https://laportelatine.org/activite/pelerinages/rendez-vous-a-rome-video

Link for a 1 minute Italian language video promoting the neoSspx pilgrimage. Very beautiful churches, clips at high speed showing St Peter's. Online registration is required to enter some churches/events. June was deadline. There are a couple of references to eternal Rome. 

I forgot about that poster with rainbow coats, ~~walking ~~ on ~~water~~, (St. PETER walked on the sea), deformed cross. 
  See!  this will provide neoSspx with significant media coverage...SSPX listed on the OFFICIAL list of Pilgrimages!  (What did they do to get permission from the Vatican? hmmm... I hope they criticize Vatican II, new Code of Canon law,  new catechisms , new rites, new everything-  in their faces...on prime time TV. )
Pray.

While I hate the Protestants' anti-catholic, anti-Mary "re-interpretation" of Genesis, I always took the crushing of the serpent's head in the garden as Christ, who allowed His human nature to be tempted, decided at that moment to accept His death and reject the weakness of His humanity, as an example to all of us.

As much as it's true that Our Lady will "crush satan's head", we have to remember that Christ's death on the Cross was/is not the end of this prophecy.  Christ died, the Church was born, and 2,000 years later, we're still fighting satan.  Our Lady's victory is not yet complete.

But in the case of the Garden, and with Christ on the cross, He alone is Our Redeemer.  He alone sufficed to God the Father.  It is true that it was His victory, alone, who saved us from sin.  (Our Lady does play a mystical part in all of this, without question).

But the larger story, post-Crucifixion, post-Resurrection...THAT is when Our Lady took a part in helping the Apostles and praying for the Church.  So Her "crushing the head of satan" is ongoing and also, yet to come (God will give Her the final victory).

So, I think both are true.  Christ did crush satan's head through His crucifixion, because satan ruled all the world through sin.  But Our Lady will also crush satan's head at the end of time, through the Church, as the battle for souls wages on.  Our Lady plays a part in both victories, because the story from Eden long ago, is not finished until the end of time.

The prottys always focus on Christ's redemption and think that "the story is over" because "Christ died once and for all", and they believe "once saved, always saved".  This is their error.  Life goes on, the battle goes on, and Our Lady plays the most important part.  Of course, the prottys have no idea about this.

Must priests who come to Tradition be re-ordained?

This article by Fr. Peter Scott first appeared in the September 2007 issue of The Angelus magazine.


https://sspx.org/en/must-priests-who-come-tradition-be-re-ordained-30479

So, that's one reason that one of the brightest minds in SSPX has been relegated to a mud hut in Nigeria, and not only that, as an "assistant priest", not even the Prior there.

I'll nevertheless have to disagree with much of his rationale here, where he concludes things like ...

If it cannot be said, as with Anglican orders, that the Novus Ordo rite was changed with the manifest intention of rejecting a sacrificing priesthood, nevertheless the deliberate exclusion of the notion of propitiation, in order to please Protestants, could easily be considered as casting a doubt on the intention of doing what the Church does, namely of offering a true and propitiatory sacrifice. Of course, this doubt would not exist if the ordaining bishop had indicated otherwise his truly Catholic intention of doing what the Church does.

Why, Father Scott, "cannot [that] be said"?  I think it's quite clear that it's PRECISELY why they were doing that, excising every single reference to the power of the priest to offer the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, not even leaving one reference behind by accident?  In fact, many of the Deformers of the Catholic Rites publicly ADMITTED that it was their intention with both the Mass and the Orrders to make them non-offensive to Prots, i.e. to make them "in many ways to suit the errors of the reformers" ) [Apostolicae Curae 30].  Father should have quoted the entire thing.  Notice that Leo XIII didn't even say the Anglicans were "rejecting a sacrificing priesthood" (as Father Scott falsely puts in the mind of Pope Leo), when Pope Leo actually said that they were merely attempting to SUIT the "errors of the reformers".  How is that not exactly what the Conciliar Deformers were doing?

So, yes, Father, it absolutely CAN be said that this was their INTENTION, and again, the intention as manifest in the external forum, by what they DID, not what they may or may not have intended in the internal forum.

This was consistent with the SSPX "have your cake and eat it too" theology, where they wanted to regularly do conditionals, perhaps because they knew the faithful would not accept anything else and keep donating, but without then having to fight off the attacks from the SVs about the legitimacy of the V2 papal claimants.  It's just like with the FrankenChurch theology of "Eternal Rome" and "Modernist Rome" ... where they could have their pope and eat him too, technical have a guy was was part "Eternal Pope" (whom they could pay lip service to and put up pictures of in their vestibules, so as not to scare off new visitors and contributors to their collections, and part "Modernist Pope" (that they could rip to pieces and justify their whole apostolate).

I'm tired of Bishops banning the Latin Mass. Just look up videos of people riding a bike around the Euchurist during Mass. A Priest using a garden hose to bless the people. It is like theyre almost trying to joke around with something very Holy and Sacred. Not all Churches do this of course but there's a good chance that if you go to a Novus Ordo that they'll be doing these hereticke things. How about instead of worrying about a Priest doing something bad like allowing gαy people to relieve the Euchrist in the future let's make Mass more stricter. Like the TLM. It is the last reverent way of celebrating Mass.