Of particular importance for this is the last section of the video that begins at 47:54.

 

Of particular importance for this is the last section of the video that begins at 47:54.

+Fellay is asked whether the Society will consecrate more bishops, and he responds that they will follow the same procedure as in 1988 (ie., Lefebvre went to Rome to ask them).

The problem there is that once Lefebvre realized Rome was negotiating in bad faith, his action was taken independent of Rome.

By ignoring that, +Fellay is effectively saying that the Society will seek permission from a Rome hostile to Tradition, such that, were bishops granted, they would certainly be of a stripe inimical to Tradition (whether they  come ad extra (Huonder) or ad infra (du Chalard, Celier, Simoulin, etc).

That type of inexplicable posture is what has me wondering if the SSPX hasn’t already received a “recognition of tolerance ad tempus” (ie., a probationary approval, contingent upon good behavior), which they fear to lose.

I grow weary of Bishop Fellay's fake politician smile.  I recall Bishop Williamson mocking that at one point.

+Fellay is asked whether the Society will consecrate more bishops, and he responds that they will follow the same procedure as in 1988 (ie., Lefebvre went to Rome to ask them).

The problem there is that once Lefebvre realized Rome was negotiating in bad faith, his action was taken independent of Rome.

By ignoring that, +Fellay is effectively saying that the Society will seek permission from a Rome hostile to Tradition, such that, were bishops granted, they would certainly be of a stripe inimical to Tradition (whether they  come ad extra (Huonder) or ad infra (du Chalard, Celier, Simoulin, etc).

That type of inexplicable posture is what has me wondering if the SSPX hasn’t already received a “recognition of tolerance ad tempus” (ie., a probationary approval, contingent upon good behavior), which they fear to lose.

I remember seeing an interview on which Bishop Fellay said that Pope Francis wants "tradition to flourish", or something to this effect.

The man is delusional.

It's the same smile NO "priests" usually have (Mike Schmitz for example). He pulls it off better than Fellay, though. Fellay's screams disingenuousness.

Mike Schmitz used to remind me of something or other, but I couldn't place it. Then I remembered: Max Headroom! (You'd have to be old enough to get it.)

And here 8 months later, they're still keeping us deceived.