Read an Interview with Matthew, the owner of CathInfo

Author Topic: "Bishop Tetherow"  (Read 1907 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Student of Qi

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 495
  • Reputation: +268/-44
  • Gender: Male
"Bishop Tetherow"
« on: April 06, 2018, 11:06:35 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • In the past two weeks I've been given a personal, firsthand account that the infamous Fr. Tetherow is now a bishop, with Orders given by a Bishop Adamson. I probably won't see or hear from this fellow again for a good part of this year. So I would like to ask if anyone knows more about this? Who is Bishop Adamson and where does he come from? I am going to presume they are Sedevacantists. Is "Bishop Tetherow" still in league with Fr. Pfeiffer and Company?
    Many people say "For the Honor and Glory of God!" but, what they should say is "For the Love, Glory and Honor of God". - Fr. Paul of Moll

    Offline monka966

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 122
    • Reputation: +43/-18
    • Gender: Female
    Re: "Bishop Tetherow"
    « Reply #1 on: April 07, 2018, 09:18:02 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Here it is if you can wrap your head around it: http://www.tboyle.net/Catholicism/Thuc_Consecrations.html

    Just do a ctrl+f and type "Adamson" and you'll get to the right place.


    As a side note, "Bishop" Lopez-Gaston "ordained" Rama Coomaraswamy in the presence of "Bishop" Malachi Martin: http://www.the-pope.com/validity.html.



    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 21786
    • Reputation: +19157/-111
    • Gender: Male
    Re: "Bishop Tetherow"
    « Reply #2 on: April 07, 2018, 09:43:00 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • This would explain why Fr. Pfeiffer is staying on (Bishop) Fr. Tetherow's good side. We all wondered why Fr. Pfeiffer would send his parishioners to someone with such a shady past. Well, now we know! There is Fr. Pfeiffer's solution for who is going to ordain his seminarians, who is going to consecrate himself a bishop, etc.

    I can see the threads now:
    "My only choices for Mass are the SSPX and a Pfeifferite (Tetherow-line) chapel. Where should I go?" 

    Those threads will be quite common I bet. We already have the SSPX option everywhere. But imagine if 5 or 6 poorly trained seminarians get ordained by Bp. Tetherow -- and fly all over the country like Fr. Pfeiffer did/does. Most people would have either SSPX or SSPX/Pfeiffer for a Mass option.
    Start your Amazon.com session by clicking this link, and my family and I get a commission on your purchase!

    Offline Fanny

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 571
    • Reputation: +240/-359
    • Gender: Female
    Re: "Bishop Tetherow"
    « Reply #3 on: April 07, 2018, 10:05:49 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!1
  • In the past two weeks I've been given a personal, firsthand account that the infamous Fr. Tetherow is now a bishop, with Orders given by a Bishop Adamson. I probably won't see or hear from this fellow again for a good part of this year. So I would like to ask if anyone knows more about this? Who is Bishop Adamson and where does he come from? I am going to presume they are Sedevacantists. Is "Bishop Tetherow" still in league with Fr. Pfeiffer and Company?
    I heard about this a while ago.  He has two seminarians studying under him.  Sickening.  Birds of a feather flock together... perverts and laicised tetherow, cordaro, roberts, friends with Pfeiffer and hewko?  As fr. Hewko used to say, "gross!!"

    Offline Fanny

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 571
    • Reputation: +240/-359
    • Gender: Female
    Re: "Bishop Tetherow"
    « Reply #4 on: April 07, 2018, 10:28:32 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • This would explain why Fr. Pfeiffer is staying on (Bishop) Fr. Tetherow's good side. We all wondered why Fr. Pfeiffer would send his parishioners to someone with such a shady past. Well, now we know! There is Fr. Pfeiffer's solution for who is going to ordain his seminarians, who is going to consecrate himself a bishop, etc.

    I can see the threads now:
    "My only choices for Mass are the SSPX and a Pfeifferite (Tetherow-line) chapel. Where should I go?"

