Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Voting for Trump?  (Read 24044 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Alexandria

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2677
  • Reputation: +485/-122
  • Gender: Female
Voting for Trump?
« Reply #135 on: October 28, 2016, 04:41:02 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: hollingsworth
    Alexandria:
    Quote
    Lad's smarter than to get involved with any of that nonsense.
     

    I see.  So, Alexandria, you know who Ladislaus is?  He's an acquaintance of yours?  So, perhaps, he feels that he can not dignify my inquiry with a reply?  Is that it?

    I will agree that anything having to do with Fr. Pfeiffer is "nonsense."  But the guy reminds me of this Post Falls fellow.  I admitted openly that I could be wrong, and, apparently, I am, since you seem to know for certain that this Ladislaus is not the person I'm thinking he may be.


    Well, you know, Hollingsworth, that CathInfo was around before you became a member?  :ready-to-eat:  And some of us were members of CathInfo before you became a member?   :applause:  Not that it is any of your business, but that's where Lad and I met - here - CathInfo.      :smile::fryingpan:

    Unless he's moved, he does not live in Post Falls.   Who in their right mind would??   :wink:

    Offline hollingsworth

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2834
    • Reputation: +2933/-523
    • Gender: Male
    Voting for Trump?
    « Reply #136 on: October 28, 2016, 05:15:33 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • Alexandria:
    Quote
    Not that it is any of your business, but that's where Lad and I met - here - CathInfo.      :smile::fryingpan:

    Unless he's moved, he does not live in Post Falls.  


    I see.  So, you met him "here," you say?  "(H)ere," as in on the CI forum?  That's where you met?  Your wording is a bit elliptical.  I assume you never met him face to face.

    Why he doesn't answer for himself is a puzzle to me.  Everybody, who's been "here" for awhile, knows who I am.  But Laddy? I don't know.  He's kind a squirmy.


    Offline RomanCatholic1953

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 10512
    • Reputation: +3267/-207
    • Gender: Male
    • I will not respond to any posts from Poche.
    Voting for Trump?
    « Reply #137 on: October 28, 2016, 05:44:54 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The Failure of Democracy,

    How the Oligarchs plan to steal the Election.

    Paul Craig Roberts

    Posted 10-28-2016

    http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article45756.htm

    October 28, 2016 "Information Clearing House" - I am now convinced that the Oligarchy that rules America intends to steal the presidential election. In the past, the oligarchs have not cared which candidate won as the oligarchs owned both. But they do not own Trump.

    Most likely you are unaware of what Trump is telling people as the media does not report it. A person who speaks like this: (Video only seen on Link above).

    is not endeared to the oligarchs.

     Who are the oligarchs?

    —Wall Street and the mega-banks too big to fail and their agent the Federal Reserve, a federal agency that put 5 banks ahead of millions of troubled American homeowners who the federal reserve allowed to be flushed down the toilet. In order to save the mega-banks’ balance sheets from their irresponsible behavior, the Fed has denied retirees any interest income on their savings for eight years, forcing the elderly to draw down their savings, leaving their heirs, who have been displaced from employment by corporate jobs offshoring, penniless.

    —The military/security complex which has spent trillions of our taxpayer dollars on 15 years of gratuitous wars based entirely on lies in order to enrich themselves and their power.

    —The neoconservartives whose crazed ideology of US world hegemony thrusts the American people into military conflict with Russia and China.

    —The US global corporations that sent American jobs to China and India and elsewhere in order to enrich the One Percent with higher profits from lower labor costs.

    —Agribusiness (Monsanto et.al.), corporations that poison the soil, the water, the oceans, and our food with their GMOs, herbicides, pesticides, and chemical fertilizers, while killing the bees that pollinate the crops.

    —The extraction industries—energy, mining, fracking, and timber—that maximize their profits by destroying the environment and the water supply.

