Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: NishantI'm surprised some people, even Catholics, appear to think Trump'd be a good president.Here's a kindergarten song for you: One of these things is not like the others, one of these things does not belong. One of these things is not like the others. Can you tell which one it is? TRUMP.At least are large number of the populace has the intelligence of a 5 year old. Quote On the other hand some, maybe most, traditional Catholics would say supporting or voting for anyone running is a waste of time. In the U.S. it is. Our election system is a national disaster. In any given year, only a handful of states actually determine the outcome of any election. Since 1990, there are 13 states that have voted Republican every time. Collectively they garner 102 electoral votes. There are 19 states that vote Democrat every time. Collectively they garner 242 electoral votes. If the Republican candidate lost Florida, then the Democrats win.Currently, as population shifts, more states swing in favor of Democrats than Republicans.Unless you are in one of those swing states, it is very unlikely that your Republican vote will count. I live in PA. I don't care how many Republicans go to the polls, this state will still fall blue. The immigrant population in Pittsburgh and Philadelphia and hαɾɾιsburg far out weigh the conservatives living in rural areas. My vote, every year, is simply a vote for opposition.QuoteSo, let's hear it, what are the objections to Senator Rubio winning the nomination? He seems to be a Catholic, conservative senator and is pro-life, faith and family. Sure, we'd all prefer a traditional, Catholic, monarch ruling in the Name of Christ and the Holy Trinity, but since that is not likely any time soon, what are the thoughts of posters here on which candidate, if any, Catholics can support? Senator Rubio is a marginal Catholic. He is definitely a believer in Zionism. All the work that has been done to change the tide regarding abortion has been done by lay people and youtube videos. It has been that fact that has driven local legislators to pass bills to de-fund PP. Rubio, as president, could do very little to change the tide. Besides, the Supreme Court is now the Supreme Lawmaker and Legislator of Evil. The "Change the Supreme Court" ship has long set sail.The United States was founded entirely on Freemasonic and Protestant ideology. Nothing about the U.S is Catholic. Nothing. We have absolutely no good history of Catholicism other than a huge influx if immigrants coming to work in the steel mills and factories of the dawning Industrial Age. We have fought no Crusades. We have never battled against Islam. We have never defended ourselves from heretics. In fact, the United States has touted herself as a haven for all of the above. We had one chance at a Catholic president and that was John F. Kennedy. He openly and proudly declared to the Southern Baptists that he was not going to allow the Church or the Pope to guide his decisions that affected the American people. Did American Catholics jump up and down in the pews about that? Nope. They applauded. American Catholics are really just Catholic Americans. They could really care less about living by Catholic principles. I vote my Catholic principles. I won't vote for a Zionist.I won't vote for a person who supports abortion for any reason.I won't vote for Muslims or Jews. I could vote for a Protestant, but see comment about Zionism.I won't vote for war-mongers.I won't vote for shills for corporations like Big Pharma or Monsanto.These criteria eliminate just about every candidate. Whoever meets these criteria will get my vote. Otherwise, I will just stay home.
I'm surprised some people, even Catholics, appear to think Trump'd be a good president.
On the other hand some, maybe most, traditional Catholics would say supporting or voting for anyone running is a waste of time.
So, let's hear it, what are the objections to Senator Rubio winning the nomination? He seems to be a Catholic, conservative senator and is pro-life, faith and family. Sure, we'd all prefer a traditional, Catholic, monarch ruling in the Name of Christ and the Holy Trinity, but since that is not likely any time soon, what are the thoughts of posters here on which candidate, if any, Catholics can support?
Quote from: ascentEvery single candidate up there is an establishment shill for the perfidious jews - both the Federal Reserve and "Israel". Absolutely correct. Well put.
Every single candidate up there is an establishment shill for the perfidious jews - both the Federal Reserve and "Israel".
Rand Paul appears to meet your criteria.
Quote from: ascentRubio is demonically possessed, but in a "lawful" and organized way, just as the other candidates are, variably, diabolically oriented. If you want thermonuclear WWIII, go ahead, vote for Ru(jew)bio. He will do his very best to rise "Israel" above all nations after all of the radioactive snow has settled. I supported Buchanan in the 90s, and I wrote in his name in 2000. Trump is given (false negative) media attention, but this (controlled opposition) tactic effectively still embeds him into the minds of countless voters as a viable candidate who is "anti-establishment". Trump is a plant and a shill. If you want to know the candidate who was the real threat to the establishment and status quo back in '08 and '12, then look at the man who was completely ignored by the mainstream media. His name is Ron Paul. If the anti-Christ jews did not have ownership over the media, which they used to completely blackball him while shaping the minds of the electorate who can't think for themselves, then they would have αssαssιnαtҽd him, despite the fact the national and gubernatorial (of strategic importance) elections are completely rigged. Too much grassroots support for Ron Paul, and if people were allowed by the media to express their support for him, would have exposed the "elections" as not being real elections at all, but rather a huge show. I supported Ron Paul during both of his runs, but I just can't bring myself to support his son, Rand Paul. There's something about him that I just don't trust.
