Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: US takes out Iranian military leader  (Read 6773 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SoldierOfChrist

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 641
  • Reputation: +423/-31
  • Gender: Male
Re: US takes out Iranian military leader
« Reply #75 on: January 05, 2020, 12:47:20 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Here is a misconception that I see on here a lot: the idea that the political state of Israel is of one mind.  It is not of one mind any more than the United States is of one mind.  You’ve got religious Jews, liberal Jews, and cultural Jews.  You’ve also got a cynical group of elites, who are the criminal deep state like we have here.  Bibi is not a member of this group.  That is why they are trying to remove him.  So when you say the Iran plot originated in Israel, which faction created the plot?  I will tell you I do not think it did.  But even if it did, talking about the location is not good enough.  Hey, maybe +ABL was visiting the Holy Land in the 60’s and he came up with this plot to take out Iran.  There it is.  Plot started in Israel.  By the archbishop.  I knew it.  See what I mean?  Did the deep state in Israel come up with the plan?  Did Bibi’s Conservative party come up with it?  Could have just as easily been hatched in Washington by the conservatives who are of one mind with the conservatives in Israel.  Or was it Israel’s deep state which is of one mind with Hillary and her ilk?  No it wasn’t, because those israeli’s are helping Isis and they’re helping Iran.  And when I speak of Iran, I’m talking about the Ayatollah and not the people.  Oh but he says “death to Israel.  Why would they help him?”  Because they’re cynical and they also help terrorists kill American civilians here.  The deep state in America is in bed with the deep state in Israel and in bed with the Ayatollah.  Iran has to be liberated for real.  Not like we “liberated” Iraq, by taking it over and letting Iran control it.  No.  It has to be liberated for real, from these maniacs who took over during Carter’s presidency.  Why do we have to do it?  Because Iran is the REAL center of middle eastern terrorism.  It’s the financier, the staging point, and the safe house.  And our deep state is involved with them.  Iran HAS to be taken down.  Not with “carpet bombs”, “shock and awe”, or any sort of murderous theatrics.  No.  With strategic hits on the targets identified by our military intelligence, until their regime agrees to stop working with the criminals in our government, or until we’ve killed their entire leadership and given their country a very raw deal.  Either way, they must be dominated.  Them, China, and North Korea are the trifecta.  Kim is playing ball.  Zi is being civil.  Iran is not at all playing ball.  They are continuing to work with Kerry, Peℓσѕι, Schumer, Comey, Hillary, Obama, etc.  if we are going to clean house in our own country, we have to clean house in theirs.  They are intimately involved with the criminals in our government.  Drain the swamp includes draining theirs.  After them, Israel.  And then we move on to tying up loose ends in our own country.  This is not something we can shy away from.  It is our duty to fight these people until they are annihilated.  The criminals I mean.  We CANNOT allow Iran to continue on like they have.  They HAVE attacked us.  For years they’ve been attacking us.  They’ve infiltrated us.

    To be clear, I am not a fan of Israel and I do not support unfounded attacks on sovereign nations to be the world’s policemen, like we did in Iraq.  And we should not function as Israel’s security force either.  However, these attacks by Trump were NOT unfounded and they are in the interest of protecting US.  Not the world.

    That’ll do.  Going to bed.  Have a blessed Sunday everyone.

