Author Topic: A Letter to Bp. Faure (Read 18087 times)

JPaul · « **Reply #15 on:** August 26, 2015, 09:01:10 PM »

The fruits of the sects and in the end just more SSPXism.

JPaul · « **Reply #16 on:** August 26, 2015, 09:05:24 PM »

Quote from: hollingsworth

Quote
The Recusant crowd are very pro Fr.Pheiffer,in fact they told Bp.Williamson that his services were no longer required to say Mass.They prefer to wait for Fr.Pheiffer to say Mass.

Oh dear, really!!? No wonder the Church is such deep you-know-what. Yes, the clergy has over the decades become increasingly liberal and decadent. But numbers of the faithful are no bargain either. It' just mind boggling! :shocked:

:confused1: ....you said it..............

Maria Auxiliadora · « **Reply #17 on:** August 27, 2015, 05:02:57 AM »

Quote from: hollingsworth

What I can't understand is how Fr. P might think for a single second that he can promote his neo-sspx seminary model, while at the same time trashing the bishop with regularity. Fr. P. needs at least one bishop to help forward his own agenda. I would suggest that this priest, who openly declares his no-confidence in His Excellency, and continually points to the latter's refusal to lead, or to lead properly, has created an insurmountable problem for himself and for his followers. Maybe he'd like to think that he's the tail wagging the dog. But folks, it doesn't work that way.
Fr. P can't pretend that the bishop(s) are, perhaps, not really cognizant of his dismissive attitudes. He can't fly down with Fr. Hewko to Brazil for the Consecration of a new, and act as if everything were hunky-dory. What does this priest think he's doing?
As for Frs. P and H being at that consecration, I understand from pretty good authority, that they were not formally invited to attend. They more or less crashed the party. If someone can correct my understanding on this issue, please feel free. I've been wrong before, but I don't think I'm wrong here.

They cannot write such letter and expect + Faure to take it seriously. Fr Pfeiffer will not be needing a bishop, he will become one himself one way or the other (Thuc line).

TKGS · « **Reply #18 on:** August 27, 2015, 06:19:25 AM »

Quote from: Marie Auxiliadora

They cannot write such letter and expect + Faure to take it seriously. Fr Pfeiffer will not be needing a bishop, he will become one himself one way or the other (Thuc line).

Are there non-sedevacantist Thuc-line bishops? Fr. Pfeiffer is incredibly anti-sedevacantist based on the two or three sermons of his that I've watched. Why would he even consider talking with a Thuc-line bishop and, more importantly, why would a Thuc-line bishop even consider consecrating him?

JPaul · « **Reply #19 on:** August 27, 2015, 07:28:27 AM »

Marie Auxiliadora,

Quote

They cannot write such letter and expect + Faure to take it seriously. Fr Pfeiffer will not be needing a bishop, he will become one himself one way or the other (Thuc line).

It is a scandal that the Kentuckians allow, on their behalf, such a juvenile insulting letter to be published by their followers.
I have a feeling that one or the other Bishop will forgive and forget the petulance of their children and ordain their "seminarians" anyway.
But under priests of such a temperment, what kind of priests will they form?