Author Topic: What To Expect In 2016  (Read 2718 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Croix de Fer

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3219
  • Reputation: +2520/-2197
  • Gender: Male
What To Expect In 2016
« on: January 06, 2016, 02:09:38 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

  • [youtube]https://www.youtube.com/embed/SpGMxXAIMdY[/youtube]

    Text:

    Quote
    It’s all downhill from here.

    I mean, 2016 doesn’t look too good.

    Trump may want to “rebuild America” but it’s going to be an uphill battle all the way.

    [Clip: “We have to rebuild our country. It’s so important, it’s so vital. We have to rebuild our hospitals and our, everything. Our roads, our airports, our country’s a mess, our bridges…did you see the Report, 61% of them are in trouble. What does that mean? You’re driving across and it collapses, and that’s been happening.”]

    But you can’t fix bridges without a tax base. For the first time in US history the Middle Class is a minority.

    Jobs for waiters and orderlies may abound but ‘upward mobility’ jobs have been offshored by Jewish Wall Street to China.

    No wonder our bridges are collapsing. A dwindling Middle Class means a measly tax base and a broken bridge to the future with plenty of potholes on the road ahead.

    That’s why “bail-ins” are coming.

    DC no longer has the bucks to bail out failing banks so confiscation of deposits fits the bill.

    The legal framework is already in the works since depositors are tagged as “lenders” and last to be paid if a bank goes belly up.

    And once they go belly up, Stanley Fischer—the real head of the Fed…and dual citizen of Israel, whose loyalties are questionable—has bail-ins in mind.

    [Clip: “Work on the use of the resolution mechanisms set out in the Dodd-Frank Act, holds the promise of making it possible to resolve banks in difficulty at no direct cost to the taxpayer. As part of this approach, the United States is preparing a proposal to require systemically important banks to issue bail-inable long-term debt that will enable insolvent banks to recapitalize themselves.”]

    All his financial gobbledygook means that banks will “recapitalize” by grabbing your check book. You, the depositor—I mean, “lender”—takes the hit.

    The Second Amendment is also taking a hit.

    Obama’s about to sidestep Congress and pass a raft of EOs…one of which will limit annual sales by firearm sellers.

    And guess who’s drafting the EOs for Obama?

    The usual suspects: Michael Bloomberg, head of the “Center for American Progress” and his synagogue buddy, John Feinblatt, head of “Everytown for Gun Safety.”

    It’s a Jewish agenda to strip the Goyim of their guns. But Trump ain’t buying it.

    [Clip: “The Second Amendment guarantees a fundamental right that belongs to all law-abiding Americans. Right? I wrote this. The constitution doesn’t create that right, it ensures that the government can’t take it away, right? Can’t. They’re doing all sorts of moves to try and take it away.

    “Our Founding Fathers knew and our Supreme Court has upheld that the Second Amendment purpose is to guarantee our right to defend ourselves and our families. We need that. In fact, I have a license to carry in New York. Can you believe that? Nobody knows that.

    “Now this is in light of what’s gone on in Oregon. Every time something happens, they don’t blame mental illness, that our mental health care is out of whack, and all of the other problems. And by the way, it was a gun-free zone. I will tell you. If you had a couple of the teachers or somebody with guns in that room you would have been a hell of a lot better off.”]

    And speaking of teachers, the Homosexual Movement—pushed by the Jewish ADL and SPLC—is launching a full scale attack on Christian schools.

    Just last week, a Massachusetts court forced a Catholic Girl’s School, Fontbonne Academy, to hire the plaintive, a homosexual teacher, who stated on his application that he was married to another man.

    And you thought the Supreme Court ruling would satisfy the homosexuals and their Jewish enablers?

    There’s no rest for the wicked. They’re all about destroying the Church through the back door by undermining Her teachings.

    And Hillary’s all for it.

    Her kickoff ad showed two men holding hands and two women cuddling up together.

    She also holds male hero Vladimir Putin in contempt.

    [Clip: “When Putin came back in and said he was going to be president, ah, that did change the relationship. We have to stand up to his bullying…”]

    Shut her mouth.

    The time for whipping up enemies is over. If we’re going to “rebuild” America then all the war rhetoric must stop.

    Trump claims he can make that happen.

    [Clip: “Oh and then they’re accusing me, ‘Putin called him brilliant. That’s not good.’ Well, isn’t it sorta nice if like countries who are always fighting with, maybe we’d get along, let them do - right? I mean, look, you know we’re all tough guys, but wouldn’t it be nice if like Russia and us could knock out an enemy together? And not us bear the full costs sometimes, like…you know, we’re always fighting.

    “But I’ve had some guys say, ‘Aah, Russia.’

    “How about one of our, the people up on the, ‘I wouldn’t talk to them, I wouldn’t discuss anything, I wouldn’t talk…’ I mean, what do they want to do, have a World War 3? Okay, World War 3? For what?”]

    It’s time we stop the war rhetoric and our war economy.

    We’re living in a War economy not the Peace economy we need for rebuilding our crumbling cities and broken bridges.