    Offline klasG4e

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2307
    • Reputation: +1344/-235
    • Gender: Male
    Re: US takes out Iranian military leader
    « Reply #76 on: January 05, 2020, 04:36:13 AM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
  • Here is a misconception that I see on here a lot: the idea that the political state of Israel is of one mind.  It is not of one mind any more than the United States is of one mind.  You’ve got religious Jews, liberal Jews, and cultural Jews.  You’ve also got a cynical group of elites, who are the criminal deep state like we have here.  Bibi is not a member of this group.  That is why they are trying to remove him.  So when you say the Iran plot originated in Israel, which faction created the plot?  I will tell you I do not think it did.  But even if it did, talking about the location is not good enough.  Hey, maybe +ABL was visiting the Holy Land in the 60’s and he came up with this plot to take out Iran.  There it is.  Plot started in Israel.  By the archbishop.  I knew it.  See what I mean?  Did the deep state in Israel come up with the plan?  Did Bibi’s Conservative party come up with it?  Could have just as easily been hatched in Washington by the conservatives who are of one mind with the conservatives in Israel.  Or was it Israel’s deep state which is of one mind with Hillary and her ilk?  No it wasn’t, because those israeli’s are helping Isis and they’re helping Iran.  And when I speak of Iran, I’m talking about the Ayatollah and not the people.  Oh but he says “death to Israel.  Why would they help him?”  Because they’re cynical and they also help terrorists kill American civilians here.  The deep state in America is in bed with the deep state in Israel and in bed with the Ayatollah.  Iran has to be liberated for real.  Not like we “liberated” Iraq, by taking it over and letting Iran control it.  No.  It has to be liberated for real, from these maniacs who took over during Carter’s presidency.  Why do we have to do it?  Because Iran is the REAL center of middle eastern terrorism.  It’s the financier, the staging point, and the safe house.  And our deep state is involved with them.  Iran HAS to be taken down.  Not with “carpet bombs”, “shock and awe”, or any sort of murderous theatrics.  No.  With strategic hits on the targets identified by our military intelligence, until their regime agrees to stop working with the criminals in our government, or until we’ve killed their entire leadership and given their country a very raw deal.  Either way, they must be dominated.  Them, China, and North Korea are the trifecta.  Kim is playing ball.  Zi is being civil.  Iran is not at all playing ball.  They are continuing to work with Kerry, Peℓσѕι, Schumer, Comey, Hillary, Obama, etc.  if we are going to clean house in our own country, we have to clean house in theirs.  They are intimately involved with the criminals in our government.  Drain the swamp includes draining theirs.  After them, Israel.  And then we move on to tying up loose ends in our own country.  This is not something we can shy away from.  It is our duty to fight these people until they are annihilated.  The criminals I mean.  We CANNOT allow Iran to continue on like they have.  They HAVE attacked us.  For years they’ve been attacking us.  They’ve infiltrated us.

    To be clear, I am not a fan of Israel and I do not support unfounded attacks on sovereign nations to be the world’s policemen, like we did in Iraq.  And we should not function as Israel’s security force either.  However, these attacks by Trump were NOT unfounded and they are in the interest of protecting US.  Not the world.

    That’ll do.  Going to bed.  Have a blessed Sunday everyone.

    I suspect there are a fair number of folks on CathInfo who would be more or less favorable to your post here.  They don't want others to think in a too one sided way towards the modern state of Israel.  They don't seem to raise that concern about Iran.  It's almost hard not to judge them too harshly out of hand considering all the pro Israel and anti Iran propaganda a good number of them have been subjected to for many years of their lives.

    There are others on CathInfo including myself who take a very jaundiced view to near any of the official U.S. government narratives that are fed to us by the powers that be in America.  The official lying narratives go way back.  Here are just a few of the classics: 1) With no doubt whatsoever Spain blew up the U.S. battleship Maine, 2) FDR did not know that Japan was going to attack Pearl Harbor, 3) It was necessary to drop the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki,  4) Tonkin Gulf Incident of 1964  was all true the way it was reported at the time to the Congress 5) Israel's 1967 attack on U.S.S. Liberty was a case of mistaken identity by Israel, 6) 9-11 was carried out by 19 hijackers, bla, bla, bla,  7) Iraq had WMD.

    You state that "Iran HAS to be taken down"  and just before that you tell us why: "Because Iran is the REAL center of middle eastern terrorism."  You also give us your plan of action: "With strategic hits on the targets identified by our military intelligence, until their regime agrees to stop working with the criminals in our government, or until we’ve killed their entire leadership and given their country a very raw deal."

    So, according to you and many others like John Bolton, Mike Pompeo, and the POTUS,  " Iran is the REAL center of middle eastern terrorism."  What exactly is terrorism, however, in the context of the largely unwelcome (and in Syria clearly illegal) occupation of U.S. forces in the Middle East?  Are you familiar with the term asymmetric warfare?  It is a type of warfare where generally one side is significantly more powerful militarily, thus forcing the weaker side to counteract their adversary in an unconventional way.  In terms of trying to control the narrative to their advantage the U.S. propaganda machine does not speak in terms of unconventional warfare, but rather in terms of terrorism.

    Why does Iran engage and support what the MSM invariably calls terrorism?   The answer is rather simple.  They consider it a part of what has been referred to as fourth generation warfare, a kind of warfare they consider quite legitimate in driving the Western invaders/occupiers out of their land.  They know only too well that if they had the military power of the U.S., the U.S. would not be occupying the Middle East in the first place.  Just as we would not allow any standing army or militia from Iran or Iraq to occupy Canada, much less the U.S. so too for them regarding U.S. in the Middle East.

