Author Topic: Resistance - at a chapel with a good priest? (Read 12750 times)

John Grace · « **Reply #30 on:** January 13, 2013, 11:09:57 AM »

Quote from: Incredulous

This SSPX-Resistance is a organic, grass-roots Catholic movement, like the Cristeros.

We have to support it anyway we can. There is no turning back.

Going to neoSSPX chapels for the Sacraments is a temporary fix, since Msgr. Fellay has stated he will forgoe a doctrinal agreement in lieu of a practical ageement with newRome.

How could we trust a man who hires a zionist and accepts Gutman/Rothchild inheritance funds, while sacking many holy priests and Bp. Williamson?

We have have to put our hearts into the SSPX-Resistance and fight!

Whilst Matthew and Faber make sense in their comments, I do agree there is no turning back. This resistance network is the way forward. Rome wishes to change the thinking of Traditionalists.

With what you have written in mind, I must admit, I was annoyed when I informed people of the expulsion of Bishop Williamson only for them to inform me, they had been to Mass via the Institute Christ the King the week before.

There has been a tendency in Ireland that because Tradition is so small that people must support each other. For many once they are getting the Latin Mass it matters little if it is from a Society priest or the local Diocesan priest.

I see this new resistance as something good but ultimately it is providential. A more purified resistance is emerging.

John Grace · « **Reply #31 on:** January 13, 2013, 11:16:14 AM »

Quote

The SSPX suppresses the works of Fr. Fahey?

Many who attend the SSPX have never read the works of Fr Fahey yet at same time a new generation of people, who never attend a Traditional Mass are reading the works of this "pure saint".

Again a personal opinion and some might say it is deluded but this resistance will flourish. God is directing Bishop Williamson,Fr Pfeiffer and the resistance in this noble crusade.

CathMomof7 · « **Reply #32 on:** January 13, 2013, 01:41:23 PM »

I attended Mass at the SSPX chapel where Fr. Hewko was one of our priests.

If you want to know what's going on at that chapel today, ask him. See what he tells you.

Our family left when the priest in charge began directing everyone to stay off the internet and he started stalking me here at CathInfo.

Other families left after he assaulted a parishioner.

I attend Mass now at an independent chapel. It's a heck of a lot less crazy than what is happening in the Society.

In my opinion, we all have to be prepared to leave the Society just like people had to be prepared to leave NO.

The Society is NOT the Church.

My husband and I are 100% certain we made the right decision.

ServusSpiritusSancti · « **Reply #33 on:** January 13, 2013, 02:04:41 PM »

Quote from: Telesphorus

I think it depends on the individual priest. That being said, going to such a chapel can present a temptation towards compromise.

I agree with Tele.

If you have a very liberal and domineering priest who gives ridiculous sermons and kicks out anyone who objects to a deal with Rome, it's best to leave that chapel. But if your local SSPX parish has a good priest who doesn't act like that, you should attend Mass there if it's your only option.

songbird · « **Reply #34 on:** January 13, 2013, 02:32:19 PM »

Chapter 12 of Daniel is on us. We had priest that were not priest when I was a teen. We had the trad. Mass and such, but the priest kept their secret that they were not priest, infiltrators and that meant no sacraments were taking place, although everything else seemed to be ok. I attend trad. Mass for the sacraments. I pray they are still there. (CMRI) After this group, I don't see anything else. It is very sad, but God wants us to know what life on this earth is like without the Precious Blood. And it will take place, it is just a matter of when.

CathMomof7 · « **Reply #35 on:** January 15, 2013, 07:39:57 AM »

Let's see Pablo. Were you there? Do you know what happened? Or are you a troll for this priest?

This priest indeed assaulted a parishioner. There were witnesses. I was a witness to a part of the incident. I assure you, it was very unpriestly.

The priest lives in fear???? There are plenty of men, women, and children who live in fear that this priest will become irate and either confront or attack them.

Two years of agony for a priest?? What about the agony that parishioners are experiencing because they are watching their chapel, a chapel they worked hard to purchase, and prayed hard to fill, go down in flames? What about the agony of not being "allowed" to go back into your chapel? What about being removed from your volunteer positions? What about that agony?