    —The Israel Lobby that controls US Middle East policy and is committing genocide against the Palestinians just as the US committed genocide against native Americans. Israel is using the US to eliminate sovereign countries that stand in Israel's way.

    What convinces me that the Oligarchy intends to steal the election is the vast difference between the presstitutes’ reporting and the facts on the ground.

    According to the presstitutes, Hillary is so far ahead that there is no point in Trump supporters bothering to vote. Hillary has won the election before the vote. Hillary has been declared a 93% sure winner.

    I am yet to see one Hillary yard sign, but Trump signs are everywhere. Reports I receive are that Hillary’s public appearances are unattended but Trumps are so heavily attended that people have to be turned away. This is a report from a woman in Florida:

    “Trump has pulled huge numbers all over FL while campaigning here this week. I only see Trump signs and stickers in my wide travels. I dined at a Mexican restaurant last night. Two women my age sitting behind me were talking about how they had tried to see Trump when he came to Tallahassee. They left work early, arriving at the venue at 4:00 for a 6:00 rally. The place was already over capacity so they were turned away. It turned out that there were so many people there by 2:00 that the doors had to be opened to them. The women said that the crowds present were a mix of races and ages.”

    I know the person who gave me this report and have no doubt whatsoever as to its veracity.

    I also receive from readers similar reports from around the country.

    This is how the theft of the election is supposed to work: The media concentrated in a few corporate hands has gone all out to convince not only Americans but also the world, that Donald Trump is such an unacceptable candidate that he has lost the election before the vote.

    By controlling the explanation, when the election is stolen those who challenge the stolen election are without a foundation in the media. All media reports will say that it was a run away victory for Hillary over the misogynist immigrant-hating Trump.

    And liberal, progressive opinion will be relieved and off guard as Hillary takes us into nuclear war.

    That the Oligarchy intends to steal the election from the American people is verified by the officially reported behavior of the voting machines in early voting in Texas. The NPR presstitutes have declared that Hillary is such a favorite that even Republican Texas is up for grabs in the election.

    If this is the case, why was it necessary for the voting machines to be programmed to change Trump votes to Hillary votes? Those voters who noted that they voted Trump but were recorded Hillary complained. The election officials, claiming a glitch (which only went one way), changed to paper ballots. But who will count them? No “glitches” caused Hillary votes to go to Trump, only Trump votes to go to Hillary.

    The most brilliant movie of our time was The Matrix. This movie captured the life of Americans manipulated by a false reality, only in the real America there is insufficient awareness and no Neo, except possibly Donald Trump, to challenge the system. Americans of all stripes—academics, scholars, journalists, Republicans, Democrats, right-wing, left-wing, US Representatives, US Senators, Presidents, corporate moguls and brainwashed Americans and foreigners—live in a false reality.

    In the United States today a critical presidential election is in process in which not a single important issue is addressed by Hillary and the presstitutes. This is total failure. Democracy, once the hope of the world, has totally failed in the United States of America. Trump is correct. The American people must restore the accountability of government to the people.

     
    Dr. Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy and associate editor of the Wall Street Journal. He was columnist for Business Week, Scripps Howard News Service, and Creators Syndicate. He has had many university appointments. His internet columns have attracted a worldwide following. Roberts' latest books are The Failure of Laissez Faire Capitalism and Economic Dissolution of the West, How America Was Lost, and The Neoconservative Threat to World Order.
     

     



    Offline St Ignatius

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1024
    • Reputation: +795/-158
    • Gender: Male
    Voting for Trump?
    « Reply #138 on: October 28, 2016, 07:41:39 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Now let's add this to the mix... could this most recent development of today be the "October Surprise" of the century? Things are definitely getting interesting, IMO.

