Classic Americanism, rightly condemned by Leo XIII.

So ... denying that Christ the King has sovereignty over nations.

But that's V2 teaching, so Pervost should approve.

I was gonna say “moreso denying a pope has sovereignty over a nation” but then I realized a Trad Catholic might say it’s the same thing

but Then this raised a question for Me

do you believe that a true pope (I know you don’t think this Leo is one, I just mean an actually true pope for the sake of argument) is capable of making commands that are POLITICALLY destructive and if that’s the case do you think such a pope could he “recognize and resisted” in the POLITICAL arena or do you believe Catholic leaders would be obliged to cooperate in the destruction of their own countries in that case?

to pick an example (but don’t nitpick the example too much) let’s say there was a pope who agreed with you on all the major theological issues, EENS, TLM only, V2 holy orders invalid, the works, but he believed that immigration restrictions were illegitimate and unchristian and he commanded all leaders to open their borders

as a Catholic would you see Vance as obligated to open the American border in obedience?

I was gonna say “moreso denying a pope has sovereignty over a nation” but then I realized a Trad Catholic might say it’s the same thing

but Then this raised a question for Me

do you believe that a true pope (I know you don’t think this Leo is one, I just mean an actually true pope for the sake of argument) is capable of making commands that are POLITICALLY destructive and if that’s the case do you think such a pope could he “recognize and resisted” in the POLITICAL arena or do you believe Catholic leaders would be obliged to cooperate in the destruction of their own countries in that case?

to pick an example (but don’t nitpick the example too much) let’s say there was a pope who agreed with you on all the major theological issues, EENS, TLM only, V2 holy orders invalid, the works, but he believed that immigration restrictions were illegitimate and unchristian and he commanded all leaders to open their borders

as a Catholic would you see Vance as obligated to open the American border in obedience?

There are many true popes that made terrible political decisions that still have consequences today:

1066 The destruction of Anglo-Saxon England by the Normans under the papal banner. England stopped being the Land of Saints 
1152 Divorce of Eleanor of Aquitaine and Louis VII of France. She goes on to marry Henry II Plantagenet of England and takes half of France with her. 
1892 Au Milieu des Sollicitudes - Pope Leon XIII informs French Catholics to work with the masonic republic
1926 Condemnation of Action Française by Pius XI
1929 Pope Pius XI tells the Cristeros to stop fighting

I guess this a good example of separation of church and state.

It brings to mind the words of Antony Blinken while visiting Israel after the October 7th "affair."

"“I come before you not only as the United States secretary of state,” Antony Blinken told Israel during a live-streamed press conference in Tel Aviv on Thursday, “but also as a Jew.” IMO Vancy Pants didn't want to upset his AIPAC handlers or was ordered not to kiss the ring by TPTB. 

Which is also a heresy.

Which shows you the "Catholic" religion that Vance practices is probably not the real deal.