Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 ... 20
71
Anσnymσus Posts Allowed / Re: What is the primary reason that you are less active, or no longer active, on CI?
« Last post by Änσnymσus on Yesterday at 07:25:54 PM »
Quote from: Änσnymσus on August 12, 2025, 09:05:17 AM
Boomer is not about age but about beliefs, these people in particular tend to have typical Jєωιѕн subversion as their beliefs.
>oh immigration is good
>finding a job is easy
>women can wear pants and dress worse than prostitutes
>you can marry a women after she has had her fun
>trust the government
>take vaccines so I won't get hurt by the flu
etc etc
Sorry, but these don’t describe me at all. Just because I was born during an era of God’s choosing doesn't mean I fit into a man’s category. 
  
>Not Jєωιѕн!
>Most of modern clay immigration is not good. The Christian world and nations are invaded by those who are not legal, who hate Christ and His Church, who refuse to assimilate to national laws and public custom, who steal, assault, rape, traffic, are pedos, murderers, entitled, have low or no morals, who do whatever it takes to impose their pagan culture on Christians, who hate Catholics in particular 
>It’s not 1965. Finding a decent job, sometimes any job is difficult.
>Well, women are able (can, and society is okay with it) to wear pants and dress worse than prostitutes, but I wear skirts and dresses, always have, and I certainly don’t dress like a prostitute, much less worse than one. I’m not sure what that would look like, nothing but tattoos?
>Again, a man CAN marry a woman with a past full of promiscuity if that’s what is meant by fun, but no man wants that, even if his past isn’t much better. I haven’t had a fun past and expected Prince Charming to ask my hand in marriage. Female and male Boomers of guilty of this trait. Not to brag, but this doesn’t describe me.
>I haven’t trusted the government since the day Nixon resigned.
>I chose getting fired over getting vaxxed. I’ve refused other vaccines prior to the Scamdemic.
72
Crisis in the Church / neoSSPX as Judas Goat
« Last post by Incredulous on Yesterday at 07:21:44 PM »
Consider the similarities.



The Judas Goat leads his sheep to slaughter
while his own life is spared.



Pope Leo XIV wearing a serpentine chasuble 
and toting Scorzelli's sacrilegious crozier.



Bob Prevost... or "Chicago Bob", groomed by the ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ satanist 
Cardinal Bernadine and Bergolio, proudly wears their same anti-Christ pectoral cross.

Bernadine-Bergolio-Prevost anti-Christ pectoral cross




       The most "pious" SSPX Leadership

(Jєωιѕн bribes, Novus ordo priests and homo-scandals)



Leading their naive TLM remnant to the modernist slaughter.
73
SSPX Resistance News / Re: Interview with Fr. Pivert
« Last post by Plenus Venter on Yesterday at 07:16:49 PM »
Benedikt and girlytrad, you would do well to consider this opinion of Archbishop Lefebvre taken from Michael Davies' Apologia Pro Marcel Lefebvre Vol II Ch XL:

I had the opportunity of a long interview with the Archbishop a few weeks later when we discussed the matter. He was kind enough to summarize his considered opinion for me in writing (dated 9 May 1980). It read as follows:
Quote
Those who feel themselves obliged in conscience to assist at the New Mass on Sunday can fulfil their Sunday obligation. But one cannot accuse a person of a grave fault because he prefers not to assist at Mass on Sunday rather than assist at the New Mass.
Thus where the Archbishop states that “these New Masses are incapable of fulfilling our Sunday obligation,” he is referring to New Masses which involve “sacrilegious acts which pervert the faith by diminishing it.” The declaration which he made at my request makes it quite clear that this was indeed his meaning.


Now consider the difference between an SSPX Mass and a New Mass. The conclusion is obvious.
74
Catholic Living in the Modern World / Cushion for kneeling?
« Last post by AnthonyPadua on Yesterday at 07:14:21 PM »
I am thinking of getting myself a cushion/pad for kneeling. Currently using my pillows but they aren't very thick. I've briefly looked online but there are so many options I am not sure what to get. Any recommendations?
75
Catholic Living in the Modern World / Re: Bad news for Cassini
« Last post by PAT317 on Yesterday at 07:06:28 PM »
Be assured of my prayers for you.  :pray:
76
Catholic Living in the Modern World / Re: Bad news for Cassini
« Last post by Seraphina on Yesterday at 06:55:34 PM »
Quote from: Incredulous on Yesterday at 05:19:48 PM
Dear Cassini,

Thank you for letting us know about this Cross.

