Catholic Info
Traditional Catholic Faith => SSPX Resistance News => Topic started by: Student of Qi on April 06, 2018, 11:06:35 PM
-
In the past two weeks I've been given a personal, firsthand account that the infamous Fr. Tetherow is now a bishop, with Orders given by a Bishop Adamson. I probably won't see or hear from this fellow again for a good part of this year. So I would like to ask if anyone knows more about this? Who is Bishop Adamson and where does he come from? I am going to presume they are Sedevacantists. Is "Bishop Tetherow" still in league with Fr. Pfeiffer and Company?
-
Here it is if you can wrap your head around it: http://www.tboyle.net/Catholicism/Thuc_Consecrations.html.
Just do a ctrl+f and type "Adamson" and you'll get to the right place.
As a side note, "Bishop" Lopez-Gaston "ordained" Rama Coomaraswamy in the presence of "Bishop" Malachi Martin: http://www.the-pope.com/validity.html.
-
This would explain why Fr. Pfeiffer is staying on (Bishop) Fr. Tetherow's good side. We all wondered why Fr. Pfeiffer would send his parishioners to someone with such a shady past. Well, now we know! There is Fr. Pfeiffer's solution for who is going to ordain his seminarians, who is going to consecrate himself a bishop, etc.
I can see the threads now:
"My only choices for Mass are the SSPX and a Pfeifferite (Tetherow-line) chapel. Where should I go?"
Those threads will be quite common I bet. We already have the SSPX option everywhere. But imagine if 5 or 6 poorly trained seminarians get ordained by Bp. Tetherow -- and fly all over the country like Fr. Pfeiffer did/does. Most people would have either SSPX or SSPX/Pfeiffer for a Mass option.
-
In the past two weeks I've been given a personal, firsthand account that the infamous Fr. Tetherow is now a bishop, with Orders given by a Bishop Adamson. I probably won't see or hear from this fellow again for a good part of this year. So I would like to ask if anyone knows more about this? Who is Bishop Adamson and where does he come from? I am going to presume they are Sedevacantists. Is "Bishop Tetherow" still in league with Fr. Pfeiffer and Company?
I heard about this a while ago. He has two seminarians studying under him. Sickening. Birds of a feather flock together... perverts and laicised tetherow, cordaro, roberts, friends with Pfeiffer and hewko? As fr. Hewko used to say, "gross!!"
-
This would explain why Fr. Pfeiffer is staying on (Bishop) Fr. Tetherow's good side. We all wondered why Fr. Pfeiffer would send his parishioners to someone with such a shady past. Well, now we know! There is Fr. Pfeiffer's solution for who is going to ordain his seminarians, who is going to consecrate himself a bishop, etc.
I can see the threads now:
"My only choices for Mass are the SSPX and a Pfeifferite (Tetherow-line) chapel. Where should I go?"
Those threads will be quite common I bet. We already have the SSPX option everywhere. But imagine if 5 or 6 poorly trained seminarians get ordained by Bp. Tetherow -- and fly all over the country like Fr. Pfeiffer did/does. Most people would have either SSPX or SSPX/Pfeiffer for a Mass option.
Mr. Tetherow was legitimately laicised. He cannot be legitimately consecrated.
The only people who would accept a tetherow consecration of fr. Pfeiffer would be the "special people" (as he calls them) who treat him as a demigod.
So, I think you are wrong, Matthew.
Fr. Pfeiffer has only 3 non-first-year seminarians. Who knows how much longer they will last. Mr. Dougherty lasted 5 years before fr. Pfeiffer demoted him to brother (That's what fr. Pfeiffer thinks of brothers. Not that it's a legitimate religious calling, but that it is a demotion). Those young men still have much studying to do before a legitimately ordination, and they have no time to study with all the travelling they do.
Fr. Pfeiffer is out there, his motto being the end justifies the means, but he knows he has to answer to God for his actions as does fr. Hewko.
I could be wrong, but I don't see it happening.
-
b. Macek did the "consecration" of Mr. Tetherows chapel and continues to do the confirmations for his congregation members.
No word of tetherow becoming a bishop on his website yet:
https://smarcc.org/photo-gallery/
Just looking at him with young men near him makes me want to vomit:
http://www.bishop-accountability.org/news2011/07_08/2011_07_30_Nann_hαɾɾιsburgDiocese.htm
-
In the past two weeks I've been given a personal, firsthand account that the infamous Fr. Tetherow is now a bishop, with Orders given by a Bishop Adamson. I probably won't see or hear from this fellow again for a good part of this year. So I would like to ask if anyone knows more about this? Who is Bishop Adamson and where does he come from? I am going to presume they are Sedevacantists. Is "Bishop Tetherow" still in league with Fr. Pfeiffer and Company?
Fr. Pfeiffer claimed a long time ago that he cut ties with tetherow. Then again, he said the same thing about moran, which I know to be untrue... so, who knows....
-
In the past two weeks I've been given a personal, firsthand account that the infamous Fr. Tetherow is now a bishop, with Orders given by a Bishop Adamson. I probably won't see or hear from this fellow again for a good part of this year. So I would like to ask if anyone knows more about this? Who is Bishop Adamson and where does he come from? I am going to presume they are Sedevacantists. Is "Bishop Tetherow" still in league with Fr. Pfeiffer and Company?
B. Merrill Adamson just said that he didn't consecrate tetherow.
So, either your informer is incorrect or he is speaking of another Adamson.
-
Is it true, someone created a Thuc-line, kiddie porn Bishop?
If you told me Tetherow was coached and funded by the SSPX, I'd believe it.
Why? Because the SSPX fears Thuc line priests and Bishops who can interfere with their designs to monopolize traditional Catholicism.
