Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Resistance - at a chapel with a good priest?  (Read 12749 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Neil Obstat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18177
  • Reputation: +8276/-692
  • Gender: Male
Resistance - at a chapel with a good priest?
« Reply #45 on: January 25, 2013, 06:17:32 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

  • Quote from: John Grace
    http://revisionistreview.blogspot.ie/2010/04/some-questions-for-hierarchy-of-society.html
    Quote
    Tuesday, April 20, 2010
    Some Questions for the Hierarchy of the Society of St Pius X (SSPX)

    Is the Derogation of Calvary and the Ascendance of Auschwitz "your fight"?


    I have no idea where this quote came from.  It's not found on the link provided.  
    Who is "Anonymous?"  

    Quote
    Quote
    Anonymous said...
    In regard to the notice on the Irish District website it should be noted that the District Superior (a Spaniard who had relatives who fought for the Anarchist butchers against Catholicism during the cινιℓ ωαr; they subsequently died in German labour camps during WWII) ordered that his notice be read out from the pulpit of every SSPX church in Ireland when he produced the statement one year or so ago.

    After its first reading-out, at a particular church, the news spread across Ireland so quickly that queues of protesting faithful lined up to literally besiege the priests in other parts of the country with complaints and remonstrations.

    Consequently the notice was not read out at several of the churches in Ireland.

    All the priests are foreign but the Irish are no fools.

    The British District of SSPX and its faithful are not fools either. The attempted pacifying of the тαℓмυdists and the outrageous and disgraceful way that Bishop Williamson has been treated by a few of his confreres is utterly rejected throughout the District.

    Neither are the great bulk of French or Italians taken in by this scandalous attempt to kowtow to the тαℓмυdic power.

    If it were possible for you to supply French and Italian translations of your work you would surely find an enormous and very appreciative audience, Mr. Hoffman.





    h0Ɩ0cαųstianity
    --- now is that a word that will ever catch on?  If we start
    using it, maybe it will!  Wouldn't the Zionists hate that?  They might make it a
    crime to say this word in public, you know.  Would a law like that wake people
    up, or would it just convince them of the Zionism dogma?

    The link above provides a page with a Hoffman article that ends thusly:




    ...Most Catholics would pour scorn on the idea that a bishop must be suppressed to placate Arabs because he cast doubt on the Israeli h0Ɩ0cαųst in Palestine. But "The h0Ɩ0cαųst," as the suffering of Judaic persons during World War II has come to be known as a result of the imposition of a type of Newspeak, has in fact entered the Catholic Church and assumed a position as a de facto sacred dogma.

    We must no longer run from the fact that the religion-of-Judaism-for-gentiles which this writer terms "h0Ɩ0cαųstianity" derogates the Passion of Our Lord in favor of the notion that the supreme suffering of all history was experienced at Auschwitz by Judaics. This is the stated position of Cardinal Sean P. O'Malley and of many other bishops and cardinals of the modern Catholic Church.


    The SSPX, said to be a priestly fraternity that wishes to defend the Church as it existed prior to Vatican Council II, would appear to be complicit in cooperating with the modernist infiltration of the rabbinic Shoah theology into the Church, and priests and laity of the SSPX are told that this modernist infiltration is not their fight. Indeed, by their silence and inaction they are party to this subversion.

    I have a question for the hierarchy of the SSPX: If the derogation of Calvary in favor of Auschwitz as the supreme martyrdom in world history is not your fight, what is?

    I have witnessed the SSPX hierarchy expending a significant amount of time and energy kowtowing to h0Ɩ0cαųstianity. I have seen them do nothing noteworthy, however, about the rapidly increasing use of the name of Jesus Christ in Hollywood movies as a swear word.


    I have not the seen the SSPX expend any energy whatsoever on James Cameron's campaign to convince the world that Jesus Christ did not resurrect from the dead.  Mr. Cameron, one of the wealthiest and most powerful directors in Hollywood, produced a docuмentary movie for the Discovery television channel entitled, "The Lost Tomb of Jesus." This sophisticated  movie, broadcast to millions, endeavors to show that the decomposing bones of Jesus were once held inside a tomb located by Cameron's team of Resurrection-deniers.