    Time to beat our swords into plowshares and start building bridges with the rest of the world.

    If that’s ahead for 2016 then we’ve still got a fighting chance.
    Blessed be the Lord my God, who teacheth my hands to fight, and my fingers to war. ~ Psalms 143:1 (Douay-Rheims)

    Offline OHCA

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2837
    • Reputation: +1863/-109
    • Gender: Male
    What To Expect In 2016
    « Reply #1 on: January 06, 2016, 08:26:46 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I am leaning toward voting for Trump instead of a 3rd party if he is the nominee.


    Offline HiddenServant

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2839
    • Reputation: +75/-2
    • Gender: Male
      • h
    What To Expect In 2016
    « Reply #2 on: January 06, 2016, 08:39:17 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  •   Trump may the GOP candidate so he needs lots of prayers so he can get
    to do the job he says he can do. Otherwise we are in serious trouble if we
    get another 4 years of bad. We need a miracle and we also need USA unity.

    Offline Maria Regina

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3683
    • Reputation: +982/-547
    • Gender: Female
    What To Expect In 2016
    « Reply #3 on: January 16, 2016, 11:37:17 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • If Trump keeps leading in the polls, I think that Obama may use one of his presidential orders to declare an emergency, cancel the 2016 general elections, and stay in office.

    Lord have mercy.

    Offline Neil Obstat

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 18173
    • Reputation: +8259/-638
    • Gender: Male
    What To Expect In 2016
    « Reply #4 on: January 17, 2016, 03:40:39 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Did you see the debates this past Tuesday?  

    I thought that Fox Business did a good job of keeping the questions relevant and not unfairly dumping loaded questions on particular candidates.

    After it was over, there was a post-debate interview area where one of the moderators sat down with individual debate members.  They spoke to three or four of them (including Jeb Bush), while showing a backdrop of the goings-on in the debate room (which was a location some distance away from the interview studio).

    So the interview studio had two people in it, the debate member and the moderator.  But they used something like a blue screen technique to show the live feed in the background as if they were having this interview in the balcony of the debate forum itself, even though that was a different room in reality.

    While the moderator was talking to Bush, a young man on the debate live feed floor came walking over near the camera holding his sign that said "Jeb Bush" as if to identify the location in the room where Bush was.  But Bush was not in that room!

    While I was watching all this surreal stuff, it became eye-catching to me to see all the microphone booms and cameras pointing in one direction, off to the right of where Bush was seated (in the backdrop behind Bush).  Effectively, Bush was facing to the left, toward the interviewer, and behind him was seen the background of journalists in the debate forum floor (live feed) all facing to the right, pointing cameras and holding microphones, but you could NOT see who it was they were looking at and trying to get pictures of and audio from.  They even used two camera angles in the interview studio, changing the backdrop with similarly coordinated two camera angles.  It was an obvious effort to make it look as though the interview was taking place in the debate forum.  But they had SAID at the beginning of the interview that they were located a few hundred yards away from where the debates had taken place.

    While I watched for some clue as to who was the focus of media attention in the debate floor area (seen by live feed in the background), I got one glimpse of Donald Trump before they quickly changed to the other camera so Trump would not be visible.  They kept Trump behind the head and torso of Jeb Bush in the studio background, or else off camera to the right side.  Even so, all the while the moderator was talking to Bush, you could see that the media was very much focused on someone else entirely, but you couldn't see who it was.

    Only at the very end of the Bush interview was it shown that the subject of interest in the debate forum was the candidate standing near the ID sign that was held up, which said "Trump."

    .

    .--. .-.-.- ... .-.-.- ..-. --- .-. - .... . -.- .. -. --. -.. --- -- --..-- - .... . .--. --- .-- . .-. .- -. -.. -....- -....- .--- ..- ... - -.- .. -.. -.. .. -. --. .-.-.


    Offline ranlare

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 255
    • Reputation: +38/-105
    • Gender: Male
    What To Expect In 2016
    « Reply #5 on: January 17, 2016, 01:03:55 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • At this point due to fact that the American populace is more Liberal than ever, I think  Hillary "Heart of Cement" Clinton may likely win, although I hope not. The emails that are being disclosed from her illegal private server, may be the only thing that can stop her.  

    I recall seeing a bumper sticker years ago, when her husband lived in the White House and was in trouble, which read, "Impeach President Clinton And Her Husband."
    "More souls go to Hell because of sins of the flesh than for any other reason." -Our Lady of Fatima, to Jacinta Marto

    Offline OHCA

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2837
    • Reputation: +1863/-109
    • Gender: Male
    What To Expect In 2016
    « Reply #6 on: January 17, 2016, 11:16:14 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Maria Regina
    If Trump keeps leading in the polls, I think that Obama may use one of his presidential orders to declare an emergency, cancel the 2016 general elections, and stay in office.



    That's what I've expected ever since his re-election.  I don't think he has the popularity/support to attempt such a stunt now though.