    http://www.infowars.com/breaking-fbi-reopens-investigation-into-clinton-emails/

    Offline Clemens Maria

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2246
    • Reputation: +1485/-605
    • Gender: Male
    Voting for Trump?
    « Reply #139 on: October 28, 2016, 11:35:56 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The fact that all the globalists and war-mongers and progressives hate Trump so passionately that they do stupid things like ruin their own credibility (e.g. the BigMedia) is definitely a good sign.  And although Trump has the support of people like Newt Gingrich, Rudy Guliani, and Sean Hannity, none of those people are running for office.  That's another good sign (i.e. only people who have nothing to lose support Trump).  There is maybe one thing that would be objectionable to traditionalists and that is the fact that Trump's position with respect to sɛҳuąƖ perversion is very ambiguous at best.  At worst, he is supportive of perversion.  He has a mix of social conservatives and libertarian (social progressives) in his campaign so it's not really clear what will happen on that front.  If Trump wins, I expect him to move a little bit to the center in order to broaden his base for the next election cycle.  I know he didn't really do that this election cycle but the Democrats won't be stupid enough to nominate the worst possible candidate 2 elections in a row (although they are pretty stupid).  If they had nominated Bernie (which they could easily have done), he probably would have done better against Trump than Hillary.  But if she wins, I guess it won't matter.  I think the two casualties of this election cycle are the neocons and the corporate BigMedia.  Breitbart and Infowars are now more popular than CNN.  I think Trump is going to win.  The polls are flawed.  They are oversampling Democrats and they are probably oversampling Republicans and Independents in big cities where they tend to be more progressive.  They are predicting NH will go to Hillary but I see way more Trump signs up there than Hillary signs.  And there would probably be a lot more Trump signs if they weren't constantly getting vandalized.  The only hope for the Democrats is for them to steal the election.  But is it worth risking going to prison for 10 years to get Hillary in?  The FBI case is reopened and Wikileaks still has 15000+ emails to release (the best for last).  I have a hard time believing independents are going to break her way.  Hard to believe that Doug Band's sensational admission that the Clinton Foundation was a pay-for-play scheme is not front page news everywhere in the world.  Putin's questioning whether or not America is a Banana Republic may not be rhetorical after all.  Our government may be no better than the governments of Libya and Iraq which we overthrew in the name of democracy.


    Offline Charlemagne

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1439
    • Reputation: +2103/-18
    • Gender: Male
    Voting for Trump?
    « Reply #140 on: October 29, 2016, 12:08:11 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: St Ignatius
    Now let's add this to the mix... could this most recent development of today be the "October Surprise" of the century? Things are definitely getting interesting, IMO.

    http://www.infowars.com/breaking-fbi-reopens-investigation-into-clinton-emails/


    I suspect the FBI now has all 33,000 e-mails (if it didn't have them all along). Agents might have found them on the seized devices of either Weiner or Abedin.
    "This principle is most certain: The non-Christian cannot in any way be Pope. The reason for this is that he cannot be head of what he is not a member. Now, he who is not a Christian is not a member of the Church, and a manifest heretic is not a Christian, as is clearly taught by St. Cyprian, St. Athanasius, St. Augustine, St. Jerome, and others. Therefore, the manifest heretic cannot be Pope." -- St. Robert Bellarmine

    Offline John Grace

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5521
    • Reputation: +121/-6
    • Gender: Male
    Voting for Trump?
    « Reply #141 on: October 29, 2016, 05:35:52 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Electing Donald Trump and building the wall will help the pro-life cause. Britain leaving the EU will assist also. Here in Ireland we support a referendum to leave the EU. Because of Britain leaving the EU, Ireland will continue to be a target for mass immigration. Immigration will mean more abortion.

    The wall between USA and Mexico will stop Mexican women travelling to USA for abortions. Here in Ireland the number of women travelling to England for abortions has decreased. It's mainly immigrant women travelling to England for abortion. Their respective embassies and consulates must address this.

    Abortion is always a mortal sin and all abortions must be opposed. Yes, spiritual means are necessary to fight the social evils but electing Trump in the political realm will make America great again.

    In one borough in London England there is a 50 year wait for a council house. People who never voted before backed Nigel Farage and voted to leave the EU.

