CathInfo.com

letter :

Please, Your Excellency (Bp Faure), take charge. Show everyone how Archbishop Lefebvre would act. Renounce firmly the errors of Bishop Williamson. Your seminary is a great start, but at this point, the Resistance needs a Bishop who will lead, teach, and who will work for the King- ship of Christ - not one who passively waits for Our Lady to fix everything while he be- moans his sad situation.

And please put a muzzle on Bishop Williamson!

The Camidges were fine, apparently, with Bp. Williamson in October of 2012 when he was formally expelled from the Society.  They were fine with the bishop for a  couple of years thereafter.  But what happened to change their minds?  Did they begin to oppose the bishop after his infamous exchange with a woman during a Q & A on June 28 of this year?  Or were they convinced of his "errors" prior to that time?  Did they ever question his ability to teach and lead prior to June 28?  If so, what catalyzed their decision to expose him publicly in an open letter in August?  
Perhaps, the Camidges, one time firm supporters of the bishop, could not take it any longer.  Perhaps, they arrived at their decision to appeal to Bp. Faure out of desperation.  They saw virtually nothing they could do to rectify the situation.  So they exploded in frustration, even appealing to the very bishop whom the error-ridden and leadership-challenged senior bishop had just consecrated.   Maybe.

But you know what?  I think a certain priest, who tells us, even to this very today, that Bp. Fellay is really his "superior," had a lot to do with it.  (This priest will go unnamed, of course.  :furtive:)  I think this priest helped show the Camidges the error the bishop's ways.  I think this priest, still loyal to Bp. Fellay, is the one who reshaped their thinking, and put the Camidges on the path to correct thinking.  I really don't blame the Camidges at all, because I don't think they are the ones who really intended to put a wedge between the two bishops.  I surmise that they were heavily influenced by this priest, (who will go unnamed  :furtive:)  This unnamed priest  :furtive: is the one who would do anything to sow division between these two bishops.  

This is getting to be a very distressed and submerged tale.............. :scratchchin:

The truth will out, eventually.  

I have shared the current Recusant (which contains the LETTER to +Faure) with several friends and they're really disenchanted with the whole affair.  We are all supposed to be Catholic, and on TOP of that "traditional."  Where is the virtue in splintering the remnant in to broken shards of would-be pottery?

Why is there such a bent among Trads to sow infighting?  It is unbecoming of our claim to have the One True Faith.  How can we attract converts when we can't get along with each other?

Fr. Ortiz wrote an open letter to his faithful 2 years ago which is reprinted in this September issue, which essentially cautions them not to assist at SSPX Masses since they will gradually start acclimating to the new doctrinal outlook expressed in the AFD and the 6 Conditions, which have never been RETRACTED (not merely "withdrawn" - which is a lie).  

And THAT comes in the latter half of an issue that opens with a relentless (but well-written) some 20+ pages exposing the duplicity (my word) of +Williamson inasmuch as he says the N.O. liturgy is okay at least sometimes (when it's valid, obviously) for some people, and that everyone must make up their own mind, even though as an outgrowth of the heresies of Vat.II it is objectively dangerous to the faith of Catholics.

Don't get me wrong, I am not taking a stand one way or the other, but I'm watching this thing take shape just as October approaches, when several well-informed sources warn that we may well expect the CHASTISEMENT to begin.

Remember Our Lady of Fatima:  "...various nations will be annihilated," and Sr. Lucia answered the question "Does that mean including the U.S.A.?" in the affirmative.

A friend just showed me today a website where anyone can go and place an order for warplanes, missles, tanks, armored vehicles, ammunition, guns and bombs, provided they can pay for them.  And it's all private enterprise.  An experienced and informed and patriotic veteran of Vietnam (Marine sniper) assured us that it must be a front for the CIA trying to find out who is in the market to buy this stuff.  I told him this looks like an end-run around posse comitatus to me.  He didn't want to think about that!!!!!!!!!!!

.