    Offline Maria Regina

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3683
    • Reputation: +982/-547
    • Gender: Female
    What To Expect In 2016
    « Reply #7 on: January 17, 2016, 11:44:17 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: OHCA
    Quote from: Maria Regina
    If Trump keeps leading in the polls, I think that Obama may use one of his presidential orders to declare an emergency, cancel the 2016 general elections, and stay in office.



    That's what I've expected ever since his re-election.  I don't think he has the popularity/support to attempt such a stunt now though.


    With Obama's removal of most military men who would oppose him, and with his willingness to issue  presidential executive orders on a whim, I honestly think that he will do it. He knows that the Congress and the Senate are all a bunch of wimps.
    Lord have mercy.


    Offline Croix de Fer

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3219
    • Reputation: +2520/-2197
    • Gender: Male
    What To Expect In 2016
    « Reply #8 on: January 25, 2016, 08:03:06 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Now that the perfidious Jews have induced about as much of Jewry's agenda out of Obama these last 7 years, they might assassinate Obama sometime before the election, while framing and scapegoating an "extremist, redneck, hillbilly, gun-supporting, Christian". The intent is to get Biden into the presidency and declare martial law on America in wake of the planned race war that will be effected, and issue a presidential order confiscating guns and banning future sales of guns and ammo, and suspend the elections indefinitely to keep Biden in power well beyond 2016/17.
    Blessed be the Lord my God, who teacheth my hands to fight, and my fingers to war. ~ Psalms 143:1 (Douay-Rheims)

    Offline JezusDeKoning

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2940
    • Reputation: +1084/-2217
    • Gender: Male
    What To Expect In 2016
    « Reply #9 on: January 25, 2016, 11:01:10 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Maria Regina
    If Trump keeps leading in the polls, I think that Obama may use one of his presidential orders to declare an emergency, cancel the 2016 general elections, and stay in office.



    OK, he can't. That would require convening the states, proposing the repeal of the 22nd Amendment (which specifically blocks what you're implying) and getting a 2/3rds majority... In 5 months.

    No one wants that when you consider they wrote the amendment in the first place to prevent that. It was written just after FDR died to avoid having another FDR, who nearly served four terms. He got to 3 and then died in the middle of the 4th.

    And what Obama's doing re: executive orders is not that much. Other presidents have had WAY more. Some in the THOUSANDS. I don't like the man's views very much but there's been worse presidents.
    Remember O most gracious Virgin Mary...

    Offline RomanCatholic1953

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 7877
    • Reputation: +2608/-111
    • Gender: Male
    • I will not respond to any posts from Poche.
    What To Expect In 2016
    « Reply #10 on: January 27, 2016, 10:28:37 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: OHCA
    Quote from: Maria Regina
    If Trump keeps leading in the polls, I think that Obama may use one of his presidential orders to declare an emergency, cancel the 2016 general elections, and stay in office.



    That's what I've expected ever since his re-election.  I don't think he has the popularity/support to attempt such a stunt now though.


    It is a fact that the reason Obama won reelection in 2012 is because
    eight million votes disappeared for the Republican candidate because
    of voter fraud.
    The way the law is now, the Republicans could not dispute the final
    totals.   The Republicans agreed with the Democrats not to dispute
    the totals because of the fear of being called racists.
    Once picked up by the mass media and the radicals in our colleges
    and universities and selective reporting. Even if there was a honest
    recount and the Republican elected. All you will hear is 'racism"
    24/7. This will inflamed the Blacks and lead to massive riots.
    Our country is being held hostage by left wing and liberal racial
    politics. And establishment conservatives are very quiet about this.


    Offline RomanCatholic1953

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 7877
    • Reputation: +2608/-111
    • Gender: Male
    • I will not respond to any posts from Poche.
    What To Expect In 2016
    « Reply #11 on: January 28, 2016, 09:51:54 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: RomanCatholic1953
    Quote from: OHCA
    Quote from: Maria Regina
    If Trump keeps leading in the polls, I think that Obama may use one of his presidential orders to declare an emergency, cancel the 2016 general elections, and stay in office.



    That's what I've expected ever since his re-election.  I don't think he has the popularity/support to attempt such a stunt now though.


    It is a fact that the reason Obama won reelection in 2012 is because
    eight million votes disappeared for the Republican candidate because
    of voter fraud.
    The way the law is now, the Republicans could not dispute the final
    totals.   The Republicans agreed with the Democrats not to dispute
    the totals because of the fear of being called racists.
    Once picked up by the mass media and the radicals in our colleges
    and universities and selective reporting. Even if there was a honest
    recount and the Republican elected. All you will hear is 'racism"
    24/7. This will inflamed the Blacks and lead to massive riots.
    Our country is being held hostage by left wing and liberal racial
    politics. And establishment conservatives are very quiet about this.


    Here is an article from 2012 that shows that there was possible
    voter fraud to reelect Obama.

    http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/election-fraud-obama-won-more-than-99-percent-of-the-vote-in-more-than-100-ohio-precincts


     

    Sitemap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16