Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 20
2
Are you thinking of CM and Fr Pierre D.? Hard to find anything on that case. Jassy and her contacts would be a "gold mine" for CM?

Re: a prior case,  I just came across this nugget:

French. To translate more simply select some text, highlight, then in 4 seconds a translate icon appears near the end of the selected text, tap and voila!

https://www.reddit.com/r/france/comments/63kcpe/abus_sexuels_les_dossiers_cach%C3%A9s_des_int%C3%A9gristes/?rdt=62455

"...However, well before the departure of Father Peignot, in 1991, the successive superiors of the Saint-Pie-X fraternity were warned of the attacks committed by this abbot on at least three minor boys in Belgium and France at the end of the 1980s. , without ever notifying the courts. The fraternity was content to move the priest between France and Belgium. It will be necessary to wait until the end of 2009 for an internal procedure to be triggered.

"For SSP X, no protocol was in place to deal with such situations. » However, in 2000, Mgr Fellay, superior of the fraternity since 1994, aware of the dangerousness of Father Peignot, (introduced??, the French word 'casse' means to break ) a first measure prohibiting any apostolate of the priest among young people....[Why was that priest still active at a Scout event in 2002? Ed.]

"...to the reality of speaking of an adapted measure, confining this priest to the role of simple chaplain, without any activity with the children", tries to convince the fraternity. Measures not respected by Father Peignot. The priest will remain in office with a pack of scouts in Conflans-Sainte-Honorine (Yvelines) until 2002, according to the victim who initiated his investigation..."
La fraternité Saint-Pie-X se défend par la voix de l’abbé Thouvenot : « Dans les années quatre-vingt, et bien que cela soit plus que regrettable, tant Rome que notre société de vie apostolique étaient dépourvues de procédure canonique définie et aucun protocole n’était en place pour faire face à de telles situations. »
A better translation ( unofficial, loose attempt) would be: The SSPX is defended by the voice of Fr. Thouvenot: "In the '80's, and that is what is so regrettable, Rome as well as our Society of apostolic life was deprived of any defined canonical procedure to deal head on with such situations.
:confused:
Pray!


3
Fighting Errors in the Modern World / Re: Wolfgang Smith retires
« Last post by Nadir on Today at 12:21:24 AM »
:pray:
4
Crisis in the Church / Re: This is now being promoted
« Last post by Kephapaulos on Today at 12:13:35 AM »
This happened with Philip II of Spain. I was just reading also that it was not initially supported and even by St. Pius V, but it still happened that he was able to marry his niece somehow. I would guess it is surely an impediment now that cannot be dispensed, but I don't know. In those days, it would have probably required a dispensation since there was a relationship of consanguinity. It did not completely work though since the heir Philip III was the only child who survived the longest, and the direct male line itself died out eventually, resulting in the situations of the Spanish War of Succession and later the now ongoing dispute between the Legitimists and Orleanists over the succession to the French throne.

It only goes to show that the Portuguese man in question is not making a wise decision, even if were not to lead to something like that described above, although just merely for reasons of common sense to not marry a relative too closely related through consanguinity. 
5
Fighting Errors in the Modern World / Re: Wolfgang Smith retires
« Last post by Kephapaulos on Yesterday at 11:56:54 PM »
:pray:
6
Crisis in the Church / Re: Not one mention of Modernism
« Last post by Kephapaulos on Yesterday at 11:54:24 PM »
They have nothing to lose and but more to gain by promoting St. Pius X, since it keeps up appearances, and they would give themselves away too much if they were too silent or show some kind of disgust toward the saintly pope. If modernism is not mentioned at all, they would want to hide it, of course, but on the other hand, if they do mention it, they may just explain it away and consider it a thing of the past since they being modernists think faith and morals can change. 
7
Like you said no surprise. Biden has over 400 Jєωs running the White-house so one of them has to be the ringleader. 
8
So much for Roe v Wade being "overturned".  I was widely excoriated here for saying that the SCOTUS decision was an unmitigated disaster for Pro Life.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/planned-parenthood-committed-record-392715-abortions-last-year-annual-report/
9
O'Keefe got a White House staffter admit that Jeff Zients (Jєω), Biden's "Chief of Staff", runs the country, tells Biden what to do, say, and think.  No surprise to any of us here, since we already knew this, but good to see the confirmation.

https://twitter.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/1780687148527579215
10
Fighting Errors in the Modern World / Re: The "Taxil Hoax" Hoax
« Last post by Lavinsko on Yesterday at 09:53:39 PM »
Yes, indeed. The book shall be available on Amazon within a couple of months. I will post a link in the thread.
Hello again. Are there any updates on the book?
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 20