Let's say $5 to $50.

I'm somewhat particular to red wines.  And more specifically, Chilean wines. So this post will be exclusively Chilean wines (I'll make another post on U.S. wines). 

In that price range, here is what I'd recommend trying:

Casillero del Diablo by Concha y Toro ~$10. This is a good all-around wine, but it should be breathed.  Upon proper breathing, this $10/bottle wine turns into a $20/bottle wine.  Also, not only is Concha y Toro the largest vineyard in Chile, it's the 3rd largest in the world, so it shouldn't be too difficult to find this in wine shops.  I'm particular to their Carmenere.


Primus The Blend ~$15  A Chilean Bordeaux Blend.



Cousiño-Macul Antiguas Reservas ~$20


LaPostolle ~$20 - $75  Very unique vineyard in that the none of their wine goes through any pumps in that the building is built into the side of a hill wherein the grapes are brought to the top, and the entire process uses gravity to go from vat to bottling. 



Perez Cruz ~$20  This is a smaller vineyard located about 45 minutes outside of Santiago, Chile.  I've never had a bad bottle from Perez Cruz.


Marques de Casa Concha ~20  One of my personal favorites, primarily because it is easily found in a lot of wine shops.  Also, the main vineyard is located on the outskirts of Santiago, Chile.


BTW, I've toured/visited the vineyards where each of the above wines are made.

Isn't there the Pauline/Petrine privelege for marriage, where if a person converts to the Faith and his unbaptized spouse won't convert, they can remarry a Catholic and receive the full sacrament?  It's a rare case, but it may apply to this thread.

Lay people can't apply the Pauline/Petrine privilege to their own situation.  Only a Tribunal or the Rota can issue an declaration.  And there is no traditional authority to do so.  The OP must separate from the new "wife".

2017 / 2018
https://fsspx.news/en/news/interview-bishop-bernard-fellay-fatima-centenary-church-crisis-18544

...Maike Hickson:What is, in your own view, the reason for the continued hesitancy of those people in the Church who could disclose, for the greater good, much more information? What do they still have to fear or to lose? Would such a disclosure not be an act of mercy toward the suffering Church in this deep crisis?

+Fellay: " I remember that Sr. Lucy, in an interview with a cardinal from India in the mid-1990s, was very afraid that the Pope would publish the Secret. She said, if she were to give the Holy Father advice, she would caution great prudence. If, for instance, the text contained something like the coming of the Antichrist or something else quite serious that would cast grave doubt on the authority of the Church, it could be a reason the same authorities are hesitant to publish this. I don’t pretend these examples are the case; I am simply speculating as to what some possible reasons might be for not releasing it. "

Never heard of this before, but just one more example of what the "Fake sister Lucy" would  spout. We all know that BVMary/ Sister Lucia wanted the secret opened by 1960 !!!

P.S.  Did the newSociety say that the Fatima Apparitions were private??? Oh yeah, just greatest miracle witnessed by 70,000 souls. !! ● • ● ○
Talk about the letter of the law that killeth. 
BTW we are the Church M ilitant!  Pray!

Dear Striving Catholic,

Thank you for sharing your story. It took a lot of courage, I'm sure.

I was going to reply with some information relating to your original post, but I can imagine that the replies to your story have thrown you into anguish and turmoil.

My advice to you now is to immediately seek the counsel of a traditional Roman Catholic priest. Let him examine your case, and tell you for certain if your previous marriage is valid.

I suggest contacting Immaculate Heart Seminary in Round Top, NY.

Send them a message via email. I find these priests very charitable.

Just Google it, and the website will come up.

A priest's opinion doesn't give you certainty as you suggest, only the Church can give you certainty with a declaration of nullity, which is at present, unfortunately, unavailable. The SSPV is so indifferentist that it doesn't even require general confessions for people converting from the Novus Ordo. It's useless to gamble on the opinion of some priest and then if one doesn't like that priest's opinion he can go in search of another fallible opinion.

Catholic principles in this case are clear-cut and anyone can apply them for himself - unbaptized non-Catholics marry validly when they seek a civil marriage, that's certain, the question is only if that's what happened and StrivingCatholic knows that for himself. In any case, to go seek another marriage a declaration of nullity would be required, which he cannot get, since there is no competent authority to provide it at present.

In short, one can and should seek advice from knowledgeable priests or laymen, however, one can't go seek certainty from a priest's opinion.

P.S. The marriage is assumed valid until proven otherwise beyond any doubt, not the other way around.

Dear Striving Catholic,

Thank you for sharing your story. It took a lot of courage, I'm sure. 

I was going to reply with some information relating to your original post, but I can imagine that the replies to your story have thrown you into anguish and turmoil. 

My advice to you now is to immediately seek the counsel of a traditional Roman Catholic priest. Let him examine your case, and tell you for certain if your previous marriage is valid. 

I suggest contacting Immaculate Heart Seminary in Round Top, NY. 

Send them a message via email. I find these priests very charitable. 

Just Google it, and the website will come up.