    Thankfully, we see a move away in the United States of the Irish Catholic voting for the Democrats.

    Offline St John Evangelist

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 91
    • Reputation: +39/-4
    • Gender: Male
    Voting for Trump?
    « Reply #142 on: October 29, 2016, 06:13:45 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I would vote for Trump is I were a US citizen. I would have no qualms of conscience whatsoever in doing so.


    Offline John Grace

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5521
    • Reputation: +121/-6
    • Gender: Male
    Voting for Trump?
    « Reply #143 on: October 29, 2016, 06:22:32 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The good church going black people are fed up of the Democrats and the rapists, muggers and drug gangs giving blacks a bad name. Same in Britain with church going blacks backing the vote to leave EU.  Same applies to the Mexicans. Not every Mexican is a cholo.

    Offline St John Evangelist

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 91
    • Reputation: +39/-4
    • Gender: Male
    Voting for Trump?
    « Reply #144 on: October 29, 2016, 06:25:15 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Ladislaus
    When you vote for a candidate, you are responsible for whatever policies they enact ... to the extent that you could have foreknown or predicted them based on the positions the person has publicly articulated and/or various attitudes he has demonstrated in the past.


    This is only true if you take an extremist view of what democracy is - that your "elected representative" literally represents you in everything. I don't view democracy as a matter of electing "representatives". I view it as a matter of choosing from a list of options who you want in power, whether they fully represent you or not. In that case, there is nothing wrong with voting for someone who has a chance of winning but who does not represent you as well as someone who has no chance whatsoever of winning, because the latter is not even a real option.

    I think that casting votes on parties that have no chance of winning just because they represent your own views is highly irresponsible, unless there is nothing you can do to prevent the worst option from winning.

    I don't think that, for example, when I vote for Conservatives here in the UK in order to keep Labour out, that I am supporting Conservatives pro-"gαy marriage" abominations. Having this purist view of democracy where you can only support someone who is perfectly representative of yourself is, I think, silly.

    Offline John Grace

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5521
    • Reputation: +121/-6
    • Gender: Male
    Voting for Trump?
    « Reply #145 on: October 29, 2016, 06:39:19 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    in order to keep Labour out


    It could be argued that British nationalism is dead but it would be fantastic if the likes of UKIP could unseat  Margaret Hodge in Barking. In the context of Trump and United States voting for him is good old fashioned common sense.


    Offline St Ignatius

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1024
    • Reputation: +795/-158
    • Gender: Male
    Voting for Trump?
    « Reply #146 on: October 29, 2016, 08:50:14 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Charlemagne
    Quote from: St Ignatius
    Now let's add this to the mix... could this most recent development of today be the "October Surprise" of the century? Things are definitely getting interesting, IMO.

    http://www.infowars.com/breaking-fbi-reopens-investigation-into-clinton-emails/


    I suspect the FBI now has all 33,000 e-mails (if it didn't have them all along). Agents might have found them on the seized devices of either Weiner or Abedin.

    http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/10/3_competing_theories_on_why_the_fbi_reopened_the_hillary_email_server_investigation.html

    October 28, 2016

    3 competing theories on why the FBI re-opened the Hillary email server investigation

    By Thomas Lifson

    There is no question that re-opening the FBI Investigation into Hillary Clinton’s email server is a big deal. The FBI normally avoids acting just before an election in order to avoid charges of political manipulation.  NBC reports:

    The FBI is reviewing a new batch of Hillary Clinton emails, bureau director James Comey said in a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee on Friday.

    "In connection with an unrelated case, the FBI has learned of the existence of emails that appear to be pertinent to the investigation … I agreed that the FBI should take appropriate investigative steps designed to allow investigators to review these emails to determine whether they contain classified information, as well as to assess their importance to our investigation," he wrote.

