #4 on: April 14, 2013, 08:21:15 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0



  • I have almost no idea what this says (the Thursday saint March 28th 2013?):


     Déclaration aux membres de la Fraternité St-Pie X, aux communautés amies et aux fidèles de la Tradition.

    CE BLOG SUPPORTE TOUT PARTICULIÈREMENT M. L'ABBÉ PATRICK GIROUARD


    Déclaration aux membres de la Fraternité St-Pie X, aux communautés amies et aux fidèles de la Tradition.


    Le Jeudi Saint, 28 mars 2013

     
    Très chers frères et sœurs dans le Christ Roi,
     
    En ce jour où la Sainte Église commémore de grandiose façon l’institution du Saint Sacrifice de la Messe et du sacrement de l’Ordre, je profite de l’occasion pour vous faire part de ma décision de me placer en dehors de la structure officielle de la Fraternité. Mon intention n’est ni de la quitter, ni de la vilipender. Elle est en effet victime d’une entreprise qui vise à la ramener sous le pouvoir de l’Église Conciliaire, malgré les avertissements répétés de son fondateur, S.E. Mgr Marcel Lefebvre.

    Suite à mes sermons et interventions contre un ralliement, mon supérieur de district, M. l’abbé Jürgen Wegner, m’a transféré du Prieuré de Langley (près de Vancouver) au siège du district (St-Césaire, près de Montréal), avec l’intention avouée de me « surveiller étroitement ». Il m’a d’ailleurs déclaré que je ne pourrais plus critiquer les supérieurs. Dans sa lettre aux prêtres Canadiens au sujet de sa décision, il s’en est pris non seulement à mes déclarations publiques, mais aussi à mes conversations et courriels privés, échangés avec des fidèles. Il est donc clair qu’on m’offrait, en échange de mon silence en public et en privé, de me garder au sein de la Fraternité, et donc d’assurer ma sécurité matérielle. Ceci ne serait ni plus ni moins qu’une forme de prostitution spirituelle. Or je n’ai qu’une âme, et je veux la sauver. Je ne puis le faire en acceptant ce marché car, comme le dit le proverbe: « Qui ne dit mot, consent ». C’est donc, en gros, pourquoi je me vois dans l’obligation morale de refuser ce transfert. C’est pour moi la seule façon de continuer à travailler pour réaliser le vrai but de la Fraternité, qui n’est pas de convertir la Rome moderniste, mais bien de préserver et transmettre la vraie Messe et le vrai Sacerdoce. Je me suis donc placé entre les mains de la Providence, convaincu que Notre Seigneur saura bien prendre soin de son prêtre.

    Beaucoup a déjà été écrit sur le sujet d’un accord « purement pratique » avec Rome. Il me suffira de dire que j’endosse pleinement les déclarations et les études d’autres collègues qui se sont opposés à cette nouvelle orientation de la Fraternité. Je ne les répéterai donc pas ici. Je me permettrai cependant de vous faire part de quelques réflexions personnelles sur trois aspects de la crise de la Fraternité:

    Les autorités de la Fraternité veulent justifier l’abandon de la résolution du Chapitre Général de 2006 (« Pas d’accord pratique sans conversion de Rome ») en disant que la situation n’est pas la même aujourd’hui. On voudrait nous faire croire que beaucoup de nouveaux évêques, de prêtres, et de séminaristes, ne s’intéressent plus à Vatican II et préfèrent la Messe et la théologie traditionnelles. Or on est incapables de produire une étude sérieuse et indépendante qui en ferait la preuve. On ne nous en demande pas moins d’accepter ce que Mgr Lefebvre qualifiait d’ « Opération ѕυιcιdє ». Le Chapitre Général de 2012, loin de corriger le tir, n’a fait qu’envelopper de « conditions » cosmétiques ce changement de cap. La seule condition qui importait, la conversion de Rome, a en effet été abandonnée. De plus, ce Chapitre fut l’occasion d’un renversement du rapport de force entre les évêques: Du 7 avril 2012, où nous avions, d’un côté, trois évêques contre un accord « pratique » et, de l’autre, un Mgr Fellay isolé, on s’est retrouvé, le 14 juillet suivant, avec trois évêques en faveur d’un tel accord, contre un Mgr Williamson ostracisé, qui avait d’ailleurs été exclu du dit Chapitre. La déclaration finale au sujet de l’unité retrouvée signalait en fait la fin de la récréation pour tous les « réfractaires ». Désormais, à partir du 15 juillet 2012, toute opposition vis-à-vis d’un accord purement pratique, toute critique des autorités de la Fraternité sur ce sujet, devenait un crime contre la Fraternité elle-même. C’était instituer la loi du silence. On connaît la suite. Cette loi du silence est si forte que Menzingen ne se donne même pas la peine de répondre aux arguments et aux accusations; on se contente de diaboliser les opposants comme n’étant que de vulgaires rebelles aux menées subversives! Exit S.E. Mgr Williamson, et une bonne vingtaine de prêtres!

    Les docuмents secrets de S.E. Mgr Fellay (lettre du 14 avril 2012 aux trois autres évêques; Préambule du lendemain même), qui ont été publiés bien malgré lui, nous ont permis de comprendre jusqu’à quel point des rapports fréquents avec la Rome actuelle sont dangereux. Si de tels contacts ont pu changer, avant même la signature d’un accord, le Supérieur Général, ses Assistants, et, par ricochet, les autres Supérieurs Majeurs, qu’adviendrait-il des simples prêtres et des fidèles lorsqu’on serait officiellement, légalement, en permanence, sous la coupe des autorités romaines? On n’a qu’à voir jusqu’à quel point Menzingen persécute déjà ceux qui s’opposent à cette nouvelle orientation, alors que nous jouissons encore d’une certaine indépendance vis-à-vis de Rome, pour comprendre jusqu’où on ira une fois sous l’autorité de cette Église Conciliaire!