    Those threads will be quite common I bet. We already have the SSPX option everywhere. But imagine if 5 or 6 poorly trained seminarians get ordained by Bp. Tetherow -- and fly all over the country like Fr. Pfeiffer did/does. Most people would have either SSPX or SSPX/Pfeiffer for a Mass option.
    Mr. Tetherow was legitimately laicised.  He cannot be legitimately consecrated.
     
     The only people who would accept a tetherow consecration of fr. Pfeiffer would be the "special people" (as he calls them) who treat him as a demigod. 
     
     So, I think you are wrong, Matthew.
     Fr. Pfeiffer has only 3 non-first-year seminarians.  Who knows how much longer they will last.  Mr. Dougherty lasted 5 years before fr. Pfeiffer demoted him to brother (That's what fr. Pfeiffer thinks of brothers.  Not that it's a legitimate religious calling, but that it is a demotion).  Those young men still have much studying to do before a legitimately ordination, and they have no time to study with all the travelling they do.
     
     Fr. Pfeiffer is out there, his motto being the end justifies the means, but he knows he has to answer to God for his actions as does fr. Hewko.
     
     I could be wrong, but I don't see it happening. 


    Offline Fanny

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 571
    • Reputation: +240/-359
    • Gender: Female
    Re: "Bishop Tetherow"
    « Reply #5 on: April 07, 2018, 11:32:38 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  •  b. Macek did the "consecration" of Mr. Tetherows chapel and continues to do the confirmations for his congregation members.

    No word of tetherow becoming a bishop on his website yet:
    https://smarcc.org/photo-gallery/

    Just looking at him with young men near him makes me want to vomit: 
    http://www.bishop-accountability.org/news2011/07_08/2011_07_30_Nann_HarrisburgDiocese.htm

    Offline Fanny

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 571
    • Reputation: +240/-359
    • Gender: Female
    Re: "Bishop Tetherow"
    « Reply #6 on: April 07, 2018, 11:35:09 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • In the past two weeks I've been given a personal, firsthand account that the infamous Fr. Tetherow is now a bishop, with Orders given by a Bishop Adamson. I probably won't see or hear from this fellow again for a good part of this year. So I would like to ask if anyone knows more about this? Who is Bishop Adamson and where does he come from? I am going to presume they are Sedevacantists. Is "Bishop Tetherow" still in league with Fr. Pfeiffer and Company?
    Fr. Pfeiffer claimed a long time ago that he cut ties with tetherow.  Then again, he said the same thing about moran, which I know to be untrue...  so, who knows....

    Offline Fanny

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 571
    • Reputation: +240/-359
    • Gender: Female
    Re: "Bishop Tetherow"
    « Reply #7 on: April 07, 2018, 01:15:25 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • In the past two weeks I've been given a personal, firsthand account that the infamous Fr. Tetherow is now a bishop, with Orders given by a Bishop Adamson. I probably won't see or hear from this fellow again for a good part of this year. So I would like to ask if anyone knows more about this? Who is Bishop Adamson and where does he come from? I am going to presume they are Sedevacantists. Is "Bishop Tetherow" still in league with Fr. Pfeiffer and Company?
    B. Merrill Adamson just said that he didn't consecrate tetherow.

    So, either your informer is incorrect or he is speaking of another Adamson.  


    Offline Incredulous

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3989
    • Reputation: +4949/-246
    • Gender: Male
    Re: "Bishop Tetherow"
    « Reply #8 on: April 07, 2018, 02:29:25 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0

  • Is it true, someone created a Thuc-line, kiddie porn Bishop?

    If you told me Tetherow was coached and funded by the SSPX, I'd believe it.

    Why?  Because the SSPX fears Thuc line priests and Bishops who can interfere with their designs to monopolize traditional Catholicism.

    Any PR damage they can do to the true remnants of traditional Catholicism, they will do.

    Legal counsel Max Krah and Fr. Wegner's hiring of a jewish PR firm to re-brand the Society is all we need to know about the SSPX's integrity.




