Author Topic: Voting for Trump? (Read 23977 times)

MyrnaM · « **Reply #45 on:** October 23, 2016, 09:30:07 AM »

It is my hope that if Trump wins God's Will as happens so often, has taken acts of evil and turns it into good. Hillary, on the other-hand is too far gone, in my opinion, and voting for her is tantamount to taking the Mark of the Beast.

Therefore, indirectly not voting for Trump is a vote for Hillary.

Consider what happened to Saint Thomas Becket who was Archbishop of Canterbury he had evil intentions, however, with God's grace intervening he became a Saint and a perfect example of God changing bad into good. Another good reason to vote for Trump and I read this is why even the "elite" of the Republican party hate him is because he is not a member of the evil Masonic secret society. Make the "elite" the DELETE, vote Trump and PRAY.

No! I am certainly not comparing Trump to Saint Thomas Becket just pointing out how God works in the life of those He chooses and with those who like us just want the best.

How does that quote go: Bad happens because the good do nothing.

JezusDeKoning · « **Reply #46 on:** October 23, 2016, 10:20:22 AM »

Quote from: RomanCatholic1953

Good News

Professor with Remarkable track record predicts a Trump Win:

Fox News Insider

https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/05e8d8d9-478f-35a2-bc81-4c3563853a30/ss_professor-with-remarkable.html

Saturday on Fox & Friends, Tucker Carlson sat down with a college professor with a remarkable record of predicting election outcomes.

Professor Helmut Norpoth, from Stony Brook University in New York State, has correctly predicted the outcomes of the last five presidential elections.

This year, he steadfastly believes Donald Trump will win the election.

Norpoth said he uses two "models" to make his prediction:

One is the "primary" model, where he compares a candidate's strength in their respective primaries.

"The candidate who does better in his party's primary beats the other guy who does less well," Norpoth said.

Looking at New Hampshire and South Carolina's primaries, Norpoth projected that Trump would be the general election favorite because of the strength of his showing, versus Hillary Clinton.

The second model he created is called the "swing of the pendulum" model.

Which actually makes a lot of sense. Parties shift every 8 years. That's the 22nd Amendment for you. Without it, there is no Obama.

hollingsworth · « **Reply #47 on:** October 23, 2016, 10:20:47 AM »

Quote

Why not vote for a third party candidate?

Why not just concede the election to Hillary?

OHCA · « **Reply #48 on:** October 23, 2016, 11:06:25 AM »

Quote from: hollingsworth

Quote
Why not vote for a third party candidate?

Why not just concede the election to Hillary?

Poche is a liberal. He would like that.

noOneImportant · « **Reply #49 on:** October 23, 2016, 01:34:40 PM »

I present the following video without comment:

Matthew · « **Reply #50 on:** October 23, 2016, 02:46:26 PM »

Quote from: noOneImportant

I present the following video without comment:

Yes, it sure does look like the election is rigged, doesn't it.

But no one would listen to me when I was criticizing Trump back during the primaries. In fact, virtually the whole (active, posting) membership was against me on that. Many were fervently PRO-Trump, not just anti-Hillary or some such. They had serious high hopes for what good things Trump would do for the world, from a Catholic perspective. They had him ranked somewhere between The Great Monarch and Vladimir Putin.

Cera · « **Reply #51 on:** October 23, 2016, 06:03:11 PM »

The only way to make an effort to stop Hillary's fast track to pro- 9-month-abortion and sodomy hell is to vote for Trump. Everything else is yada yada yada.

St Ignatius · « **Reply #52 on:** October 23, 2016, 08:29:35 PM »

Quote from: Matthew

Quote from: noOneImportant
I present the following video without comment:

Yes, it sure does look like the election is rigged, doesn't it.

But no one would listen to me when I was criticizing Trump back during the primaries. In fact, virtually the whole (active, posting) membership was against me on that. Many were fervently PRO-Trump, not just anti-Hillary or some such. They had serious high hopes for what good things Trump would do for the world, from a Catholic perspective. They had him ranked somewhere between The Great Monarch and Vladimir Putin.