    If a foreign power was occupying America and killing all kinds of innocent Americans in the process would we TradCats and others not be trying to drive them out.  No doubt we would be engaging in asymmetric warfare or at least I hope we would!

    What would we think of a country that somehow placed sanctions on Canada or Mexico which directly resulted in the death of 500,000 or more children.  Would we look the other way and say well at least the country doing the sanctioning is not carrying out terrorism in Canada or Mexico?  Are you not aware of how many innocent civilians U.S. sanctions on Iraq caused?  Right now our sanctions are working to devastate the economy of Iran. Again, how would we feel if Iran somehow could and did place devastating sanctions on our country?  

    Your plan to take down Iran is not only reckless, it is unrealistic, immoral.and extremely dangerous and costly.  It also clearly violates the long held Catholic teaching on just war.

    I give you the favor of the doubt in meaning well Soldier, but as you may well know, the road to hell is paved with good intentions.





    Offline Nishant Xavier

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2873
    • Reputation: +1894/-1751
    • Gender: Male
    Re: US takes out Iranian military leader
    « Reply #77 on: January 05, 2020, 07:06:07 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The US should not go to war with Iran. Iran's options are few and limited. They'll probably grumble about this for a while and let it pass.

    What the US should do is form an alliance with Russia. It should emphasize shared Christian principles, and opposition to Islamism.

    тαℓмυdism was behind Bolshevism and Communism. That's an open secret. Zionists have been trying to spark a military confrontation between US and Russia for a long time now. They tried it in Syria; and, by the Grace of God, were defeated. They're still trying for that.

    That's their end game. Probably the election year is too difficult to resolve this - but to be two steps ahead of them, go for a US-Russia alliance. The Cold War is over. The Russian people have returned to their Orthodox Christian Faith. They are more Christian than many in Europe, and at least as Christian if not more than many in America. Once America and Russia are allied, the threat of war will pass.

    Offline SoldierOfChrist

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 641
    • Reputation: +423/-31
    • Gender: Male
    Re: US takes out Iranian military leader
    « Reply #78 on: January 05, 2020, 07:55:48 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I suspect there are a fair number of folks on CathInfo who would be more or less favorable to your post here.  They don't want others to think in a too one sided way towards the modern state of Israel.  They don't seem to raise that concern about Iran.  
    I did specify the ruling power in Iran.  There are good guys in their regime as well.

    It's almost hard not to judge them too harshly out of hand considering all the pro Israel and anti Iran propaganda a good number of them have been subjected to for many years of their lives.
    Very true.

    There are others on CathInfo including myself who take a very jaundiced view to near any of the official U.S. government narratives that are fed to us by the powers that be in America.  The official lying narratives go way back.  Here are just a few of the classics: 1) With no doubt whatsoever Spain blew up the U.S. battleship Maine, 2) FDR did not know that Japan was going to attack Pearl Harbor, 3) It was necessary to drop the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki,  4) Tonkin Gulf Incident of 1964  was all true the way it was reported at the time to the Congress 5) Israel's 1967 attack on U.S.S. Liberty was a case of mistaken identity by Israel, 6) 9-11 was carried out by 19 hijackers, bla, bla, bla,  7) Iraq had WMD.
    No disagreement between us here either.

    You state that "Iran HAS to be taken down"  and just before that you tell us why: "Because Iran is the REAL center of middle eastern terrorism."  You also give us your plan of action: "With strategic hits on the targets identified by our military intelligence, until their regime agrees to stop working with the criminals in our government, or until we’ve killed their entire leadership and given their country a very raw deal."

    So, according to you and many others like John Bolton, Mike Pompeo, and the POTUS,  " Iran is the REAL center of middle eastern terrorism."  What exactly is terrorism, however, in the context of the largely unwelcome (and in Syria clearly illegal) occupation of U.S. forces in the Middle East?  Are you familiar with the term asymmetric warfare?  It is a type of warfare where generally one side is significantly more powerful militarily, thus forcing the weaker side to counteract their adversary in an unconventional way.  In terms of trying to control the narrative to their advantage the U.S. propaganda machine does not speak in terms of unconventional warfare, but rather in terms of terrorism.
    When I refer to “terrorism” I am referring to the phenomena of civilian bombings, hostage situations, mass shootings, and other topics that hold the attention of the news cycle, using psychological manipulation to scare the public into hypnosis and docility.  What most people don’t realize about these events is that they are being orchestrated by our deep state, in bed with Israel’s deep state, Iran, Australia, New Zealand, etc.  This is not a reaction to asymmetric warfare as they’d have you believe.  These are shock doctrine events being used for psychological manipulation, gun grabs, war powers acts, etc. 