    The very first thing to note is that Comey made no mention of a grand jury.  The emails whose existence he learned of may have been the result of a subpoena in another investigation. Update: It was announced ten days ago that grand jury would be convened to investigate Weiner's sexting "by the end of the month."  The timing of Comey's letter strongly suggests that the devices containing new emails were obtained through a grand jury subpoena, with no immunity deals or evidence destruction needed. If that is the case, further subpoenas are quite possible, a tool that was left unused in the investigation to date.

    There are 3 competing theories as to why he might be doing this now that come to mind.

    1: He might be seeking to restore his badly damaged reputation, recognizing that the damage he has inflicted on the FBI is substantial.  Three days ago, American Thinker published an open letter from a retired FBI Agent, Hugh Galyean, that laid out some of the damage Comey has inflicted on the institution he leads.  There is little doubt that this reached many in the FBI family, putting in print what people have only whispered about.  If those silenced voices start speaking out, Comey could face a serious loss of face. In this scenario, he is heading off a staff rebellion, possibly including mass resignations.

    2: Rush Limbaugh today discussed an alternative theory, that by announcing an FBI Investigation resuming, Comey is putting a lid on further attention to Wikileaks. I guess this means that Clinton forces will argue we must wait for the investigation to be complete (after the election) before speaking about what the evil Russians are planting into our politics.

    3: It is possible that something so dramatic came up in the pertinent emails that postponing a public reaction by not announcing the reopening of the investigation would, be regarded as political interference by covering up a smoking gun until after the election. In this scenario, Comey is assuming the evidence cannot be suppressed, and that he would be held accountable after it comes out. This scenario also indicates that we could be headed for a constitutional crisis, involving the possible indictment of a president-elect before an election. Or the evidence being turned over to the House of Representatives for impeachment hearings.

    We’ll know more in the coming days, and I am sure there are other possible theories and motives. It is shame that we have to speculate, and that the once-respected FBI director is now subject to analysis of his political gamesmanship

    ???????

    I was listening to Limbaugh when this news broke... no.2 theory was initiated by a caller to the show. He mentioned another player to the senerio, Kim.com. It was very interesting, too say the least.

    Offline OHCA

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2834
    • Reputation: +1866/-112
    • Gender: Male
    Voting for Trump?
    « Reply #147 on: October 29, 2016, 08:50:52 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: John Grace
    The good church going black people are fed up of the Democrats and the rapists, muggers and drug gangs giving blacks a bad name. Same in Britain with church going blacks backing the vote to leave EU.  Same applies to the Mexicans. Not every Mexican is a cholo.


    I truly wish we had more "good church going black people" here.  At least in my part of the country, there are very few colored Catholics.  The older generations of colored protestants behave themselves pretty good for the most part.  But the younger generation of colored protestants just go to church tomake their "aunties" and mamas and grandmamas happy and get some of their fried chicken Sunday afternoon.  Even if they aren't outright thugs, they, and the older generations too for the most part, vote Democrat.

    Offline John Grace

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5521
    • Reputation: +121/-6
    • Gender: Male
    Voting for Trump?
    « Reply #148 on: October 29, 2016, 10:54:41 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: OHCA
    Quote from: John Grace
    The good church going black people are fed up of the Democrats and the rapists, muggers and drug gangs giving blacks a bad name. Same in Britain with church going blacks backing the vote to leave EU.  Same applies to the Mexicans. Not every Mexican is a cholo.


    I truly wish we had more "good church going black people" here.  At least in my part of the country, there are very few colored Catholics.  The older generations of colored protestants behave themselves pretty good for the most part.  But the younger generation of colored protestants just go to church tomake their "aunties" and mamas and grandmamas happy and get some of their fried chicken Sunday afternoon.  Even if they aren't outright thugs, they, and the older generations too for the most part, vote Democrat.



    Some of the Irish pro-life groups have had a young black girl speak at their meetings. She seems to be a protestant. Black people will vote for Trump because they are fed up of the rot and are directly affected by things. As things stand Ireland has too many black people. It's encouraging to see blacks voting for Trump and a move away from voting Democrat.

