1.
If I ask a question, it does not mean that I don't know how to do the research. It can mean that if you answer the question,
you will see how silly your argument is.
2.
The Council that declared Copernicanism a "formal heresy" was the opinion of Pope Urban VIII speaking as a "man" not as "pope"
(in an infallible way). That means that it's an opinion. The Church cannot make dogmas that pertan to science that has not been
revealed by God. And, the Bible does not give us a revelation from God on the subject of Geocentrism.
3.
The reason you cling to your ancient theory of Geocentrism is that you believe the Bible is divine revelation on Geocentrism. It is
not. If you look at the current state of the Church's teaching you will see that you are out of date.
Let us begin with Pope Leo XIII's encyclical you quote above. Note he says 'the opinions which each of the Fathers' had. Well this is Catholic teaching. It does not however make Pope Leo XIII deny the Council of Trent that decreed:
‘The Vulgate Editions of the Bible is Accepted and the Method Prescribed for the Interpretation of Sacred Scripture, etc.
‘The sacred and holy, ecuмenical, and general Synod of Trent, - lawfully assembled in the Holy Ghost, the Same three legates of the Apostolic See presiding therein, - keeping this always in view, that, errors being removed, the purity itself of the Gospel be preserved in the Church; which (Gospel), before promised through the prophets in the Holy Scriptures, our Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God, first promulgated with His own mouth, and then commanded to be preached by His Apostles to every creature, as the fountain of all, both saving truth, and moral discipline; and seeing clearly that this truth and discipline are contained in the written books, and the unwritten traditions which, received by the Apostles from the mouth of Christ himself, or from the Apostles themselves, the Holy Ghost dictating, have come down even unto us, transmitted as it were from hand to hand; (the Synod) following the examples of the orthodox Fathers, receives and venerates with an equal affection of piety, and reverence, all the books both of the Old and of the New Testament - seeing that one God is the author of both - as also the said traditions, as well those appertaining to faith as to morals, as having been dictated, either by Christ's own word of mouth, or by the Holy Ghost, and preserved in the Catholic Church by a continuous succession. But if any one receive not, as sacred and canonical, the said books entire with all their parts, as they have been used to be read in the Catholic Church, and as they are contained in the old Latin vulgate edition; and knowingly and deliberately condemn the traditions aforesaid; let him be anathema…. Furthermore, in order to curb imprudent clever persons, the synod decrees that no one who relies on his own judgement in matters of faith and morals, which pertain to the building up of Christian doctrine, and that no one who distorts the Sacred Scripture according to his own opinions, shall dare to interpret the said Sacred Scripture contrary to that sense which is held by holy Mother Church, whose duty it is to judge regarding the true sense and interpretation of the Holy Scriptures, or even contrary to the unanimous consent of the Fathers, even though interpretations of this kind were never intended to be brought to light. Let those who shall oppose this be reported by their ordinaries and be punished with the penalties prescribed by law.’ -- (Denz – 783/786)
Pope Leo XIII did not deny Trent, he wrote 'EACH OF THE FATHERS' not 'ALL OF THE FATHERS.'
Now given churchmen before him had allowed heliocentric books to be printed in the wake of them all falling for the 'proofs' that the earth moves, and the encyclical was meant to curb the 'scientific' attacks on ther Bible's revelations, all begun by Galileo and continued by Churchmen, and the fact that pope Paul V had issued a papal decree defining a fixed sun formal heresy, which churchmen took to be an error (that turned out not to be an error), a Church harming 'mistake' that had to be covered over. So what did they do, they used this encyclical, just as you do apollo, as referring to the 1616 decree that condemned heliocentrism as formal heresy BECAUSE IT CONTRADICTED THE UNANIMOUS CONCENT OF THE FATHERS, and used it forevermore as some sort of infallible rejection of the 1616 decree.
Here are two such examples of hoax.
‘Actually, almost 100 years before Pope John Paul II’s apology, an earlier Pope (Leo XIII) effectively reinstated Galileo in an encyclical dealing with how Catholics should study the Bible. Although Pope Leo XIII does not mention Galileo by name in the encyclical, nevertheless, “In 1893, Pope Leo XIII made honorable amends to Galileo’s memory by basing his encyclical Providentissimus Deus on the principles of exegesis that Galileo had expounded.”’ ---D. A. Crombie’s ‘A History of Science from Augustine to Galileo,’ Vol. 2, 1996, p.225
‘Anyone who will compare this [Galileo’s] wonderful letter with the Encyclical Providentissimus Deus of Pope Leo XIII on the study of Holy Scripture will see how near in many places Galileo came to the very words of the Holy Father.’--- James Brodrick, S.J: The life of Cardinal Bellarmine, Burns Oats, 1928, p.351.‘Galileo addressed this problem in his famous Letter to Castelli. In its approach to biblical exegesis, the letter ironically anticipates Pope Leo XIII’s encyclical Providentissimus Deus (1893), which pointed out that Scripture often makes use of figurative language and is not meant to teach science. Galileo accepted the inerrancy of Scripture; but he was also mindful of Cardinal Baronius’s quip that the Bible “is intended to teach us how to go to heaven, not how the heavens go.” And he pointed out correctly that both St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas taught that the sacred writers in no way meant to teach a system of astronomy.’--[1] Catholics United for the Faith - Catholics United for the Faith is an international lay apostolate founded to help the faithful learn what the Catholic Church teaches, 2010.