Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 14
1
Fighting Errors in the Modern World / Re: The Precursor vs The Mark
« Last post by StLouisIX on Today at 09:14:59 PM »
Recommended listening: Bishop Williamson explains the Mark of the Beast, from his seminary lectures on the Book of the Apocalypse: 


https://odysee.com/@PromotorFidei:d/Bishop-Williamson-on-the-Meaning-of-the-Mark:0
2
In the Apocalypse, the word for "medicine" is pharmakeia. That is the Greek root of our modern word "pharmaceutical." Here is the verse where it is used to describe "the Fall of Babylon" in Chapter 18:


The word for the purveyors of pharmakeia, the pharmakos is mentioned three times in the Apocalypse.

So the thing by which "all the nations were led astray" just happens to be something that uses the same words that we use for "medicine" and "doctors" in our world? I don't think it is a coincidence.
Yes, I've seen the pharmakeia passage, but it has no connection with the Mark of the beast.
3
Fact: Jorge Bergoglio worshipped the pachamama idol in the Vatican gardens.
Fact: Nishant Xavier claims Bergoglio is Catholic and has defended him in recent threads here on Cathinfo.

How can you seriously claim that Nishant is Catholic?

He’s not Catholic.  He’s a Novus Ordo apostate.

There’s an interesting episode recorded in Church history of Hypatius hearing Nestorian preach heresy from the pulpit.  He immediately broke communion with Nestorius.  Bishop Eulalius rebuked Hypatius for breaking communion with the heretic before a declaration from Rome.  But Bishop Eulalius agreed that Nestorius was a heretic.  Later Rome did excommunicate Nestorius and at the same time praised Hypatius for breaking communion immediately.  Bishop Eulalius was neither praised nor condemned and Hypatius did not break communion with Eulalius at any time.

How does Nishant compare?  Bergoglio is not merely a heretic but he is an idol-worshipping apostate, the worst of the worst.  Nishant not only didn’t break communion with him, but he defends him as a faithful Catholic.  But that’s not enough for Nishant, he had to attack the Catholics who did break communion with the apostate and then convert some of them to the filthy apostate Novus Ordo religion.  Nishant ought to be condemned and avoided by all good Catholics.  Don’t expect Our Lord to praise you if you remain in communion with apostates.

Great post! 👍👍👍
4
I've pointed out before that Xavier is not actually a Traditional Catholic, but rather a traditonal Catholic.  Traditional Catholics (with the capital T) hold that V2 and the NOM represet ruptures with Tradition and are harmful.  Xavier holds that the traditional forms are simply more perfect.
Fact: Jorge Bergoglio worshipped the pachamama idol in the Vatican gardens.
Fact: Nishant Xavier claims Bergoglio is Catholic and has defended him in recent threads here on Cathinfo.

How can you seriously claim that Nishant is Catholic?

He’s not Catholic.  He’s a Novus Ordo apostate.

There’s an interesting episode recorded in Church history of Hypatius hearing Nestorian preach heresy from the pulpit.  He immediately broke communion with Nestorius.  Bishop Eulalius rebuked Hypatius for breaking communion with the heretic before a declaration from Rome.  But Bishop Eulalius agreed that Nestorius was a heretic.  Later Rome did excommunicate Nestorius and at the same time praised Hypatius for breaking communion immediately.  Bishop Eulalius was neither praised nor condemned and Hypatius did not break communion with Eulalius at any time.

How does Nishant compare?  Bergoglio is not merely a heretic but he is an idol-worshipping apostate, the worst of the worst.  Nishant not only didn’t break communion with him, but he defends him as a faithful Catholic.  But that’s not enough for Nishant, he had to attack the Catholics who did break communion with the apostate and then convert some of them to the filthy apostate Novus Ordo religion.  Nishant ought to be condemned and avoided by all good Catholics.  Don’t expect Our Lord to praise you if you remain in communion with apostates.
5
Fighting Errors in the Modern World / Re: The Precursor vs The Mark
« Last post by Angelus on Today at 08:44:18 PM »
Exactly. We need to maintain the correct idea here within the Protestant conspiracy fog of the shot being the Mark. Not one Church Father, theologian or mystic believes it will be some form of medicine or treatment.


In the Apocalypse, the word for "medicine" is pharmakeia. That is the Greek root of our modern word "pharmaceutical." Here is the verse where it is used to describe "the Fall of Babylon" in Chapter 18:


Quote
23 The light of a lamp will never shine in you again. The voice of bridegroom and bride will never be heard in you again. Your merchants were the world's important people. By your magic spell [pharmakeia] all the nations were led astray.

The word for the purveyors of pharmakeia, the pharmakos is mentioned three times in the Apocalypse. 

So the thing by which "all the nations were led astray" just happens to be something that uses the same words that we use for "medicine" and "doctors" in our world? I don't think it is a coincidence.

6
There is much more to the protocol than just Ivermectin, read all the different protocols according to time: COVID-19 Protocols - FLCCC | Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (covid19criticalcare.com)

I
do not believe this is a weaponized illness, I believe it is just the seasonal flu. What is weaponized is the shot and the killer protocols being administered in some hospitals. The seasonal flu and pneumonia have been killing people forever, the difference now is that the shot has compromised the immune system big time. 
Yes, of course. I was just repeating what I was sent about Bishop Faure. i am aware of the multifocal treatments
7
Health and Nutrition / Re: Corona Flu and Shots Quips Thread
« Last post by DigitalLogos on Today at 08:12:11 PM »
8
.
There is no such thing as being transhuman. A human being is a human being and will remain one until he dies.
.
The mark of the beast is a mark that is given to people who worship the beast. This drug is given to everyone who wants it, and there is nobody worshiping the beast anyway since the beast is not publicly manifested now anyway.
Exactly. We need to maintain the correct idea here within the Protestant conspiracy fog of the shot being the Mark. Not one Church Father, theologian or mystic believes it will be some form of medicine or treatment.

Quote
The only trade-off in this brave new world is that you will no longer have purely human DNA. You will be officially transhuman. Those who choose to become "transhuman," in the way described, will have taken "the Mark." They have chosen human science over God. The technology will be touted as the pathway to practical human immortality since mRNA+CRSPR can be applied to any disease.
This reminds me of the following passage:

"And in those days men shall seek death, and shall not find it: and they shall desire to die, and death shall fly from them."
[Apocalypse 9:6]
9
Health and Nutrition / Re: Corona Flu and Shots Quips Thread
« Last post by DigitalLogos on Today at 08:02:32 PM »
10
Sounds like Fr. Starbuck has bought the propaganda hook, line, and sinker.  
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 14