So what's your point? Who here has ever denied that he WAS a stinken, prochoice Democrat? People change, for better or for worse, but now he wears a bullet - proof vest 24/7. He has shaken the foundations of our current tyranny. I don't think, from what I can remember, that anyone here thought he was saintly.

OHCA · « **Reply #53 on:** October 23, 2016, 08:40:57 PM »

Quote from: Matthew

Quote from: noOneImportant
I present the following video without comment:

But no one would listen to me when I was criticizing Trump back during the primaries.

The rest of the field was composed of a couple of lightweights and a bunch of NWO hacks.

St Ignatius · « **Reply #54 on:** October 23, 2016, 08:44:23 PM »

Quote from: OHCA

Quote from: Matthew
Quote from: noOneImportant
I present the following video without comment:

But no one would listen to me when I was criticizing Trump back during the primaries.

The rest of the field was composed of a couple of lightweights and a bunch of NWO hacks.

Exactly!

poche · « **Reply #55 on:** October 23, 2016, 11:19:51 PM »

Quote from: Truecharity

Quote from: poche
Quote from: hollingsworth
JDK:
Quote
Ignore the presidential election and go downballot. Both of them are wretched candidates.

You really mean to say that Trump and Clinton share wretchedness eqully? I can't believe I'm hearing this.

Trump is no more wretched, (and I assume you mean, basically, from a moral standpoint) than a number of our presidents have been.

FDR had at least one affair. His favorite mistress was right at his side in Warm Springs, GA the day he died in April of 1945. Kennedy was a notorious womanizer. Nobody disputes that. So was Lyndon Johnson. Woodrow Wilson was blackmailed during is first term by the Jew, Samuel Untemeyer, over the wife of a fellow professor at Princetion U. with whom, allegedly, he had had an intimate affair.

I'm sure other presidents of our nation were guilty of sowing their wild oats, as well.

But before you and other trads become too righteous in your indignation, just remember this: Hillary promises to appoint pro-choice justices, one promise alone which should put miles between her and Trump in the minds of all true Catholics. She wants entirely open borders and unrestricted foreign immigration. That's just for starters.

Trump has clearly outlined his program, item by item, for the restoration of this country, the elimination of government corruption, and the preservation of its Constitution. https://www.c-span.org/video/?417328-1/donald-trump-unveils-100day-action-plan-gettysburg-address

Clinton makes very few specific recommendations for correcting our country's wrongs and putting it back on the path towards prosperity and national restoration of moral integrity. She is in the pocket of the lobbyists, the big banks and foreign donors.

Why not vote for a third party candidate?

Guarantees victory for the devil.

Not if enough people agree with me.

poche · « **Reply #56 on:** October 23, 2016, 11:21:03 PM »

Quote from: OHCA

Quote from: poche
Quote from: hollingsworth
JDK:
Quote
Ignore the presidential election and go downballot. Both of them are wretched candidates.

You really mean to say that Trump and Clinton share wretchedness eqully? I can't believe I'm hearing this.

Trump is no more wretched, (and I assume you mean, basically, from a moral standpoint) than a number of our presidents have been.

FDR had at least one affair. His favorite mistress was right at his side in Warm Springs, GA the day he died in April of 1945. Kennedy was a notorious womanizer. Nobody disputes that. So was Lyndon Johnson. Woodrow Wilson was blackmailed during is first term by the Jew, Samuel Untemeyer, over the wife of a fellow professor at Princetion U. with whom, allegedly, he had had an intimate affair.

I'm sure other presidents of our nation were guilty of sowing their wild oats, as well.

But before you and other trads become too righteous in your indignation, just remember this: Hillary promises to appoint pro-choice justices, one promise alone which should put miles between her and Trump in the minds of all true Catholics. She wants entirely open borders and unrestricted foreign immigration. That's just for starters.

