Recall +Fellay in Letter #63 about the Campos sellout:
"...it is primarily because of the pluralist and ecuмenical vision of things now prevailing in the Catholic world. According to this vision, everybody is to mix together without anybody needing any longer to convert...From such a standpoint there will even be a little room for Catholic Tradition, but for our part we cannot accept this vision of variable truth any more than a mathematics teacher can accept a variable multiplication table...The ambiguity implicit here has become more or less normal in the new situation in which they find themselves...The great danger here is that in the end one gets used to the situation as it is, and no longer tries to remedy it"
https://fsspx.asia/en/publications/letters/january-2003-superior-generals-letter-63-798
Yes, something happened to +Fellay somewhere along the road ... which many have traced to the arrival of Krah on the scene.
When someone speaks about the rights of Tradition WITHIN the Church (as if the Church were something broader than Tradition), not only has one gotten "used to it" and is no longer attempting to remedy it, but those statements actively LEGITIMIZE the V2 framework.
Everyone has gotten used to the Conciliar mindset and have given up on remedying it short of God's direct intervention, but legitimizing it is quite another thing, which is what Father Pagliarani was doing with that statement.