And yes, they wouldn't call the police on a priest. Although, in my opinion, they should have.

Perhaps YOU should know what your are talking about before you make comments.

The Priests are NOT God! They are still men. And as such, we do not have to bow down to them. They HAVE to be held accountable for their actions. PERIOD.

Just how do you think this pedo-priest mess in the NO was allowed to fester for so long? Because everyone was afraid to call the police. Bull hockey!

ancien regime · « **Reply #36 on:** January 15, 2013, 11:04:26 AM »

Quote from: John Grace

Quote
The SSPX suppresses the works of Fr. Fahey?

Many who attend the SSPX have never read the works of Fr Fahey yet at same time a new generation of people, who never attend a Traditional Mass are reading the works of this "pure saint".

Again a personal opinion and some might say it is deluded but this resistance will flourish. God is directing Bishop Williamson,Fr Pfeiffer and the resistance in this noble crusade.

Please tell me:

Why have they suppressed the works of Fr. Fahey?

Quo Vadis Petre · « **Reply #37 on:** January 15, 2013, 11:22:34 AM »

Quote from: ancien regime

Quote from: John Grace
Quote
The SSPX suppresses the works of Fr. Fahey?

Many who attend the SSPX have never read the works of Fr Fahey yet at same time a new generation of people, who never attend a Traditional Mass are reading the works of this "pure saint".

Again a personal opinion and some might say it is deluded but this resistance will flourish. God is directing Bishop Williamson,Fr Pfeiffer and the resistance in this noble crusade.

Please tell me:

Why have they suppressed the works of Fr. Fahey?

For the same reason they removed most SSPX.org articles concerning the Jєωs and for making clarifications of +Fellay's reference to them as "enemies of the Church": fear of them

1st Mansion Tenant · « **Reply #38 on:** January 15, 2013, 11:03:04 PM »

Is that priest still there at your chapel, or was he removed?

John Grace · « **Reply #39 on:** January 16, 2013, 10:55:09 AM »

Quote from: ancien regime

Quote from: John Grace
Quote
The SSPX suppresses the works of Fr. Fahey?

Many who attend the SSPX have never read the works of Fr Fahey yet at same time a new generation of people, who never attend a Traditional Mass are reading the works of this "pure saint".

Again a personal opinion and some might say it is deluded but this resistance will flourish. God is directing Bishop Williamson,Fr Pfeiffer and the resistance in this noble crusade.

Please tell me:

Why have they suppressed the works of Fr. Fahey?

Were you genuinely unaware the SSPX suppressed and purged the writings of Fr Denis Fahey? This is old news. The Irish Dictrict publicly bent down to International Jєωry by declaring the 'h0Ɩ0cαųst' beyond discussion. It must be accepted there was a systematic killing of Jєωs by these nasty nαzι/Germans. Utter nonsense but yes, the SSPX appeased Jєωs. This was all before 'Krahgate' and many were not aware of the Zionist control of the 'pious union'.

inspiritu20 · « **Reply #40 on:** January 16, 2013, 11:40:34 AM »

Quote

Were you genuinely unaware the SSPX suppressed and purged the writings of Fr Denis Fahey? This is old news. The Irish Dictrict publicly bent down to International Jєωry by declaring the 'h0Ɩ0cαųst' beyond discussion. It must be accepted there was a systematic killing of Jєωs by these nasty nαzι/Germans. Utter nonsense but yes, the SSPX appeased Jєωs. This was all before 'Krahgate' and many were not aware of the Zionist control of the 'pious union'.

I wasn't aware of it.

Was this Fr Angles' decision, or Fr Morgan's?

John Grace · « **Reply #41 on:** January 16, 2013, 12:31:12 PM »

Quote from: inspiritu20

Quote

Were you genuinely unaware the SSPX suppressed and purged the writings of Fr Denis Fahey? This is old news. The Irish Dictrict publicly bent down to International Jєωry by declaring the 'h0Ɩ0cαųst' beyond discussion. It must be accepted there was a systematic killing of Jєωs by these nasty nαzι/Germans. Utter nonsense but yes, the SSPX appeased Jєωs. This was all before 'Krahgate' and many were not aware of the Zionist control of the 'pious union'.