Trump has clearly outlined his program, item by item, for the restoration of this country, the elimination of government corruption, and the preservation of its Constitution. https://www.c-span.org/video/?417328-1/donald-trump-unveils-100day-action-plan-gettysburg-address

Clinton makes very few specific recommendations for correcting our country's wrongs and putting it back on the path towards prosperity and national restoration of moral integrity. She is in the pocket of the lobbyists, the big banks and foreign donors.

Why not vote for a third party candidate?

So, Poche, you have clearly stated that you cannot vote for Trump. Can (will) you vote for Hillary?

No.

poche · « **Reply #57 on:** October 23, 2016, 11:36:33 PM »

Quote from: OHCA

Quote from: poche
Quote from: hollingsworth
JDK:
Quote
Ignore the presidential election and go downballot. Both of them are wretched candidates.

You really mean to say that Trump and Clinton share wretchedness eqully? I can't believe I'm hearing this.

Trump is no more wretched, (and I assume you mean, basically, from a moral standpoint) than a number of our presidents have been.

FDR had at least one affair. His favorite mistress was right at his side in Warm Springs, GA the day he died in April of 1945. Kennedy was a notorious womanizer. Nobody disputes that. So was Lyndon Johnson. Woodrow Wilson was blackmailed during is first term by the Jew, Samuel Untemeyer, over the wife of a fellow professor at Princetion U. with whom, allegedly, he had had an intimate affair.

I'm sure other presidents of our nation were guilty of sowing their wild oats, as well.

But before you and other trads become too righteous in your indignation, just remember this: Hillary promises to appoint pro-choice justices, one promise alone which should put miles between her and Trump in the minds of all true Catholics. She wants entirely open borders and unrestricted foreign immigration. That's just for starters.

Trump has clearly outlined his program, item by item, for the restoration of this country, the elimination of government corruption, and the preservation of its Constitution. https://www.c-span.org/video/?417328-1/donald-trump-unveils-100day-action-plan-gettysburg-address

Clinton makes very few specific recommendations for correcting our country's wrongs and putting it back on the path towards prosperity and national restoration of moral integrity. She is in the pocket of the lobbyists, the big banks and foreign donors.

Why not vote for a third party candidate?

So, Poche, you have clearly stated that you cannot vote for Trump. Can (will) you vote for Hillary?

no

Ladislaus · « **Reply #58 on:** October 24, 2016, 08:45:35 AM »

Quote from: St Ignatius

Quote from: Matthew
Quote from: noOneImportant
I present the following video without comment:

Yes, it sure does look like the election is rigged, doesn't it.

But no one would listen to me when I was criticizing Trump back during the primaries. In fact, virtually the whole (active, posting) membership was against me on that. Many were fervently PRO-Trump, not just anti-Hillary or some such. They had serious high hopes for what good things Trump would do for the world, from a Catholic perspective. They had him ranked somewhere between The Great Monarch and Vladimir Putin.

So what's your point? Who here has ever denied that he WAS a stinken, prochoice Democrat? People change, for better or for worse, but now he wears a bullet - proof vest 24/7. He has shaken the foundations of our current tyranny. I don't think, from what I can remember, that anyone here thought he was saintly.

Exactly. Everyone here realizes this; it's not some kind of earth-shaking revelation. In fact, his being a derelict in his personal life and morals along with his past positions were largely the premise of this entire thread. Given that he's personally a reprobate and has a history of having taken liberal positions, can and/or should a Catholic still vote for him?

Ladislaus · « **Reply #59 on:** October 24, 2016, 08:55:08 AM »

Quote from: MyrnaM

Therefore, indirectly not voting for Trump is a vote for Hillary.

No, we need to reject this logic as Catholics. It's what THEY have tried to indoctrinate us with. We vote out of principle. If we can't vote for Trump on principle, that is NOT a "vote for Hillary". They created this binary two-party system precisely so they can rig the vote using this kind of false dialectic.