    Offline cassini

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3952
    • Reputation: +3170/-275
    • Gender: Male
    Voting for Trump?
    « Reply #149 on: October 30, 2016, 12:21:51 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • http://thehirschfiles.blogspot.ie/2016/10/cuckservativesnevertrumps.html?m=1

    Cuckservatives/NeverTrumps

    It was then, in the black heart of the dreaded night, that I finished engorging myself on the last drops of blood of the now-pallid girl who I held in my icy claws.  I dropped the body of my victim--a willing sycophant who dared not resist me--and I passed from my still and quiet realm of darkness.

    Me going to my computer
    to cause Alt-Right mischief.
     I entered your world through my portal--a dark art taught to me by the Archons of Delightful Evil.  My veins filled with freshly stolen vitality, I softly sat on my throne of pain, and with my soulless, lifeless white eyes, I gazed at the screen and began to work my evil.

     I suppose that's how a Trump supporter from the Alt-Right is supposed to live his existence.  Even now, typing this, the beasts in my chamber are ripping apart the carcasses of those upon whom I have feasted.

     Honestly, the manner of how NeverTrumps demonize us has grown staggeringly ridiculous.

     People, in a Freemasonic republic controlled by amoral, unrestrained oligarchs, your culture is bound to supply you with nothing but cowardly men capable of leading no one.  In such a circuмstance, you are left voting for people whom you trust will serve the will of his constituency and who will hopefully not betray you.    

     And in light of these circuмstances, every candidate is a wild card.

     This fact is lost on most people, especially NeverTrumpers.  These Cruzlims, these cuckservatives, fail to grasp that our society was set up for failure from the beginning, and that every vote for a hopeful candidate was a vote for a man who wouldn't turn the State's gun on its own people.  This reality escapes them.

     So, when Donald Trump enters the political scene, it becomes clear to one and all that he is the wildest card of them all.  From the outset, Trump appears unsafe to the NeverTrumps.  He, in fact, strikes them as a threat.

     Yet, the true threat that Trump poses is that he shatters the cuckservative's delusions about our political system.  His presence in this election shows the unsteady options that are presented to us in every election, as we have become totally dependent on the nature of man for our well being.  In America, our prosperity is dependent on an unreachable class of people who are guided by nothing but their bellies and their genitals.  Trump is the epitome of such hedonism.  His bluster, his wealth, the alpha factor that he has with women--this all shatters the illusions of cuckservatives.

     Indeed, the cuckservatives are quite delusional.

     For the NeverTrumps, becoming the president of the United States is an apotheosis.  A man elected president is an elevation into godhood.  In perfect oxymoronic fashion, our nation's godless founding is, to them, a divine moment of word become flesh.  The signing of the Declaration of Independence is somehow an Incarnation, much the same way that God came into the world to be born as Jesus Christ.

     And so, if it is true that America has a divine Manifest Destiny--whether the flavor be FreeMasonic, Mormon, or broadly deist--then it will only do to have an appropriate god-man to lead us.  The president must have all the trimmings of a wholesome dandy.  If we continue to elect posers such as McCain, Romney, or Cruz, we are somehow going to set ourselves back on a course for the wholesome 1950s.  The NeverTrumps cannot accept the circuмstances for what they are--that the world has transformed into a sort of dystopic vicious place in which we are forced in accepting whatever allies we can find.

     As the Right becomes ever-more surrounded by our enemies, our battle tactics become more vicious.  We switch to knives and bayonets.  We all must become soldiers.  As Anthony Esolen said in his recent article in Crisis Magazine:

    The Soldier does not say, “I will fight, but only if I do not have to share the field with these others,” which others may be traditionalists, the ecuмenically minded, Protestants friendly to the Catholic Church, or Catholics who disagree with him on some political point. The Soldier is grateful for his brothers in arms, and if their uniforms are a little different from his, he figures that the Lord of Hosts will sort the matter out in the end.