We Church Militant and your friends on this forum, will pray for your courageous fight and recovery.

In Maria,
Incred
  
:pray: My sentiments too. I’ve added you to my prayer list and will add you to another two prayer lists under your CI name.
Love, Seraphina 

 
77
The Sacred: Catholic Liturgy, Chant, Prayers / Re: Even an ejaculatory prayer…
« Last post by Mark 79 on Yesterday at 06:55:28 PM »
Thank you!
78
Catholic Living in the Modern World / Re: Bad news for Cassini
« Last post by Mark 79 on Yesterday at 06:49:32 PM »
:pray::pray::pray:
79
Art and Literature for Catholics / Re: Mel Gibson's sequel
« Last post by Incredulous on Yesterday at 06:09:42 PM »
Quote from: Pax Vobis on August 13, 2025, 09:02:37 PM
While I hate the Protestants' anti-catholic, anti-Mary "re-interpretation" of Genesis, I always took the crushing of the serpent's head in the garden as Christ, who allowed His human nature to be tempted, decided at that moment to accept His death and reject the weakness of His humanity, as an example to all of us.

As much as it's true that Our Lady will "crush satan's head", we have to remember that Christ's death on the Cross was/is not the end of this prophecy.  Christ died, the Church was born, and 2,000 years later, we're still fighting satan.  Our Lady's victory is not yet complete.

But in the case of the Garden, and with Christ on the cross, He alone is Our Redeemer.  He alone sufficed to God the Father.  It is true that it was His victory, alone, who saved us from sin.  (Our Lady does play a mystical part in all of this, without question).

But the larger story, post-Crucifixion, post-Resurrection...THAT is when Our Lady took a part in helping the Apostles and praying for the Church.  So Her "crushing the head of satan" is ongoing and also, yet to come (God will give Her the final victory).

So, I think both are true.  Christ did crush satan's head through His crucifixion, because satan ruled all the world through sin.  But Our Lady will also crush satan's head at the end of time, through the Church, as the battle for souls wages on.  Our Lady plays a part in both victories, because the story from Eden long ago, is not finished until the end of time.

The prottys always focus on Christ's redemption and think that "the story is over" because "Christ died once and for all", and they believe "once saved, always saved".  This is their error.  Life goes on, the battle goes on, and Our Lady plays the most important part.  Of course, the prottys have no idea about this.

You have an artistic imagination.

Note: Freemasons state publicly that masonry contributed to Mel's unique creativity and Hollywood success.
80
Art and Literature for Catholics / Re: Mel Gibson's sequel
« Last post by Incredulous on Yesterday at 06:04:41 PM »
Quote from: rum on August 14, 2025, 01:26:10 PM
I was misled as well. I believed in this nonevent until my late-20s. But I didn't have a best friend for over 20 years (as Caviezel has had in Gibson) who knew it didn't happen, and my good friend's father as well (Hutton). In my conversations with this good friend, who made me millions of dollars (as Gibson has made Caviezel), I never thought (or my good friend never thought) to converse on this topic? Yeah, right.

As you can see in the clip I posted Caviezel is virtue-signalling and depicting himself as a hero. It's noxious behavior. He's saying "at Auschwitz, I would have been there. When slavery was legal, I would have been there." Meaning he would have "fought the good fight". Ooh so brave of him. You can be sure Caviezel wouldn't mention the role jws played in the trade. It's a noxious pattern of behavior he's exhibiting.

His entire demeanor as a public figure reeks of play-acting virtue. It's insufferable behavior. Has this guy ever laughed at a fart joke?

Caviezel has never once in his public life called out the jws. He's some sort of psy-op. Perhaps Gibson and Caviezel are psy-ops without even knowing it.

I've corrected you in the past about Anne Barnhardt and Nostradamus, without any thanks from you. I rarely read your posts. Who knows what other goofy stuff you promote that I could also provide some correction.

I think of the line "if it doesn't gel, it isn't aspic." Anyone with a Catholic sense, or even a decent pagan sense, would spot a phony in Caviezel. He really reeks.

  

Like his masonic bud Mel, Hollywood Jim... has always had something in his left eye. 

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 ... 20