    Last I knew the Apostle Paul had nothing to say about gas chamber denial, but he did solemnly warn about the consequences of Resurrection-denial: "If Christ has not been raised, then our preaching is in vain and your faith is in vain." (I Cor. 15:14). There is no Church and no Faith if Christ did not rise from the dead. It would seem that Hollywood Resurrection-deniers such as James Cameron are striking at the very heart of what it means to be Catholic, yet resistance to this diabolism has been neutralized. How has this neutralization come to pass?


    Against James Cameron's campaign of Resurrection-denial, the SSPX have had nothing to say. Cameron's most recent New Age science fiction movie "Avatar" is the highest grossing movie of all time. No Catholic boycott was launched against it.


    What the SSPX forgets, whether willfully or not, is that h0Ɩ0cαųstianity is akin to the "smoke of Satan" which afflicted another and earlier pontificate of unhappy memory. By embracing the Vatican's acceptance of the revolutionary, modernist Shoah theology which has as its goal the ascent of Auschwitz to the ontological position of the greatest and most egregious suffering in all of human history -- ahead of Christ -- the SSPX is breathing an infectious smoke which in many other respects perverts its judgment and skews its priorities. It has certainly perverted the judgment of Pope Benedict, who has entered three ѕуηαgσgυєs in less than five years, wherein he encouraged the assembled Pharisees to continue in their traditions. This papal abomination in the ѕуηαgσgυєs is a symptom of a profound spiritual malaise, undoubtedly emanating from the grave disorder that inclusion of Shoah theology in the Church has sown.


    About this horror, the SSPX is oblivious. In fact, in so far as the evidence indicates, the SSPX has become a party to it. I draw the reader's attention to an article published in the December, 2009 issue of The Angelus, the official organ of the SSPX in the United States, entitled "Saint of the Sanhedrin" containing grotesque praise for the wicked Pharisee Hillel, elementary errors in the history of the тαℓмυd, and a flattering fantasy about the Pharisee Gamaliel. The editor of The Angelus has refused to retract this misleading and deceptive article which would have been suitable for publication in the bulletin of the B'nai B'rith or the journal of the Scottish Rite of Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ. Meanwhile in Ireland the SSPX has issued a statement affirming the "h0Ɩ0cαųst" that reads like a press release from the Simon Wiesenthal Center.


    No reasonable person expects the SSPX to join the ranks of World War II revisionists and debate the forensic chemistry of Zyklon B in Auschwitz-Birkenau. Rather, we are calling on them to resist the modernist heresy of h0Ɩ0cαųstianity, which the Vatican, with unprecedented lawlessness, has made a litmus test for holding ecclesiastical office.


    To the SSPX we say, since Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre founded your order, resistance to modernism has been "your fight." Since there is no more pernicious manifestation of modernism in our time than h0Ɩ0cαųstianity, why then have you fled the field of combat under cover of anemic alibis and whining subservience to the new Vatican theology which has substituted Auschwitz for Calvary?








    ................. and what does this have to do with Resistance Chapel and good priests?  

    .--. .-.-.- ... .-.-.- ..-. --- .-. - .... . -.- .. -. --. -.. --- -- --..-- - .... . .--. --- .-- . .-. .- -. -.. -....- -....- .--- ..- ... - -.- .. -.. -.. .. -. --. .-.-.


    Offline Frances

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2660
    • Reputation: +2241/-22
    • Gender: Female
    Resistance - at a chapel with a good priest?
    « Reply #46 on: February 06, 2013, 12:40:36 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • FYI- Fr. Pfeiffer has personally told me there is "NO SIN IN STAYING AWAY FROM A MASS THAT HAS FOR YOU, BECOME A NEAR OCCASION OF SIN."  This is in reference to the continual harassment and stress at an SSPX Chapel that has resulted in physical illness.  Our Lord obliges nobody to hear Mass under these conditions.  "Stay home.  Rest.  Read the missal.  Pray your Rosary.  Wait until a Mass becomes available."  
     St. Francis Xavier threw a Crucifix into the sea, at once calming the waves.  Upon reaching the shore, the Crucifix was returned to him by a crab with a curious cross pattern on its shell.