I wasn't aware of it.

Was this Fr Angles' decision, or Fr Morgan's?

Again very old news and well docuмented.

http://www.cathinfo.com/index.php/The-Irish-District-of-the-SSPX-have-betrayed-Bishop-Williamson

Quote

The Irish District of the SSPX have betrayed Bishop Williamson. They still have this note on their website.

http://ireland.sspx.net/miscellaneous/old%20but%20useful/Motu%20Proprio/note.htm
"NOTE CONCERNING RECENT EVENTS
February 2009

Recent events make it necessary to say a word about the Jєωιѕн h0Ɩ0cαųst.

We want to stress that all the members of the Society in Ireland condemn as false, offensive, and unacceptable any form of anti-Semitism, including the denial or minimization of the Jєωιѕн genocide during World War II. For us it is beyond discussion that a systematic and organized evil plan of persecution and extermination of the Jєωιѕн race took place during the nαzι regime"

Posted Apr 21, 2010, 12:18 am

Incredulous · « **Reply #42 on:** January 16, 2013, 12:32:23 PM »

Quote from: inspiritu20

Quote

Were you genuinely unaware the SSPX suppressed and purged the writings of Fr Denis Fahey? This is old news. The Irish Dictrict publicly bent down to International Jєωry by declaring the 'h0Ɩ0cαųst' beyond discussion. It must be accepted there was a systematic killing of Jєωs by these nasty nαzι/Germans. Utter nonsense but yes, the SSPX appeased Jєωs. This was all before 'Krahgate' and many were not aware of the Zionist control of the 'pious union'.

I wasn't aware of it.

Was this Fr Angles' decision, or Fr Morgan's?

The only thing worse than an Irishman who has lost his Catholic Faith is a judaized Irishman.

John Grace · « **Reply #43 on:** January 16, 2013, 12:35:46 PM »

http://revisionistreview.blogspot.ie/2010/04/some-questions-for-hierarchy-of-society.html

Quote

Tuesday, April 20, 2010
Some Questions for the Hierarchy of the Society of St Pius X (SSPX)

Is the Derogation of Calvary and the Ascendance of Auschwitz "your fight"?

Quote

Anonymous said...
In regard to the notice on the Irish District website it should be noted that the District Superior (a Spaniard who had relatives who fought for the Anarchist butchers against Catholicism during the cινιℓ ωαr; they subsequently died in German labour camps during WWII) ordered that his notice be read out from the pulpit of every SSPX church in Ireland when he produced the statement one year or so ago.

After its first reading-out, at a particular church, the news spread across Ireland so quickly that queues of protesting faithful lined up to literally besiege the priests in other parts of the country with complaints and remonstrations.

Consequently the notice was not read out at several of the churches in Ireland.

All the priests are foreign but the Irish are no fools.

The British District of SSPX and its faithful are not fools either. The attempted pacifying of the тαℓмυdists and the outrageous and disgraceful way that Bishop Williamson has been treated by a few of his confreres is utterly rejected throughout the District.

Neither are the great bulk of French or Italians taken in by this scandalous attempt to kowtow to the тαℓмυdic power.

If it were possible for you to supply French and Italian translations of your work you would surely find an enormous and very appreciative audience, Mr. Hoffman.

Jerome · « **Reply #44 on:** January 16, 2013, 01:20:22 PM »

Quote from: CathMomof7

I attended Mass at the SSPX chapel where Fr. Hewko was one of our priests.

If you want to know what's going on at that chapel today, ask him. See what he tells you.

Our family left when the priest in charge began directing everyone to stay off the internet and he started stalking me here at CathInfo.

Other families left after he assaulted a parishioner.

I attend Mass now at an independent chapel. It's a heck of a lot less crazy than what is happening in the Society.

In my opinion, we all have to be prepared to leave the Society just like people had to be prepared to leave NO.

The Society is NOT the Church.

My husband and I are 100% certain we made the right decision.

Who is this priest that assaulted a parishioner???