Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1


He has an account on CathInfo on his own name, why not use it? I have witnessed Fr. Kramer using different names (2 or 3) to support his own position and being exposed as Fr. Kramer only 2-3 years ago.
2
General Discussion / Re: Graceseeker banned
« Last post by Croix de Fer on Today at 05:13:49 AM »
3
General Discussion / Graceseeker banned
« Last post by Matthew on Today at 04:27:26 AM »
Graceseeker was banned -- need I give a reason? 

1. She wasn't a good fit for this forum. Her upvote/downvote ratio was something like 1:3
2. She was completely brainwashed by Fox News and the Mainstream Media
3. She referred to "anti-Semites" and used this Talmudic Jewish word-bludgeon as if it were a legitimate thing
4. Her last post was, "I Tend to Believe Fox, not the anti-Semites at this site"

Her e-mail address included the phrase "confusedchick". That, at least, had a lot of truth to it.
4
Anonymous Posts Allowed / Re: If you don't vote, you are not a Christian
« Last post by Anonymous on Today at 02:16:07 AM »
Not voting might make you a irresponsible American, but it does not make you an irresponsible Catholic.  There are other, and arguably more effective means to transform society than by voting.
5
you can commit perjury even when telling the truth

I never thought of that before but there was an attorney on Fox News who said that and it makes sense because if a corrupt judge chooses to believe the corrupt plaintiff over defendant or vice versa... what can you do?

and of course, a lot of judges are corrupt..

This country is a hypocrite... we think we are so noble an this and that...
Definition of perjury (merriam webster)
: the voluntary violation of an oath or vow either by swearing to what is untrue or by omission to do what has been promised under oath : false swearing
6
https://boingboing.net/2018/04/19/government-accidentally-sends.html

Government accidentally sends file on "remote mind control" methods to journalist


 
When journalist Curtis Waltman filed a Freedom of Information Act request with Washington State Fusion Center (which is partnered with Department of Homeland Security) to obtain information about Antifa and white supremacist groups, he got more than the information he was looking for – he also accidentally received a mysterious file on "psycho-electric weapons" with the label “EM effects on human body.zip.” The file included methods of "remote mind control."



So what gives?
Via the Daily Beast:
Quote
According to Muckrock, a nonprofit that publishes government information gathered through FOIA requests, the mind-control documents came from the Department of Homeland Security-linked agency in the form of a file called “EM effects on human body.zip.” The file reportedly contained various diagrams detailing the horrors of “psycho-electronic weapon effects.”
One diagram lists the various forms of torment supposedly made possible by using remote mind-control methods, from “forced memory blanking” and “sudden violent itching inside eyelids” to “wild flailing” followed by “rigor mortis” and a remotely induced “forced orgasm.” It was not immediately clear how the documents wound up in the agency’s response to a standard FOIA request, but there was reportedly no indication the “remote mind control” files stemmed from any government program.
And according to Popular Mechanics:
Quote
The federal government has absolutely experimented with mind control in a variety of methods, but the documents here do not appear to be official.
Waltman had no idea why these documents were included in his request and isn't sure why the government is holding them. The WSFC did not respond to requests for more information.
As fun as conspiracy theories are, Muckrock doesn't believe the images are "government material."
Quote
One seems to come from a person named “Supratik Saha,” who is identified as a software engineer, the brain mapping slide has no sourcing, and the image of the body being assaulted by psychotronic weapons is sourced from raven1.net, who apparently didn’t renew their domain.
Muckrock put out a call to WSFC but hasn't yet heard back from them.
7
General Discussion / Anticamera Segreta
« Last post by roscoe on Today at 01:43:32 AM »
Does anyone know anything about the Anticamera Segreta? I believe Card Del Val was a member.. ???
8
I agree with Samuel and Sean on the fact that this Sedevacantist issue is more than just an opinion.  Will there be any consequences in the here after for following such a position and if so is your forum Mathew contributing to this consequence.  Are people turning to sedevacantism because of your forum?  Like the owner of a library or bookstore there has to be attached some accountability to what conclusions are drawn from certain post.  I think your success on CI is because you allow all sides; however, that can be a dangerous road IMO.  I could understand your position more if you would go to non unum cum but from what I derive you would not.  This tells me that you have a strong conviction that they are wrong. So why this tolerance?  If you ran a chapel would you be ok with the 7:00 am SSPX mass and the 9:00 am Resistance and the 11:00 Non unum cum?   
9
The only answer that comes to me at this time is

he is a liberal

that explains so many things.

Sudan was going to give Clinton Bin Laden on the proverbial silver platter

but I guess Clinton was too busy having fun with Lewinksy or something
They didn't even realize that Bin Laden was planning to attack the WTC until after it happened and we attacked and destabilized Afghanistan. Bin Laden was a Saudi national and in Afghanistan, they speak Dari and Pashto. Not anywhere near the same language, or even the same language family, for that matter.

You can blame George W. Bush for not getting Bin Laden. He seems like a decent guy and I'm sorry his mother died and his father will soon follow. But that guy's a grade-A retard.
10
SSPX Resistance News / Re: Is Father Ringrose dumping the R & R crowd?
« Last post by Centroamerica on Yesterday at 10:37:51 PM »

Don Paolo,

Why do you speak of Fr. Kramer in the third person? You ARE, Fr. Kramer. 
I don't really think he is trying to mask his identity at all. He already had posted this publicly on his Facebook page before he commented publicly about having posted it here. No need to get all aggressive about it. Especially when you consider that "Don" and the first name is the normal way of naming a priest in Italian. 
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10