    "Some preachers will keep silence about the truth, and others will trample it underfoot and deny it. Sanctity of life will be held in derision even by those who outwardly profess it, for in those days Our Lord Jesus Christ will send them not a true Pastor but a destroyer."  St. Francis of Assisi

    Offline monka966

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 122
    • Reputation: +43/-18
    • Gender: Female
    Re: "Bishop Tetherow"
    « Reply #9 on: April 07, 2018, 02:32:39 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • What is wrong with people? This Tetherow character is a known pervert. Why would anyone associate themselves with him? Even the NO does not want him.

    Offline Fanny

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 571
    • Reputation: +240/-359
    • Gender: Female
    Re: "Bishop Tetherow"
    « Reply #10 on: April 07, 2018, 02:57:03 PM »
  • Thanks!3
  • No Thanks!0
  • What is wrong with people? This Tetherow character is a known pervert. Why would anyone associate themselves with him? Even the NO does not want him.
    Tetherow was ordained NO in 2002.
    He was laisiced by the same NO in 2015.

    Either he was never a priest (if you don't recognize any NO ordination as legitimate), or he is no longer a priest (if you recognize a NO ordination then you must recognize the laicization by NO).

    Either way, he isn't supposed to be acting as a priest.

    Fr. Pfeiffer claims Mr. Tetherow was framed.
    I fail to see how that is true since Mr. Tetherow CONFESSED to child pornography.

    In my opinion, anyone who is willing to work with or submit the faithful to a pervert, as b. Macek is with mr. tetherow, and fr. Pfeiffer and fr. Hewko are with fr. Roberts and Mr. Cordaro, should be avoided.  

    It is clear to me SSJ part 2 is forming.


    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 21786
    • Reputation: +19157/-111
    • Gender: Male
    Re: "Bishop Tetherow"
    « Reply #11 on: April 07, 2018, 03:42:04 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • I think it's time to say: the cult in Boston, KY is not funny anymore. They used to be good for a laugh, but now we're talking about defending, rehabilitating and associating with perverts!

    It's pretty safe to say: Anyone with a functioning brain must have left by now.
    Start your Amazon.com session by clicking this link, and my family and I get a commission on your purchase!

    Offline Maria Auxiliadora

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1248
    • Reputation: +1263/-64
    • Gender: Female
    Re: "Bishop Tetherow"
    « Reply #12 on: April 07, 2018, 04:10:34 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0

  • Without evidence, I would not believe this report. Tetherow's M.O is to directly or indirectly pass on disinformation to discredit someone as "liar" or "unreliable". I saw it many times. Other than that, I have said all I had to say.  https://www.cathinfo.com/sspx-resistance-news/fr-pfeiffer-mentions-a-fr-tetherow-who/
    The love of God be your motivation, the will of God your guiding principle, the glory of God your goal.
    (St. Clement Mary Hofbauer)

    Offline monka966

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 122
    • Reputation: +43/-18
    • Gender: Female
    Re: "Bishop Tetherow"
    « Reply #13 on: April 07, 2018, 04:24:57 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  •  Anyone who would entrust their spiritual direction or the spiritual welfare of their children to this Tetherow character will have no excuse for any of the consequences that may follow.

    Offline Fanny

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 571
    • Reputation: +240/-359
    • Gender: Female
    Re: "Bishop Tetherow"
    « Reply #14 on: April 07, 2018, 10:35:12 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • I think it's time to say: the cult in Boston, KY is not funny anymore. They used to be good for a laugh, but now we're talking about defending, rehabilitating and associating with perverts!

    It's pretty safe to say: Anyone with a functioning brain must have left by now.
    Which is why fr. Pfeiffer, himself, refers derogatorily to people still with him as "special people"...
    What perverts are they rehabilitating?
    They are further allowing laicised priests to say mass and hear confessions for the Faithful.  Clearly uncanonical.
    You are right.  It is not funny anymore.
    Its SSJ part 2, without canonical authority or a bishop to shut them down.
    At what point can one say, without a doubt, fr. pfeiffer and fr. Hewko are heretics?

     

    Sitemap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16