    Why does Iran engage and support what the MSM invariably calls terrorism?   The answer is rather simple.  They consider it a part of what has been referred to as fourth generation warfare, a kind of warfare they consider quite legitimate in driving the Western invaders/occupiers out of their land.  They know only too well that if they had the military power of the U.S., the U.S. would not be occupying the Middle East in the first place.  Just as we would not allow any standing army or militia from Iran or Iraq to occupy Canada, much less the U.S. so too for them regarding U.S. in the Middle East.

    If a foreign power was occupying America and killing all kinds of innocent Americans in the process would we TradCats and others not be trying to drive them out.  No doubt we would be engaging in asymmetric warfare or at least I hope we would!

    What would we think of a country that somehow placed sanctions on Canada or Mexico which directly resulted in the death of 500,000 or more children.  Would we look the other way and say well at least the country doing the sanctioning is not carrying out terrorism in Canada or Mexico?  Are you not aware of how many innocent civilians U.S. sanctions on Iraq caused?  Right now our sanctions are working to devastate the economy of Iran. Again, how would we feel if Iran somehow could and did place devastating sanctions on our country?  

    Your plan to take down Iran is not only reckless, it is unrealistic, immoral.and extremely dangerous and costly.  It also clearly violates the long held Catholic teaching on just war.
    It does not.  We were attacked by these deep states on 911 and we’ll continue to be attacked until they’re dead.  We’ll continue having our rights taken away until these people are toast.  Hillary, Bolton, Comey, Obama, and all of the other friends of the Ayatollah.



    Offline alaric

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3384
    • Reputation: +2492/-435
    • Gender: Male
    Re: US takes out Iranian military leader
    « Reply #79 on: January 05, 2020, 08:16:05 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    Here is a misconception that I see on here a lot: the idea that the political state of Israel is of one mind.  It is not of one mind any more than the United States is of one mind.  You’ve got religious Jews, liberal Jews, and cultural Jews.
    Clearly you don't understand the concept of jewry. judaism is a racial/ethnic concept based on a "religion" that pits them against the rest of the world. They are in perpetual war against the rest of humanity since the Crucifixion (which is why the Crucifix repels them so much). Although they might be divisive in various factions, make no mistake, at the end of the day they all are on board for the same cause. The only question they ask as a collective is : "Is it good for jews?"


    That's it. That's the only thing that matters to them in the end.


    And killing this Iranian General probably might not be in their best interest.


    My personal opinion is it is not. Although, the zionists think it is, because that is who ordered this hit and Trump complied like the typical willing American lapdog president when it comes to the god's chosen. Trump chose the most extreme measure he could to look like the big dog in that part of the world, which at times you have to be when it comes to these people.


    But this is different. This guy was a hero who defeated the ISIS as well as keeping zionism in check in the area. ISIS was organized and funded by the zionists in America and israel , this is no big secret over there and this guy was defeating them in Iraq, Syria and elsewhere. So he was selected for extinction, NOT because he was a "danger" to America. But only to American/israeli greater plan of defeating and occupying several nations surrounding israel that has implemented for many years now.


    I believe this barbaric act could  backfire on the zionists who have a habit of overplaying their hand at times due to hubris. If anything, this assassination could  possibly unite the muslims who at their core are divided between Shia and Sunni and no more relevant than right there in that part of the world.If that happens, israel and the U.S. will have a problem. These people have known for a long time what the agenda is between the world jewry and the Western powers in the ME , but they have always been too divisive to collectively do anything about it. And this is not by mistake, The West ( and by West I'm including israel) has bought off various factions and leadership within Islam for many years now.And until they become a unifying force, they will be powerless to Western aggression and zionists policies. But hubris of the West is also a weakness and so is the cunning of reason described by Hegel. Even in the bible there are examples of what man meant for evil God turned into good.


    I'm not sure how Iran is going to react to all this, but one thing i know is that we're over there, not the opposite. Iran has never threatened the U.S. until we have become a direct threat to them OVER THERE and become directly involved in their internal politics for some kind of financial gain. They are a very old civilization and home to the first truly "global" empire in the Medo-Persians and also a very spiritual people, not only in Islam but going back to the Zoroastrians and the concept of monotheism while the Euro's were still worshiping trees and rocks. Anyway, my point being, these people are not stupid and have survived thousands of years, so whatever decision they make will be one of survival, not only for them, but for all the Persian and Turkish and Kurdish people of the SW Asian area over there. I don't believe history or more importantly God will allow their extinction at the behest of a few war mongering, bloodthirsty  zionists and their American lackeys.