     NeverTrumps are not soldiers at all.  They would shoot their allies in the back of the head, rather than join together in a common cause for a mutual victory.  Esolen would label these people as bitter "avengers."  He defines such characters as men who aim their rifle at Catholics...

    ...and many of them will be good Catholics who disagree with him about strategy. The Avenger will not go forth to war unless he approves the strategy in all its details, which of course will never happen. He prefers to be an armchair general rather than to be a private slogging in the trenches.
    That describes NeverTrumpers to a tee.  They will not settle for survival.  They must have the moon.  In a dark time when sympathy and a helping hand are scarce, these traitors can only offer you their nasty attitude.  And in the end, all they prove is that in war, they should never be handed a loaded weapon, nor should anyone ever turn their backs to them--ever.

     Rather than let this election be about the future of America, these people have tried focus the entire event on...their feelings.  They want America to see their hatred for Trump and anyone who votes for him.  They will go on and on, parroting Glenn Beck and articles from Red State.  They will be all over the map with their sloganeering, which only adds up to a sniveling, giant black miasma of inchoate rage.

     They grasp nothing.

     As a result of their ignorance and reliance on their emotions, the mismanagement of their own feelings brings destruction into the electoral process, pushing us closer to Hillary Clinton's wet dream for a Third World War.  Meanwhile, these people feel that, by destroying Trump in this election, they can happily wait--with no consequence--until the 2020 election, when they can finally vote for Ted Cruz again.

    Delicious
    NeverTrumpers (and the shitlibs that they ultimately help) are like rabbits. Their survival instincts are to stay in a pack in a meadow, fearful to take risks, living with the idea in mind that yes, predators will grab and kill the outliers of their herd.

     Trump voters and people on the Alt-Right, such as myself, are like wolves. We're unafraid of the wild, confronting the unknown and our enemies, counter-punching those that assault us, and going after what we require.

     K-selected wolves take time to invest in our youth, we groom them to be just as vicious and strong as their mommies and daddies, and we show them how to hold their own. r-selected rabbits just eat up the resources and hope that some of their offspring might outlive the predators.

    The rabbits would rather vote in a murderer than a meany.  Explain this contradiction to them, and emotional rhetoric is all they have to offer:

    The Alt-Right is a swamp of hysterical evil...a swamp of nαzι evil beyond my initial ability to imagine.  I am the enemy of these fascist pigs.
    These people can't keep up with me.  They can't grasp anything that is spoken in a dialectic conversation.  They are like liberals.  NeverTrumpers can only relate to weak-jawed, pussy-whipped promise-breakers like George Bush.  They are only capable of believing the lies of RHINOs, as anything else triggers their uncharity and hate.  They can process nothing beyond Neo-Conservative lies.  And because of them, the "Right Wing" of the past 30 years has been a pathetic ever-losing joke.

     Sometimes I like to say that I've reached a certain level of disdain for the world--I like to state that I've reached Level Jonah (which, I suppose, could be the equivalent of belonging to the Kult of Kek).  And though I am ready to see the people in this world suffer for their crimes against the universe and against God, I am always open to better avenues.  The world doesn't have to burn.  I much prefer mercy to judgement.  Yet, the NeverTrumpers are more like Jonah than I would ever be.  They rail at Nineveh, begging for God to destroy it, never considering the chance that the city might right itself back on a better course.  

     The thinking of NeverTrumps is hopelessly flawed.  They think that by joining the Left and destroying the Right in this election, they will set everything back to the tapioca Neo-Con days of McCain, Romney, and Rubio.  But should they succeed in sabotaging the Right's shot at winning this election, they will become utterly terrified at the ultras they will have unleashed with their idiotic and blind actions.

     The political spectrum of the past has been destroyed.  "Conservative" never meant a thing.  We know it, we are coming, and we don't give a damn about what you think.