Author Topic: A Letter to Bp. Faure (Read 18054 times)

Matto · « **Reply #5 on:** August 26, 2015, 03:56:17 PM »

Quote from: covet truth

It is also very anti-Father Zendejas.

Yes, many of the posters are anti-Zendejas also. I believe it was tradfly (the owner) who said that Father Zendejas was not part of the resistance and also claimed that Zendejas was probably a modernist infiltrator. He didn't show any evidence, he just claimed it.

richard · « **Reply #6 on:** August 26, 2015, 04:04:28 PM »

Quote from: covet truth

Quote from: Matto
Quote from: hollingsworth
I would start this topic on the ABL2, since that forum published just today the letter reprinted below. However, I think I will end my participation there. ABL2 is too anti-Bp. Williamson for my blood.

Yes I have noticed that many of the posters on ABL2 are very anti-Williamson, including the owner. I didn't notice that as much on the original ABL forum.

The website is not only anti-Bishop Williamson and pro Fr. Pfeiffer, but also heavily influenced by sedevacantists. It is also very anti-Father Zendejas. It is not a good place to be.

The letter to Bishop Faure against Bishop Williamson was an embarrassment to read. If the Recusant published this garbage then he agrees with it and shame on him. At the very least we are finding out where their loyalties lie. I'm sure Bishop Faure has an appropriate file to put it in.

The Recusant crowd are very pro Fr.Pheiffer,in fact they told Bp.Williamson that his services were no longer required to say Mass.They prefer to wait for Fr.Pheiffer to say Mass.

hollingsworth · « **Reply #7 on:** August 26, 2015, 04:20:28 PM »

Quote

The Recusant crowd are very pro Fr.Pheiffer,in fact they told Bp.Williamson that his services were no longer required to say Mass.They prefer to wait for Fr.Pheiffer to say Mass.

Oh dear, really!!? No wonder the Church is such deep you-know-what. Yes, the clergy has over the decades become increasingly liberal and decadent. But numbers of the faithful are no bargain either. It' just mind boggling! :shocked:

covet truth · « **Reply #8 on:** August 26, 2015, 04:30:47 PM »

Quote from: hollingsworth

Quote
The Recusant crowd are very pro Fr.Pheiffer,in fact they told Bp.Williamson that his services were no longer required to say Mass.They prefer to wait for Fr.Pheiffer to say Mass.

Oh dear, really!!? No wonder the Church is such deep you-know-what. Yes, the clergy has over the decades become increasingly liberal and decadent. But numbers of the faithful are no bargain either. It' just mind boggling! :shocked:

It is true that "like attracts like". They deserve each other in my opinion. What a black-eye they are on what is left of the Archbishop's remnant.

hollingsworth · « **Reply #9 on:** August 26, 2015, 04:51:43 PM »

What I can't understand is how Fr. P might think for a single second that he can promote his neo-sspx seminary model, while at the same time trashing the bishop with regularity. Fr. P. needs at least one bishop to help forward his own agenda. I would suggest that this priest, who openly declares his no-confidence in His Excellency, and continually points to the latter's refusal to lead, or to lead properly, has created an insurmountable problem for himself and for his followers. Maybe he'd like to think that he's the tail wagging the dog. But folks, it doesn't work that way.
Fr. P can't pretend that the bishop(s) are, perhaps, not really cognizant of his dismissive attitudes. He can't fly down with Fr. Hewko to Brazil for the Consecration of a new, and act as if everything were hunky-dory. What does this priest think he's doing?
As for Frs. P and H being at that consecration, I understand from pretty good authority, that they were not formally invited to attend. They more or less crashed the party. If someone can correct my understanding on this issue, please feel free. I've been wrong before, but I don't think I'm wrong here.