Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Is the neo-SSPX against homeschooling?  (Read 65622 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
Re: Is the neo-SSPX against homeschooling?
« Reply #15 on: August 25, 2022, 12:32:05 AM »
Since this is the premise for the rest of your post, are you saying homeschooling is always better than Catholic school or just that the SSPX is basically equivalent to any other modern Catholic school?

I'm saying that:

1. SSPX schools might be for the most part orthodox (not the schismatic) and kosher (not literally I hope). Seriously, they don't have a lot of outright error, but there are downsides. SSPX schools are not without their problems, being as they are IN THE WORLD and drawing FROM THE WORLD for their teachers. They usually don't have enough money (due to lack of students) so they hire young ladies just waiting to find a husband and get married. By the time they have some knowledge and/or experience, they found their husband and they quit their teaching job. The problems become much worse when the school wishes to compete with worldly academic institutions... Let's just say they might hire the wrong kind of teachers.

2. Many (most?) SSPX schools are a joke compared to the pre-Vatican II parochial schools they are trying to emulate or replace. I'm not old enough to remember them personally, but based on reading and talking to older individuals, academic standards and curricula at SSPX schools are a complete joke compared to what could be had at a Catholic school in the 1950's. This runs closely parallel to SSPX Seminary curricula vs. what used to be normal at a Seminary pre-Vatican II. Ladislaus can elaborate on this one.

3. It's hard to teach groups of kids as effectively as a mother/father can do one-on-one -- when such an option is possible. One-on-one attention is always going to result in the most learning done. That's why private lessons are more expensive than "small group" lessons, which are more expensive than regular classes. Not everyone has the money, time, or ability to homeschool -- but that doesn't mean homeschooling isn't the best.

4. Jesus Christ was homeschooled.

5. The PRIMARY responsibility for raising and educating children rests with the PARENTS. Not just education in the Faith, but in everything. It's one of those inalienable rights that parents have. As in, if the State tries to take this away, it's time to fight. Now parents are free to delegate that task to the Church (parochial/private schools) or even the State (God forbid, since about 2000), but it's still the parents' responsibility to educate their children. No one else's. That's why it's laughable that SSPX priest(s) are claiming mortal sin for those who chose to NOT avail themselves of SSPX schools. IT'S THEIR CHOICE.

Re: Is the neo-SSPX against homeschooling?
« Reply #16 on: August 25, 2022, 04:03:04 AM »
Not everyone has the money, time, or ability to homeschool -- but that doesn't mean homeschooling isn't the best.

This doesn't square. If the parents do not have the time and ability to homeschool, the results could be disastrous compared to sending to a school (SSPX or non-SSPX). I do agree with you that ultimately it's the parents' choice and right on the education of their children.


Re: Is the neo-SSPX against homeschooling?
« Reply #17 on: August 25, 2022, 03:53:44 PM »
To be fair, "back in the day", if you had a parish school, you had no need to homeschool, you could rest assured that your children were being taught the fullness of the Faith, and the teachers were at least reasonably competent to teach non-religious subjects as well.  Therefore if the SSPX is seeking to restore what we had "back in the day", they have a somewhat good case.  And so far as I am aware, the 1917 CIC didn't anticipate homeschooling.  Homeschooling would only have existed in "the back of beyond" where there was no school at all, Catholic or otherwise.

Very few of us have "back in the day" circuмstances anymore.
I would argue that none of us have "back in the day" circuмstances anymore.

I sent one of my children to an sspx boarding school.  Worst idea ever.  Learned about porn, perverts, uncontrolled internet access, bad language, bullying, and how to be sneaky among others.

They had a high-school graduate teaching 9th grace English, and a math professor who thought a child should not receive "A" grades if the child didn't show the work (did it in their head).  

One of my nieces taught 5th grade at an sspx school when she had only just graduated high school.

Homeschooling is the only way to go. 

Re: Is the neo-SSPX against homeschooling?
« Reply #18 on: August 25, 2022, 07:10:04 PM »
4. Jesus Christ was homeschooled.
Supplemented by the 3-days-long teaching of the doctors in the temple (Lk. 2:40-52).

Re: Is the neo-SSPX against homeschooling?
« Reply #19 on: August 25, 2022, 07:11:33 PM »
math professor who thought a child should not receive "A" grades if the child didn't show the work
What's wrong with that?