Jacob Rothschild and Montgomery Burns:

Episode aired in 1997:

From the Disney-Fox deal to Trump: 4 times 'The Simpsons' predicted the future

Yes, I've seen lists of 15.  This article leaves out the obvious 911 New York magazine cover.  During that episode, they hold the magazine right up to the viewer for an awkwardly long period of time.  It isn't just seen in passing in the background.

Yes, I've seen lists of 15.  This article leaves out the obvious 911 New York magazine cover.  During that episode, they hold the magazine right up to the viewer for an awkwardly long period of time.  It isn't just seen in passing in the background.

.
I've also seen lists compiling predictions of 9/11 in the media, which included that Simpsons example.  Here's one, although it doesn't look like it includes the Simpsons prediction:  


another list:

15 Signs In Popular Culture That ‘Predicted’ The 9/11 Attacks Before They Actually Happened



^This one includes the Simpsons clip.  and this: 

If Trump is part of the Deep State, then apparently the Deep State is in a state of cινιℓ ωαr, and we should all take sides!

Well that's just it, they're NOT in cινιℓ ωαr.....

Let's think about this for a minute. Trump was elected on basically an antiwar platform. Just when Hillary was pining for war every other day, with Russia, with Iran, with Libya, with whomever, Trump was out there promising no more unnecessary foreign entanglements or interventions around the world, especially if it was not beneficial to the U.S. interests. Because of this promise, this made him an automatic target of the deep state (jew state) , the Industrial military complex and the neo-khan zionists lobbies as well as AIPAC. since he's been in office, they have come after him by every means necessary, including now, impeachment. and why? Because, he wouldn't go to war. Trump is on record stating how much money foreign wars since 911 have cost  the U.S, tax payer (trillions) when the money could have been better spent building our infrastructure and manufacturing instead of killing millions of people in wars that didn't concern us.



Now he is engaging in neo-khan rhetoric and action at the behest of their "Israel-first" mentality and pro-war mania. The same as the deep state with their lust for war and anti any nation that puts their own interests ahead of the globalists or God forbid, Israel's. Trump had made no bones about his support for Israel and jews in this country, but I he thought he could pull that off  without sacrificing his agenda of rebuilding America or having an American interests-first mentality. with the jews and Israel, this is not possible. So now, he had to choose as the push against him with the impeachment and the election coming up this year, he had to make a fundamental shift in his foreign policy of keeping us out of useless skirmishes, police actions or unnecessary wars (for Israel nonetheless) and lead us down a path of almost guaranteed, long protracted war, again in the middle east and again with one of Israel's greatest enemies.



So, in my opinion, Trump aligns himself with the "deep state" here, no matter how you slice it or how convoluted that it's some sort of "strategy" to beat them at their own game or play games with the press or trick them in some sort of fashion.


I've been saying from the beginning, Trump is going to have to eventually choose whether he is Israel-first or America-first. and the evidence is clearly seen which way he has chosen. Because at the end of the day both the khanservatives of the right and the deep state left wanted the same thing WAR! And now they will get their pound of flesh.


There is no deep state "cινιℓ ωαr" here. The Donald has chosen.  

Friend, I was saying an ideal situation, not a realistic one.

Not even an ideal situation. Even as a trad Catholic, you don't go to war with a people simply because they are "violent musllims", especially when you come from a nation that is being controlled by violent, anti-goy, bloodthirsty judaics.
I have to give you a pass because you are young. But old enough to reason. You're at a good age to start thinking for yourself.

Randall Terry's 9½ min. assessment is pretty good: