Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
You always change the direction of the discussion, rather than address what has been given. That's just so very....freemasonic, and Jewish.
I would like to know how or where this accusation came from. I know that these groups are the enemies of the Catholic Church but how does changing the direction of the discussion, which happens constantly on these sub-forums, mean freemasons or jews. There is rarely any logical thought process, based on fact, that gets posted from this poster.
She seriously must be a troll.
2
Crisis in the Church / Re: Stay away for heretics.
« Last post by Ladislaus on Today at 08:30:16 AM »
.....or call him "your holiness?"..................

:laugh1:
3
Facts are facts. And the Church Fathers clearly taught that the globe earth was an error.

People thought, like at VII that the change didn't really matter too much. After all, it's so far away and doesn't really affect us right? Wrong of course. But that's human beings for you.
This is a lie. The Church Fathers as a whole did not teach GE was an error. Only one condemned it and a few expressed that their personal belief was that the Earth was flat. Others clearly believed in a Globe Earth and/or taught that it was definitely not a matter of religion necessary for Salvation.
https://www.cathinfo.com/the-library/church-fathers-did-not-condemn-flat-earth/
4
General Discussion / Re: Armenians restore female diaconate
« Last post by Ladislaus on Today at 08:29:46 AM »
Sounds like it might be the "Catholic" ones but not 100% ... 

"Catholicosate of Cilicia"
5
SSPX Resistance News / Re: Catechism Class
« Last post by 2Vermont on Today at 08:26:58 AM »
I don't think you can separate out those issues.  The pope is the Bishop of Rome.  Therefore, if the NREC is invalid or at least doubtful, then the papacy of a man consecrated by it is logically called into question...which is why the SSPX changed its tune in 2005.
6
That's not what SB was saying.  You pointed out that the Church taught aspects of what it condemned as if you rejoice in it.  This is a common behavior among the globalists.  The Church didn't teach wrongly, the people in the Church accept error.  The Church Herself can do no wrong.  
The Church can never teach error. Also, immunity from error is promised in matters of faith and morals, not science. Therefore, when men of the Church attempt to condemn purely scientific principles, it's not protected by infallibility. Therefore, GC, HC, FE, GE are all matters of science and one is free to believe in any of those.
7
Anonymous Posts Allowed / The Reluctant Saint
« Last post by Anonymous on Today at 08:14:24 AM »
This Saint had a mental handicap.  He over came it with hard work and prayer.  

https://youtu.be/eXxOLNRBdXw   
8
SSPX Resistance News / Re: Catechism Class
« Last post by SeanJohnson on Today at 08:13:47 AM »
Here are a couple arguments in favor of the validity of the new Rite of Episcopal Consecration:

1) http://www.angelusonline.org/index.php?section=articles&subsection=print_article&article_id=2551

2) http://sspx.org/en/validity-new-rite-episcopal-consecrations (Note: This is actually the study of Fr. Pierre Marie, O.P. - Avrille)


Here are a few against the validity of the new Rite of Episcopal Consecration:

1) http://www.traditionalmass.org/images/articles/NewEpCelierWeb.pdf

2) http://www.traditionalmass.org/images/articles/NewEpConsArtPDF2.pdf

3) http://www.traditionalmass.org/images/articles/NotTruBps1.pdf

4) http://www.fathercekada.com/2012/06/21/saved-by-context-the-68-rite-of-episcopal-consecration-2/

Or, if you are not a reader:

5) http://www.fathercekada.com/2013/11/06/1968-rite-of-episcopal-consecration-valid-or-no/

Note: Fr. Cekada is a sedevacantist, and (as most know) I do not endorse his position on the issue of the Pope.  But the determination of the validity or invalidity of the 1968 Rite of Episcopal Consecration is a separate issue, and one which need not be confined to sedevacantist circles.
9
General Discussion / Re: Armenians restore female diaconate
« Last post by Viva Cristo Rey on Today at 08:09:19 AM »
More and more novus ordo parishes have adult women on the altar as servers.  

Women as lectures, handing out communion while their children and grand children aren't going to novus ordo service at all.  Or many of these women who have children or grand children who are on drugs. 
10
SSPX Resistance News / Re: Catechism Class
« Last post by SeanJohnson on Today at 07:45:22 AM »
Seems to me that this hasn't been on their radar since they changed their position on the validity of the New Rite of Episcopal Consecration in 2005 when Ratzinger became "pope".

Agreed.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10