I just have one question: why? Why is it necessary to have a major HEADLINE lead story with lots of graphics and everything about something which hasn't even happened yet?
Are they trying to beat into everyone's head that they might as well vote for Hillary if they want to be "winners" rather than "losers"?
It sure makes you wonder.
Anyone can print a headline. They're doing all they can, even if it's broadcasting fantasy.
They might as well print "Will the Sky Be Falling" or "Will Devastating Tsunami Inundate Atlantic Coast."
But I'd like to ask, why don't they publish something negative about Hillary? Because it's really easy for anyone to conduct their own, independent poll to find that
it looks like it is Hillary Rodham Clinton who will lose by a landslide, not The Donald.
A headline like this that contradicts all right reason and objective inquiry is just nonsense.
CNN is losing credibility, if it had any left.
What they're really showing the world is that they already have a lot of fancy graphics and layouts ready just in case they get what they want. In fact, they have an overabundance of anti-Trump graphics that they don't want to see go to waste, so they're putting them out there in advance so they get some face time with them.