    Offline Nishant Xavier

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2873
    • Reputation: +1894/-1751
    • Gender: Male
    Re: US takes out Iranian military leader
    « Reply #80 on: January 05, 2020, 09:20:04 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Just because тαℓмυdism is evil, doesn't mean Islamism is good. Islamism is a major threat for Christianity in the long run. The solution is to evangelize and equip missionaries to bring millions of Muslims trapped in Islamism to salvation in Jesus Christ. I am not in favor of unjust wars; but Islamism is a very serious challenge.

    This should be another reminder to us careless modern Christians today that we must evangelize or die; https://blogs.ancientfaith.com/morningoffering/2016/05/%EF%BB%BFthere-2-billion-muslims-world/

    "After 80%, expect daily intimidation and violent jihad, some State-run ethnic cleansing, and even some genocide, as these nations drive out the infidels, and move toward 100% Muslim, such as has been experienced and in some ways is on-going in:

    Bangladesh — Muslim 83%
    Egypt — Muslim 90%
    Gaza — Muslim 98.7%
    Indonesia — Muslim 86.1%
    Iran — Muslim 98%
    Iraq — Muslim 97%
    Jordan — Muslim 92%
    Morocco — Muslim 98.7%
    Pakistan — Muslim 97%
    Syria — Muslim 90%
    Tajikistan — Muslim 90%
    Turkey — Muslim 99.8%
    United Arab Emirates — Muslim 96%

    100% will usher in the peace of ‘Dar-es-Salaam’ — the Islamic House of Peace.. Here there’s supposed to be peace, because everybody is a Muslim, the Madrasses are the only schools, and the Koran is the only word, such as in:

    Afghanistan — Muslim 100%
    Saudi Arabia — Muslim 100%
    Somalia — Muslim 100%
    Yemen — Muslim 100%

    Unfortunately, peace is never achieved, as in these 100% states the most radical Muslims intimidate and spew hatred, and satisfy their blood lust by killing less radical Muslims, for a variety of reasons.

    Before I was nine I had learned the basic canon of Arab life. It was me against my brother; me and my brother against our father; my family against my cousins and the clan; the clan against the tribe; the tribe against the world, and all of us against the infidel?. — Leon Uris, ‘The Haj’

    It is important to understand that in some countries, with well under 100% Muslim populations, such as France, the minority Muslim populations live in ghettos, within which they are 100% Muslim, and within which they live by Sharia Law. They are not interested in being assimilated into the culture of the country they immigrated to. The national police do not even enter these ghettos. There are no national courts, nor schools, nor non-Muslim religious facilities. In such situations, Muslims do not integrate into the community at large. The children attend madrasses. They learn only the Koran. To even associate with an infidel is a crime punishable with death.

    Therefore, in some areas of certain nations, Muslim Imams and extremists exercise more power than the national average would indicate.

    Today’s 2 billion Muslims make up 28% of the world’s population. But their birth rates dwarf the birth rates of Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, Jews, and all other believers. Muslims will exceed 50% of the world’s population by the end of this century [unless Islamism is stopped - XavierSem]

    Adapted from Dr. Peter Hammond’s book: Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat"

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46923
    • Reputation: +27795/-5167
    • Gender: Male
    Re: US takes out Iranian military leader
    « Reply #81 on: January 05, 2020, 10:01:07 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Just because тαℓмυdism is evil, doesn't mean Islamism is good. 

    I don't believe that anyone here thinks that it is.

    Offline ByzCat3000

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1951
    • Reputation: +518/-147
    • Gender: Male
    Re: US takes out Iranian military leader
    « Reply #82 on: January 05, 2020, 10:16:02 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The US should not go to war with Iran. Iran's options are few and limited. They'll probably grumble about this for a while and let it pass.

    What the US should do is form an alliance with Russia. It should emphasize shared Christian principles, and opposition to Islamism.

    тαℓмυdism was behind Bolshevism and Communism. That's an open secret. Zionists have been trying to spark a military confrontation between US and Russia for a long time now. They tried it in Syria; and, by the Grace of God, were defeated. They're still trying for that.

    That's their end game. Probably the election year is too difficult to resolve this - but to be two steps ahead of them, go for a US-Russia alliance. The Cold War is over. The Russian people have returned to their Orthodox Christian Faith. They are more Christian than many in Europe, and at least as Christian if not more than many in America. Once America and Russia are allied, the threat of war will pass.
    I just want to note that Russia is allied with Iran, and not with Israel.

