[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/embed/SpGMxXAIMdY[/youtube]

Text:

It’s all downhill from here.

I mean, 2016 doesn’t look too good.

Trump may want to “rebuild America” but it’s going to be an uphill battle all the way.

[Clip: “We have to rebuild our country. It’s so important, it’s so vital. We have to rebuild our hospitals and our, everything. Our roads, our airports, our country’s a mess, our bridges…did you see the Report, 61% of them are in trouble. What does that mean? You’re driving across and it collapses, and that’s been happening.”]

But you can’t fix bridges without a tax base. For the first time in US history the Middle Class is a minority.

Jobs for waiters and orderlies may abound but ‘upward mobility’ jobs have been offshored by Jєωιѕн Wall Street to China.

No wonder our bridges are collapsing. A dwindling Middle Class means a measly tax base and a broken bridge to the future with plenty of potholes on the road ahead.

That’s why “bail-ins” are coming.

DC no longer has the bucks to bail out failing banks so confiscation of deposits fits the bill.

The legal framework is already in the works since depositors are tagged as “lenders” and last to be paid if a bank goes belly up.

And once they go belly up, Stanley Fischer—the real head of the Fed…and dual citizen of Israel, whose loyalties are questionable—has bail-ins in mind.

[Clip: “Work on the use of the resolution mechanisms set out in the Dodd-Frank Act, holds the promise of making it possible to resolve banks in difficulty at no direct cost to the taxpayer. As part of this approach, the United States is preparing a proposal to require systemically important banks to issue bail-inable long-term debt that will enable insolvent banks to recapitalize themselves.”]

All his financial gobbledygook means that banks will “recapitalize” by grabbing your check book. You, the depositor—I mean, “lender”—takes the hit.

The Second Amendment is also taking a hit.

Obama’s about to sidestep Congress and pass a raft of EOs…one of which will limit annual sales by firearm sellers.

And guess who’s drafting the EOs for Obama?

The usual suspects: Michael Bloomberg, head of the “Center for American Progress” and his ѕуηαgσgυє buddy, John Feinblatt, head of “Everytown for Gun Safety.”

It’s a Jєωιѕн agenda to strip the Goyim of their guns. But Trump ain’t buying it.

[Clip: “The Second Amendment guarantees a fundamental right that belongs to all law-abiding Americans. Right? I wrote this. The constitution doesn’t create that right, it ensures that the government can’t take it away, right? Can’t. They’re doing all sorts of moves to try and take it away.

“Our Founding Fathers knew and our Supreme Court has upheld that the Second Amendment purpose is to guarantee our right to defend ourselves and our families. We need that. In fact, I have a license to carry in New York. Can you believe that? Nobody knows that.

“Now this is in light of what’s gone on in Oregon. Every time something happens, they don’t blame mental illness, that our mental health care is out of whack, and all of the other problems. And by the way, it was a gun-free zone. I will tell you. If you had a couple of the teachers or somebody with guns in that room you would have been a hell of a lot better off.”]

And speaking of teachers, the ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ Movement—pushed by the Jєωιѕн ADL and SPLC—is launching a full scale attack on Christian schools.

Just last week, a Massachusetts court forced a Catholic Girl’s School, Fontbonne Academy, to hire the plaintive, a ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ teacher, who stated on his application that he was married to another man.

And you thought the Supreme Court ruling would satisfy the ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs and their Jєωιѕн enablers?

There’s no rest for the wicked. They’re all about destroying the Church through the back door by undermining Her teachings.

And Hillary’s all for it.

Her kickoff ad showed two men holding hands and two women cuddling up together.

She also holds male hero Vladimir Putin in contempt.

[Clip: “When Putin came back in and said he was going to be president, ah, that did change the relationship. We have to stand up to his bullying…”]

Shut her mouth.

The time for whipping up enemies is over. If we’re going to “rebuild” America then all the war rhetoric must stop.

Trump claims he can make that happen.

[Clip: “Oh and then they’re accusing me, ‘Putin called him brilliant. That’s not good.’ Well, isn’t it sorta nice if like countries who are always fighting with, maybe we’d get along, let them do - right? I mean, look, you know we’re all tough guys, but wouldn’t it be nice if like Russia and us could knock out an enemy together? And not us bear the full costs sometimes, like…you know, we’re always fighting.

“But I’ve had some guys say, ‘Aah, Russia.’

