Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: 'Open Letter' author criticizes the SSPX for attacking the said Letter  (Read 2806 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: 'Open Letter' author criticizes the SSPX for attacking the said Letter
« Reply #5 on: October 24, 2019, 05:06:04 PM »
You know the SSPX is in bad shape when conservative conciliarists are calling them liberals!

Offline Pax Vobis

  • Supporter
Re: 'Open Letter' author criticizes the SSPX for attacking the said Letter
« Reply #6 on: October 24, 2019, 07:13:45 PM »

Quote
The author of the OnePeterFive article says that Fr. Gleize is not calling out Francis on his heresies. That seems to be his main complaint. 
Meg, the article (part 2 of 2) is responding to the new-sspx’s critique of the ORIGINAL letter (part 1 of 2), which was calling for the bishops/cardinals to corner +Francis on his heretical acts.  They are anything but sedevacantist.  They are acting completely OPPOSITE of sedevacantism because they want the Church to declare +Francis is wrong; they aren’t attempting to do this privately. 
.
Secondly, why are you defending the new-sspx?  I thought you were a resistance-supporter?


Re: 'Open Letter' author criticizes the SSPX for attacking the said Letter
« Reply #7 on: October 24, 2019, 07:19:32 PM »
I am absolutely awed by Dr. Lamont’s acuмen regarding an heretical pope, and the seeming ease with which he dispatches Fr. Gleize.

There are many things pertinent to the issue of deposition contained in this lengthy article which I have not seen elsewhere.

Very well-done!

:applause: :applause:

Offline Mark 79

  • Supporter
Re: 'Open Letter' author criticizes the SSPX for attacking the said Letter
« Reply #8 on: October 24, 2019, 10:51:30 PM »
Emailed this:


Quote
Dear Dr. Lamont,

I recently learned of your entry into the fray of Bergoglian heresies and I compliment you for your contribution, especially regarding The Open Letter. Please keep that approbation in mind as I offer this in consideration of the sentence, "The correctio filialis described some of the other intellectual sources of Pope Francis’s heresies, including modernism and the ideas of Martin Luther."

In view of the au courant taboo precluding criticism of the Jews, it is understandable that the correctio filialis failed to describe the most influential of Bergoglio's "other intellectual sources," тαℓмυdism.

Let us not fail to identify the pervasive тαℓмυdic heresies of the man subsisting in the Chair of Peter. In particular, he has succuмbed to the тαℓмυdic formula Yeridah Tzorech Aliyah (“descent for sake of ascent”), wallowing in sin as a path to [тαℓмυdic] "holiness." This formula is evident in "God is purifying the church with sin." He has painted the Holy Trinity as a pack of contentious rabbis: "Inside the Holy Trinity they’re all arguing behind closed doors but on the outside they give the picture of unity." His well-docuмented enthusiasm for all things тαℓмυdic finds him adopting insults akin to the medieval Toledot Yeschu: "…the memory of him [Jesus] who has made himself sin, who has made himself the devil, the serpent, for us…." The infamously blasphemous medieval Toldot Yeschu was republished by his friend, Chief Rabbi of Rome Ricardo Di Segni, under the misleading title "Il vangelo del ghetto" ("The Gospel of the Ghetto"), subtitled "storie di Gesù" (the history of Jesus) and described as "leggende e docuмenti della tradizione medievale ebraica" (legends and docuмents of the medieval Jєωιѕн tradition). Only one week after his putative election, his newspaper, L’Osservatore Romano, recommended daily тαℓмυd study [scroll to page 6 here].

Please consider these research leads because this is far from a comprehensive list of his тαℓмυdic transgressions. It is no accident that for decades this monstrous heretic has studied and consistently expressed his affinity for the doctrines of God's most organized earthly opposition.

In the Sacred and Immaculate Hearts,
Editor, http://judaism.is/


Re: 'Open Letter' author criticizes the SSPX for attacking the said Letter
« Reply #9 on: October 25, 2019, 03:20:19 AM »
Indeed, a good article from Dr. Lamont for One Peter Five. I write for 1P5 and it's nice to see how seriously Catholic the folk there are. But there's no question of him "attacking the SSPX", rather serious Catholics are thinking together of how best to deal with these heresies. Fr. Gleize's point is more that, for the last 50 years, there have been errors coming from the Council; this was also what Fr. Pagliarani said recently, "we cannot allow the point of reference to go back than Saint John Paul II" or something close to that. Dr. Lamont is saying Pope Francis has shown himself, in some ways, more hostile to Traditional Teaching than his predecessors. Dr. Lamont and the other signatories of the Open Letter urge the Catholic Bishops to take remedial measures for correcting the Pope. The ideal way for all of this would be settled would be, for e.g. the Pope correcting himself, or a Successor correcting him, as Pope John XXII's error on the Beatific Vision was corrected by his Successor.