Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: A Criticism of RECUSANT 10  (Read 10079 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

A Criticism of RECUSANT 10
« Reply #5 on: September 28, 2013, 02:51:06 PM »
Yes, I think Matthew is spot on. It would be totally illogical and foolish to point the finger at the SSPX and then go to the Indullt. While in principle such people are decrying that the SSPX is on the path of the Indult societies and then they themselves go there. I think that would be hypocrisy or double standards. This is  something that Our Lord constantly spoke out about in the gospels.

I think that some people are generating a personal hatred/dislike for the SSPX and or its priests to the extent of missing the point in the present situation.

A Criticism of RECUSANT 10
« Reply #6 on: September 28, 2013, 03:01:38 PM »
Quote from: Matthew
I don't understand why anyone would flee the SSPX and take refuge in the Indult.

I don't understand it either, but two people from my chapel who were important people, did just that and went to the indult.


A Criticism of RECUSANT 10
« Reply #7 on: September 28, 2013, 03:02:01 PM »
Quote
I think that some people are generating a personal hatred/dislike for the SSPX and or its priests to the extent of missing the point in the present situation.


Lest anyone think we go to an indult, let me disabuse them.  We saw the error of our ways.  However, though Matthew claims that the indult goes lower than the SSPX, I remind him and others again that the prior at ICC tells folks it is OK to go to the indult.  Perhaps, he can write Fr. Vassal and take this complaint up with him.  The point being that all priest in the Society are, apparently, not on the same page when it comes to indult attendance.

A Criticism of RECUSANT 10
« Reply #8 on: September 28, 2013, 03:19:20 PM »
I am not at all clear of what the position of the SSPX is in relation to the Indult. I started to wonder as I never recall SSPX priests in Ireland having a word with those promoting 'Catholic Voice' outside of chapels. I suppose newspapers advertising the Indult Mass and articles written by Institute of Christ the King priests are ok.

Fr Morgan, who stated Catholics shouldn't attend the Indult needs to be clearer. What is the position of the SSPX in relation to Motu Proprio Masses?

I have encountered plenty of SSPX laity in Ireland, who stated to go to the Indult if unable to attend the SSPX.

Those who attend the Indult are not one of us. They are not Traditionalist Catholics.

A Criticism of RECUSANT 10
« Reply #9 on: September 28, 2013, 03:30:12 PM »
It's a bit of mystery though how people can keep a foot in all camps. I was speaking to a man I know on a related topic. He is a pro-SSPX, Indult goer.  He would go to any Traditional Mass. He feels "Tradition" is too small in Ireland not to support each other.

I have encountered several others who expressed this opinion. Some of the pro-life SSPX youth would also go to the Indult.

There are few really in Ireland, who are SSPX 100%