“How about one of our, the people up on the, ‘I wouldn’t talk to them, I wouldn’t discuss anything, I wouldn’t talk…’ I mean, what do they want to do, have a World War 3? Okay, World War 3? For what?”]

It’s time we stop the war rhetoric and our war economy.

We’re living in a War economy not the Peace economy we need for rebuilding our crumbling cities and broken bridges.

Time to beat our swords into plowshares and start building bridges with the rest of the world.

If that’s ahead for 2016 then we’ve still got a fighting chance.

  Trump may the GOP candidate so he needs lots of prayers so he can get
to do the job he says he can do. Otherwise we are in serious trouble if we
get another 4 years of bad. We need a miracle and we also need USA unity.

Did you see the debates this past Tuesday?  

I thought that Fox Business did a good job of keeping the questions relevant and not unfairly dumping loaded questions on particular candidates.

After it was over, there was a post-debate interview area where one of the moderators sat down with individual debate members.  They spoke to three or four of them (including Jeb Bush), while showing a backdrop of the goings-on in the debate room (which was a location some distance away from the interview studio).

So the interview studio had two people in it, the debate member and the moderator.  But they used something like a blue screen technique to show the live feed in the background as if they were having this interview in the balcony of the debate forum itself, even though that was a different room in reality.

While the moderator was talking to Bush, a young man on the debate live feed floor came walking over near the camera holding his sign that said "Jeb Bush" as if to identify the location in the room where Bush was.  But Bush was not in that room!

While I was watching all this surreal stuff, it became eye-catching to me to see all the microphone booms and cameras pointing in one direction, off to the right of where Bush was seated (in the backdrop behind Bush).  Effectively, Bush was facing to the left, toward the interviewer, and behind him was seen the background of journalists in the debate forum floor (live feed) all facing to the right, pointing cameras and holding microphones, but you could NOT see who it was they were looking at and trying to get pictures of and audio from.  They even used two camera angles in the interview studio, changing the backdrop with similarly coordinated two camera angles.  It was an obvious effort to make it look as though the interview was taking place in the debate forum.  But they had SAID at the beginning of the interview that they were located a few hundred yards away from where the debates had taken place.

While I watched for some clue as to who was the focus of media attention in the debate floor area (seen by live feed in the background), I got one glimpse of Donald Trump before they quickly changed to the other camera so Trump would not be visible.  They kept Trump behind the head and torso of Jeb Bush in the studio background, or else off camera to the right side.  Even so, all the while the moderator was talking to Bush, you could see that the media was very much focused on someone else entirely, but you couldn't see who it was.

Only at the very end of the Bush interview was it shown that the subject of interest in the debate forum was the candidate standing near the ID sign that was held up, which said "Trump."

.

If Trump keeps leading in the polls, I think that Obama may use one of his presidential orders to declare an emergency, cancel the 2016 general elections, and stay in office.

That's what I've expected ever since his re-election.  I don't think he has the popularity/support to attempt such a stunt now though.

Now that the perfidious Jєωs have induced about as much of Jєωry's agenda out of Obama these last 7 years, they might αssαssιnαtҽ Obama sometime before the election, while framing and scapegoating an "extremist, redneck, hillbilly, gun-supporting, Christian". The intent is to get Biden into the presidency and declare martial law on America in wake of the planned race war that will be effected, and issue a presidential order confiscating guns and banning future sales of guns and ammo, and suspend the elections indefinitely to keep Biden in power well beyond 2016/17.

Quote from: Maria Regina

If Trump keeps leading in the polls, I think that Obama may use one of his presidential orders to declare an emergency, cancel the 2016 general elections, and stay in office.

That's what I've expected ever since his re-election.  I don't think he has the popularity/support to attempt such a stunt now though.

It is a fact that the reason Obama won reelection in 2012 is because
eight million votes disappeared for the Republican candidate because
of voter fraud.
The way the law is now, the Republicans could not dispute the final
totals.   The Republicans agreed with the Democrats not to dispute
the totals because of the fear of being called racists.
Once picked up by the mass media and the radicals in our colleges
and universities and selective reporting. Even if there was a honest
recount and the Republican elected. All you will hear is 'racism"
24/7. This will inflamed the Blacks and lead to massive riots.
Our country is being held hostage by left wing and liberal racial
politics. And establishment conservatives are very quiet about this.