Is it bad to hope that the current SSPX priest in my area gets transferred OUT? 

Be careful what you wish for.  Who you get may be worse.

This is completely false.  Supplied jurisdiction is clearly only ad hoc for the specific acts for which it is applied, e.g. confession, marriage, etc.  That's made clear in pretty much every commentary on Canon Law.  No, the SSPX priests stationed at chapels are NOT pastors of parishes.  There's no Catholic theologian who would agree that there can be habitual supplied jurisdiction.  Hey, why stop there?  Maybe the SSPX bishops have episcopal jurisdiction as well and can start setting up dioceses.

Hi Lad-

You are conflating a number of concepts here, and I wanted to try an straighten them out, in the hope of furthering our mutual understanding:

Firstly, the easy one: Nobody (much less +Tissier, the SSPX, or myself) is alleging  Society priests are pastors of parishes in the juridical sense. 

Rather, what is being argued is whether a canonically erected and approved pius union (who’s constitutions, which clearly suppose an hierarchical organization, and which were likewise approved the same day as the pius Union) can exert canonical authority and compel obedience from its members ad infra.

If the suppression of the Society was illegitimate and/or invalid, it would seem  plausible; if the Society was legitimately and validly suppressed, the argument is moot.

Secondly, nobody (least of all +Tissier, the Society, or myself) is arguing the SSPX possesses habitual or personal jurisdiction, but simply supplied jurisdiction. 

Your choice of words in calling the SSPX’s sustained use of Ecclesia supplet
“habitual supplied jurisdiction” muddies the water, but that aside, I’m not sure why you gratuitously claim (ie., you provide no argument to support) “no Catholic theologian would agree that there can be habitual supplied jurisdiction:”

Presuming by “habitual,” you mean “sustained and repeated,” the contrary is easily proven by referencing the account of St. Athanasius (who presumably continued to rely upon supplied jurisdiction during long stretches of his several excommunications, which would have deprived him of ordinary/personal/habitual jurisdiction).

There is no “cap,” or shelf life on supplied jurisdiction: It persists as long as necessity persists, and springs from the request of the faithful (which the latter may request “for any just cause”). 

True.  But, then, I have (many) other alternatives for Mass, so it's not an exceedingly critical thing for me.  I would like to find a good confessor / spiritual director, and those are difficult to come by.  I really haven't had that since I was last at STAS 30 years ago now.

I haven't had a good one for 25 years.

Firstly, the easy one: Nobody (much less +Tissier, the SSPX, or myself) is alleging  Society priests are pastors of parishes in the juridical sense. 

Just a question on this....
If the SSPX is not alleging they are pastors of parishes, why do they state they ARE pastors of parishes in their bulletins?
I believe it is deceptive.

I really did like Father Daniel Cooper, though, but I only went to Confession to him a couple times when I was on a business trip near Dickinson, so I don't really count that as ongoing spiritual direction.

I never even knew him, and I realize this is completely gratuitous on my part, but I believe he's a saint in heaven.  All I ever knew of him was that he battled with his cancer for years, but I never saw any of his online conferences until after he died.  Once I discovered those, they really put the hook in me.  We pray for his intercession privately every day after our family Rosary.

I never even knew him, and I realize this is completely gratuitous on my part, but I believe he's a saint in heaven.  All I ever knew of him was that he battled with his cancer for years, but I never saw any of his online conferences until after he died.  Once I discovered those, they really put the hook in me.  We pray for his intercession privately every day after our family Rosary.

I knew him, I first met him when I went on my first Retreat and my life has changed. He has done a lot of good for me and many other over the years.

Our bulletin here also does that, but I'd be surprised if the motive was to deliberately imply pastorship in the juridical/canonical sense.

I just always took it as meaning "the priest here is Fr. ______."

The SSPX knows the difference.

I really did like Father Daniel Cooper, though, but I only went to Confession to him a couple times when I was on a business trip near Dickinson, so I don't really count that as ongoing spiritual direction.

This fr. Daniel cooper?

-“We must obey Bp. Fellay because he has grace of state.”
-“Resistance is a step away from sedevacantism.”
-“The Society needs to make a deal with Modernist Rome so that it has the authority to provide the sacraments, etc.”
https://catholiccandle.neocities.org/priests/sspx-cooper-letter-refuted.html

"...when the abuse had been reported years earlier to the SSPX priest in charge of St. Thomas at the time, Fr. Daniel Cooper, he disregarded it and did not report it to police."
https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/transcript-spotlight-sspx

"i went to father Daniel Cooper. And he said. I will not testify against the brother priest, so he was father Daniel Cooper was unwilling to help you.."
https://fb.watch/dm4iR9WcKQ/