That's right, Trump could be even more of an LGBT Pres than Obama was. The one thing I was hoping against hope for when Obama was first elected was that his Af-Am cultural background would prevent that agenda from moving forward. Boy was I ever wrong!

Quote from: LifeSiteNews

BREAKING: Trump appoints strongly pro-life, pro-marriage Sen. Jeff Sessions as Attorney General

November 18, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) – President-elect Donald Trump has selected strongly pro-life and pro-marriage Alabama Senator Jeff Sessions as his Attorney General.

Two people close to the campaign reported Friday morning that Trump had offered the position to Sessions. Trump's transition team confirmed it in a press release.

“It is an honor to nominate U.S. Senator Jeff Sessions to serve as Attorney General of the United States,” said President-elect Trump. “Jeff has been a highly respected member of the U.S. Senate for 20 years. He is a world-class legal mind and considered a truly great Attorney General and U.S. Attorney in the state of Alabama. Jeff is greatly admired by legal scholars and virtually everyone who knows him.”

"I am humbled to have been asked by President-elect Trump to serve as Attorney General of the United States,” said U.S. Senator Sessions. “My previous 15 years working in the Department of Justice were extraordinarily fulfilling. I love the Department, its people and its mission. I can think of no greater honor than to lead them. With the support of my Senate colleagues, I will give all my strength to advance the Department's highest ideals. I enthusiastically embrace President-elect Trump's vision for ‘one America,’ and his commitment to equal justice under law. I look forward to fulfilling my duties with an unwavering dedication to fairness and impartiality."

In 2006, Sessions voted in favor of a constitutional amendment protecting marriage. He opposed the repeal of the military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy on open ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs serving.

Sessions called the Supreme Court's redefinition of marriage "beyond breathtaking" and warned, “We are at a period of secularization in America that I think is very dangerous, it erodes the very concept of truth, the very concept of right and wrong, and there are people out there who enjoy attacking people who follow biblical directives.”

Sessions has a 100% voting record from National Right to Life. Sessions helped Trump vet his list of potential pro-life Supreme Court nominees.

Following the Center for Medical Progress's videos showing Planned Parenthood trafficking in fetal body parts, Sessions joined with Republican colleagues asking Attorney General Loretta Lynch and the Department of Health and Human Services to investigate the abortion giant.

Let's hope Sessions does something about the "beyond breathtaking" Obergefell v. Hodges.

Supreme Court could be a new justice or two away from overturning gαy ‘marriage’ law: Christian attorney

November 18, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) — Liberty Counsel chairman Mat Staver says that if Donald Trump appoints constitutional originalists like the late Antonin Scalia to the Supreme Court, the 2015 Obergefell v Hodges ruling that forced ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ “marriage” on the states likely will be overturned.

"If you nominate someone to the Supreme Court that has a judicial philosophy, not that they’re political pro-life vs. pro-abortion, but that they’re pro-life in the sense of they know that the Constitution has no basis for abortion,” Staver told WND's Radio America in a November 14 interview. “That means that someone’s viewing the Constitution based upon the written text. They’re not activists.[/i]

"So if you have a person who is a pro-life justice, that’s a person who’s not going to be an activist justice or judge," he said. "If they’re not going to be activists on pro-life, then they’re not going to be activist on the issue of same-sex marriage because that’s even a further deviation from the Constitution beyond belief."

"So if you put someone in there to fill Scalia’s spot, we’re still at … 5-4, right?" said Staver, an attorney who has defended Christian liberty cases before the high court. "So we still have the same terrible decision on marriage. But it’s likely that one more, two more, three more possibilities will come open in the next four years. And all he [Trump] has to do is appoint another Scalia, another Justice Thomas, someone who will respect the Constitution and, therefore, guess what happens? 5-4, 6-3, depending on how many he appoints, the other way.”

Staver continued, “Just give the opportunity to fill those seats with someone who respects the Constitution and this razor-thin 5-4 decision on same-sex marriage, I think, will be in the same trash bin of history that Dred Scott found itself to be in when people began to wake up and have some common sense."

In the 1857 Dred Scott v. Sanford case, the Supreme Court ruled (7-2) ruled that blacks, such as Dred Scott, brought into the United States as slaves could not be U.S. citizens and therefore had no standing to sue in federal court. Dred Scott was effectively overturned by the Civil Rights Act of 1866 and the 14th Amendment, giving black Americans full citizenship.

As LifeSiteNews reported, many social conservatives were troubled by President-elected Trump’s assertion, in a CBS 60 Minutes interview, that the Obergefell decision, unlike Roe v. Wade, was “settled” law.