    I'm OK with that.  Israel is the way bigger problem


    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46923
    • Reputation: +27795/-5167
    • Gender: Male
    Re: US takes out Iranian military leader
    « Reply #83 on: January 05, 2020, 10:38:35 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I just want to note that Russia is allied with Iran, and not with Israel.

    I'm OK with that.  Israel is the way bigger problem

    Well, this video shows how Israel is the link between Trump and Putin.


    Offline klasG4e

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2307
    • Reputation: +1344/-235
    • Gender: Male
    Re: US takes out Iranian military leader
    « Reply #84 on: January 05, 2020, 04:00:52 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • klasG4e: Your plan to take down Iran is not only reckless, it is unrealistic, immoral.and extremely dangerous and costly.  It also clearly violates the long held Catholic teaching on just war.
    SoldierOfChrist:It does not.  We were attacked by these deep states on 911 and we’ll continue to be attacked until they’re dead.  We’ll continue having our rights taken away until these people are toast.  Hillary, Bolton, Comey, Obama, and all of the other friends of the Ayatollah.
    ****************************************************************************

    Please be so kind as to inform us of just how exactly Iran was in any way, shape, or form part of the attacks on 9-11.  Also, since you want to take down Iran by way of "strategic hits on the targets identified by our military intelligence [which presumably you don't know nor how many innocent civilians could get killed in the process], until their regime agrees to stop working with the criminals in our government [please elaborate], or until we’ve killed their entire leadership and given their country a very raw deal ["a very raw deal"? whatever that means!] not a blatant violation of the Catholic Just War Doctrine, not to mention international law assuming the latter means anything to you. 

    Offline klasG4e

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2307
    • Reputation: +1344/-235
    • Gender: Male
    Re: US takes out Iranian military leader
    « Reply #85 on: January 05, 2020, 04:46:44 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  •  It [Iran] has to be liberated for real, from these maniacs who took over during Carter’s presidency.  


    Here's a bit of context.  The so called "maniacs" were a long delayed response to the U.S. Government's (via the CIA) overthrow of Iran's democracy in 1953. ( In 2013, the U.S. government formally acknowledged the U.S. role in the coup.)  The dictatorial Shah of Iran (i.e., the official U.S. puppet) took over and held power by brute force in Iran until 1979 (some 26 years!) when he was finally overthrown by the Iranian Revolution.  The innumerable crimes of the Shah against his own people are well docuмented.


    Offline klasG4e

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2307
    • Reputation: +1344/-235
    • Gender: Male
    Re: US takes out Iranian military leader
    « Reply #86 on: January 05, 2020, 05:02:46 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • By the way Soldier of Christ, if Iran αssαssιnαtҽd the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff at the airport in Toronto, Canada for payback in overseeing the U.S. military's violent intervention/occupation in the Middle East would you call that an act of terrorism?

    Offline SoldierOfChrist

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 641
    • Reputation: +423/-31
    • Gender: Male
    Re: US takes out Iranian military leader
    « Reply #87 on: January 05, 2020, 05:30:18 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Which question do you want me to answer?  I’m not going to waste my time working on an honest answer to any of your questions, if I’m going to come back to reply and find a barrage of more questions issued with snark and disrespect.

    Offline Quo vadis Domine

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 4750
    • Reputation: +2897/-667
    • Gender: Male
    Re: US takes out Iranian military leader
    « Reply #88 on: January 05, 2020, 05:47:17 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • President Trump:





    Disclaimer: I am not a fan of Snopes and I find much of there “reporting” to be leftist propaganda.
    Snopes seems to have debunked this Simpson/Trump stuff enough for my satisfaction: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/simpsons-predict-trump/
    For what doth it profit a man, if he gain the whole world, and suffer the loss of his own soul? Or what exchange shall a man give for his soul?

    Offline Banezian

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 477
    • Reputation: +166/-821
    • Gender: Male
    Re: US takes out Iranian military leader
    « Reply #89 on: January 05, 2020, 07:01:54 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • For all the morons defending what Trump did, read this
    https://www.unz.com/pgiraldi/the-soleimani-assassination/

    Israel tried to kill this man a few months ago and failed. They killed him to satisfy the Jews. Trump is a servant of Jewry. 

    Russia and the UN have condemned this
    "For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast."
    Ephesians 2:8-9