    Récemment, on a aussi voulu nous faire accepter la théorie selon laquelle l’expression « Église Conciliaire » ne signifierait pas une institution distincte de l’Église Catholique, mais plutôt une « tendance » au sein de celle-ci (Voir DICI, étude de m. l’abbé Gleize). La conséquence logique de cette théorie serait donc que le mouvement traditionaliste devrait retourner dans la structure officielle de l’Église, afin de combattre, de l’intérieur, la « tendance » conciliaire et ainsi faire triompher la Tradition. C’est pourquoi on entend souvent les autorités de la Fraternité dire qu’il faut « aider l’Église Catholique à se réapproprier sa Tradition ». Or, d’une part, l’Église Catholique, sans sa Tradition, ne pourrait exister; elle ne serait plus l’Église Catholique. Et, d’autre part, on ne peut plus parler de « tendance », dès lors que les idées libérales et maçonniques de Vatican II se trouvent « institutionalisées » par des réformes couvrant tous les aspects de la vie de l’Église: Liturgie, Catéchisme, Rituel, Bible, Tribunaux ecclésiastiques, Enseignement Supérieur, Magistère, et, surtout, le Droit Canon. Nous faisons donc face à une structure, à une institution, différente de l’Église Catholique. Si ce n’était le cas, nous en serions membres! Or ce n’est pas nous qui avons quitté l’Église Catholique, ce sont eux, même s’ils ont réussi à prendre les commandes de la structure officielle. En ce qui concerne la place du Pape dans tout cela, il faut bien convenir qu’il y a là un mystère, un mystère d’iniquité. Il n’en demeure pas moins que nous sommes en présence de deux institutions distinctes: L’Église Catholique, fondée par Notre-Seigneur, et l’Église Conciliaire, dont l’instigateur fut, à n’en pas douter, Lucifer.

     Ce ne sont là que trois petites réflexions, mais je crois qu’elles peuvent éclairer un peu certaines facettes du débat. Maintenant que je suis devenu totalement libre de parler, vous pouvez compter, chers frères et sœurs dans le Christ Roi, sur ma contribution régulière aux sites Internet du mouvement grandissant d’opposition au Ralliement, mouvement qui mérite bien le nom, je pense, de Résistance Catholique.
     
    Priez pour votre serviteur, comme je prie pour vous.

    Abbé Patrick Girouard, FSSPX
     
     
     
    Voici le lien de la conférence faite par l'abbé Girouard le 30 juin 2012, toujours d'actualité. Il serait bon de la réécouter pour se la remettre en mémoire.
     
    Conférence de l'abbé Patrick Girouard


    .--. .-.-.- ... .-.-.- ..-. --- .-. - .... . -.- .. -. --. -.. --- -- --..-- - .... . .--. --- .-- . .-. .- -. -.. -....- -....- .--- ..- ... - -.- .. -.. -.. .. -. --. .-.-.


    Offline MyrnaM

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6273
    • Reputation: +3628/-347
    • Gender: Female
      • Myforever.blog/blog
    A new Blog for the Resistance: Le Doctrinaire
    « Reply #5 on: April 14, 2013, 09:13:58 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • [/URL][/img]
    Please pray for my soul.
    R.I.P. 8/17/22

    My new blog @ https://myforever.blog/blog/

    Offline trento

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 775
    • Reputation: +206/-137
    • Gender: Male
    A new Blog for the Resistance: Le Doctrinaire
    « Reply #6 on: April 14, 2013, 09:35:11 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0



  • Offline MyrnaM

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6273
    • Reputation: +3628/-347
    • Gender: Female
      • Myforever.blog/blog
    A new Blog for the Resistance: Le Doctrinaire
    « Reply #7 on: April 15, 2013, 12:20:10 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Looks good Trento, maybe someday all flags will carry the Sacred Heart, and even the Immaculate Heart of Mary.  Can you imagine a world like that!
    Please pray for my soul.
    R.I.P. 8/17/22

    My new blog @ https://myforever.blog/blog/


    Offline Louis

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 25
    • Reputation: +66/-0
    • Gender: Male
    A new Blog for the Resistance: Le Doctrinaire
    « Reply #8 on: April 15, 2013, 02:24:03 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • To help our American and other friends to understand the flags of French, I'll try to explain :detective:

    This is the Royal French flag with the Sacred Heart like Our Lord asked Saint Marguerite-Marie in 1689

    Offline Exilenomore

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 720
    • Reputation: +584/-36
    • Gender: Male
    A new Blog for the Resistance: Le Doctrinaire
    « Reply #9 on: April 15, 2013, 02:36:46 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The trois-couleurs should be rejected, as it is a symbol of the revolution.

    Offline Louis

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 25
    • Reputation: +66/-0
    • Gender: Male
    A new Blog for the Resistance: Le Doctrinaire
    « Reply #10 on: April 15, 2013, 02:50:01 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • This flag on the blog is the flag of the French Canadian people. It was inspired by the banner of Carillon that Montcalm had when July 10th 1758, 3600 French Canadians beat 16 000 English soldiers at Fort Carillon.

    This national flag of the French Canadian was born in 1903 to counter the use of a masonic 3 colors flag since the "Patriots" revolts of 1837-38. Inspire by the Jesuits, they put the Sacred Heart on the Carillon banner to listen to Pope Leo XIII in his encyclical Annum Sacrum that consacred Human race to the Sacred Heart of Jesus and ask that it should be honor publicly.

    This Carillon Sacred Heart flag was the inspiration for the official flag of the Province of Quebec since January 21 1948 (by the way, January 21 is the day of the assassination of Louis XVI by the Revolution, not a coincidence :king:)