« Last post by Incredulous on Today at 07:54:36 PM »
Recently heard that the rank & file SSPX priests are condoning and welcoming of Bp. Schneider.
What pathetic neo-trad-theater.
Effectively, you have just insulted 2V by implying calling her a woman is rude.She knows what I meant.
Very manly/unfeminine.Sean, please cease sporting your manly superiority over a woman. it is unbecoming of a Catholic gentleman.
What's more repulsive than a combative woman?
JIf wait and see has been the attitude of sspx since the Archbishop’s declaration, then isn’t it reasonable to conclude that ABL himself helped foster that attitude. In fact, he may have been its architect. So then, why jump all over the neo-sspx under the direction of Fellay & Co.? They were only continuing the legacy left by their founder.oThe Archbishop's response was an understandable position in the beginning when no one new exactly what was going to happen and how far the conciliar traitors would take things, however, he maintained the same position until his death, quite a few decades from the beginning of the revolution, and from 1988. he should have known where things were going, when John Paul II excommunicated him while using a heretical definition of Tradition in the act, as a justification. He could have been confronted right there in 1988 for using this conciliar definition which contradicted both Vatican I and The Council of Trent. A clear point of doctrine was not defended and the society and Tradition suffered for many years.
I know that many sspxers claim that ABL learned his lesson after the 1988 Protocol debacle. If so, I would have to entertain the thought that the organization's founder came a little bit late to the dance. Why would it be unreasonable to think in this way?
Trying to get traditional Catholics to stop thinking about the Grand Jury Report?This is a parish in Berlin, New Jersey. Philadelphia is across the river and it's where they do this annually, anyway.