Rubio is demonically possessed, but in a "lawful" and organized way, just as the other candidates are, variably, diabolically oriented. If you want thermonuclear WWIII, go ahead, vote for Ru(jew)bio. He will do his very best to rise "Israel" above all nations after all of the radioactive snow has settled. I supported Buchanan in the 90s, and I wrote in his name in 2000. Trump is given (false negative) media attention, but this (controlled opposition) tactic effectively still embeds him into the minds of countless voters as a viable candidate who is "anti-establishment". Trump is a plant and a shill. If you want to know the candidate who was the real threat to the establishment and status quo back in '08 and '12, then look at the man who was completely ignored by the mainstream media. His name is Ron Paul. If the anti-Christ jews did not have ownership over the media, which they used to completely blackball him while shaping the minds of the electorate who can't think for themselves, then they would have αssαssιnαtҽd him, despite the fact the national and gubernatorial (of strategic importance) elections are completely rigged. Too much grassroots support for Ron Paul, and if people were allowed by the media to express their support for him, would have exposed the "elections" as not being real elections at all, but rather a huge show.
Are there are any other candidates besides Rand Paul who are NOT in Israel's pocket? (Can't say Trump because I don't think he is on any side of this issue.)
Quote from: CathMomof7Quote from: NishantI'm surprised some people, even Catholics, appear to think Trump'd be a good president.Here's a kindergarten song for you: One of these things is not like the others, one of these things does not belong. One of these things is not like the others. Can you tell which one it is? TRUMP.At least are large number of the populace has the intelligence of a 5 year old. Quote On the other hand some, maybe most, traditional Catholics would say supporting or voting for anyone running is a waste of time. In the U.S. it is. Our election system is a national disaster. In any given year, only a handful of states actually determine the outcome of any election. Since 1990, there are 13 states that have voted Republican every time. Collectively they garner 102 electoral votes. There are 19 states that vote Democrat every time. Collectively they garner 242 electoral votes. If the Republican candidate lost Florida, then the Democrats win.Currently, as population shifts, more states swing in favor of Democrats than Republicans.Unless you are in one of those swing states, it is very unlikely that your Republican vote will count. I live in PA. I don't care how many Republicans go to the polls, this state will still fall blue. The immigrant population in Pittsburgh and Philadelphia and hαɾɾιsburg far out weigh the conservatives living in rural areas. My vote, every year, is simply a vote for opposition.QuoteSo, let's hear it, what are the objections to Senator Rubio winning the nomination? He seems to be a Catholic, conservative senator and is pro-life, faith and family. Sure, we'd all prefer a traditional, Catholic, monarch ruling in the Name of Christ and the Holy Trinity, but since that is not likely any time soon, what are the thoughts of posters here on which candidate, if any, Catholics can support? Senator Rubio is a marginal Catholic. He is definitely a believer in Zionism. All the work that has been done to change the tide regarding abortion has been done by lay people and youtube videos. It has been that fact that has driven local legislators to pass bills to de-fund PP. Rubio, as president, could do very little to change the tide. Besides, the Supreme Court is now the Supreme Lawmaker and Legislator of Evil. The "Change the Supreme Court" ship has long set sail.The United States was founded entirely on Freemasonic and Protestant ideology. Nothing about the U.S is Catholic. Nothing. We have absolutely no good history of Catholicism other than a huge influx if immigrants coming to work in the steel mills and factories of the dawning Industrial Age. We have fought no Crusades. We have never battled against Islam. We have never defended ourselves from heretics. In fact, the United States has touted herself as a haven for all of the above. We had one chance at a Catholic president and that was John F. Kennedy. He openly and proudly declared to the Southern Baptists that he was not going to allow the Church or the Pope to guide his decisions that affected the American people. Did American Catholics jump up and down in the pews about that? Nope. They applauded. American Catholics are really just Catholic Americans. They could really care less about living by Catholic principles. I vote my Catholic principles. I won't vote for a Zionist.I won't vote for a person who supports abortion for any reason.I won't vote for Muslims or Jews. I could vote for a Protestant, but see comment about Zionism.I won't vote for war-mongers.I won't vote for shills for corporations like Big Pharma or Monsanto.These criteria eliminate just about every candidate. Whoever meets these criteria will get my vote. Otherwise, I will just stay home.Rand Paul appears to meet your criteria.