Any PR damage they can do to the true remnants of traditional Catholicism, they will do.
Legal counsel Max Krah and Fr. Wegner's hiring of a Jєωιѕн PR firm to re-brand the Society is all we need to know about the SSPX's integrity.
-
What is wrong with people? This Tetherow character is a known pervert. Why would anyone associate themselves with him? Even the NO does not want him.
-
What is wrong with people? This Tetherow character is a known pervert. Why would anyone associate themselves with him? Even the NO does not want him.
Tetherow was ordained NO in 2002.
He was laisiced by the same NO in 2015.
Either he was never a priest (if you don't recognize any NO ordination as legitimate), or he is no longer a priest (if you recognize a NO ordination then you must recognize the laicization by NO).
Either way, he isn't supposed to be acting as a priest.
Fr. Pfeiffer claims Mr. Tetherow was framed.
I fail to see how that is true since Mr. Tetherow CONFESSED to child pornography.
In my opinion, anyone who is willing to work with or submit the faithful to a pervert, as b. Macek is with mr. tetherow, and fr. Pfeiffer and fr. Hewko are with fr. Roberts and Mr. Cordaro, should be avoided.
It is clear to me SSJ part 2 is forming.
-
I think it's time to say: the cult in Boston, KY is not funny anymore. They used to be good for a laugh, but now we're talking about defending, rehabilitating and associating with perverts!
It's pretty safe to say: Anyone with a functioning brain must have left by now.
-
Without evidence, I would not believe this report. Tetherow's M.O is to directly or indirectly pass on disinformation to discredit someone as "liar" or "unreliable". I saw it many times. Other than that, I have said all I had to say. https://www.cathinfo.com/sspx-resistance-news/fr-pfeiffer-mentions-a-fr-tetherow-who/
-
Anyone who would entrust their spiritual direction or the spiritual welfare of their children to this Tetherow character will have no excuse for any of the consequences that may follow.
-
I think it's time to say: the cult in Boston, KY is not funny anymore. They used to be good for a laugh, but now we're talking about defending, rehabilitating and associating with perverts!
It's pretty safe to say: Anyone with a functioning brain must have left by now.
Which is why fr. Pfeiffer, himself, refers derogatorily to people still with him as "special people"...
What perverts are they rehabilitating?
They are further allowing laicised priests to say mass and hear confessions for the Faithful. Clearly uncanonical.
You are right. It is not funny anymore.
Its SSJ part 2, without canonical authority or a bishop to shut them down.
At what point can one say, without a doubt, fr. pfeiffer and fr. Hewko are heretics?
-
Is it true, someone created a Thuc-line, kiddie porn Bishop?
If you told me Tetherow was coached and funded by the SSPX, I'd believe it.
Why? Because the SSPX fears Thuc line priests and Bishops who can interfere with their designs to monopolize traditional Catholicism.
Any PR damage they can do to the true remnants of traditional Catholicism, they will do.
Legal counsel Max Krah and Fr. Wegner's hiring of a Jєωιѕн PR firm to re-brand the Society is all we need to know about the SSPX's integrity.
And the opposition must be kept divided in view of the forthcoming General Chapter /SG Election in July 2018?
-
At what point can one say, without a doubt, fr. pfeiffer and fr. Hewko are heretics?
Formal heretics? Never. None of us can convene and head up an ecclesiastical tribunal to excommunicate anyone. We'd have to have authority over the priest(s) in question.
Now material heretic is another story. Any obvious deviation from Catholic doctrine makes one a material heretic. But in this category would go all those who don't know their Faith well enough to make no mistakes in theology. In other words, a person can accidentally stumble upon material heresy. For example, I've heard a pious lady call God "the greatest angel of them all" -- but saying God is an angel, a separated substance, a created being, is pure heresy. But she obviously didn't mean it like that. She meant the greatest SPIRIT or something like that.
But to prove obstinacy in a given heresy, any cleric has a right to an ecclesiastical trial, as Martin Luther was given. Only after this can a person be excommunicated by the Church.
Only the Dimond Brothers and other schismatics attempt to be a "lay pope" and excommunicate people left and right, declaring them vitandus (to-be-avoided) at the same time.
-
This would explain why Fr. Pfeiffer is staying on (Bishop) Fr. Tetherow's good side. We all wondered why Fr. Pfeiffer would send his parishioners to someone with such a shady past. Well, now we know! There is Fr. Pfeiffer's solution for who is going to ordain his seminarians, who is going to consecrate himself a bishop, etc.
I can see the threads now:
"My only choices for Mass are the SSPX and a Pfeifferite (Tetherow-line) chapel. Where should I go?"
Those threads will be quite common I bet. We already have the SSPX option everywhere. But imagine if 5 or 6 poorly trained seminarians get ordained by Bp. Tetherow -- and fly all over the country like Fr. Pfeiffer did/does. Most people would have either SSPX or SSPX/Pfeiffer for a Mass option.
:facepalm:
Glad I am out of this mess. Conservative Byzantine. Waiting for WWIII and Fire, Blood, and Tears to clean this up so I can go back to the Western Church.
Everything is fracturing and falling apart just like the 70's. JPII stabilized it with his soft apostasy but here we are back to the same old, same old. Wash, rinse, repeat. Expect to be home alone sometime during the next 10 years.
R&R, SSPX, FSP are all rotting from within. Resistance is to little to late.
-
And the opposition must be kept divided in view of the forthcoming General Chapter /SG Election in July 2018?
Fellay was an infiltrator put in by the liberal Swiss who are imbued with the principles of the 1789 Revolution. SSPX is hosed. Never trust any Catholic from Europe; they are marinated in the spirit of 1789.
Poor, poor Archbishop. All his work for nothing. Sometimes I think God didn't want it that way.