Author Topic: Trump snubs Fox debate to meet his masters (Read 3523 times)

Incredulous · « **on:** March 16, 2016, 07:15:21 PM »

Video in link with Trump's admission that the Amerian Israel Public Affairs Committee is a more important audience.

DONALD TRUMP WILL SKIP UPCOMING FOX DEBATE FOR ‘MAJOR SPEECH’ BEFORE AIPAC

Trumps goes before AIPAC

SOURCE: WASHINGTON POST

Donald Trump said Wednesday morning that he will skip next week’s Republican presidential debate because he already has plans to deliver a “very major speech.”

“I’m making a very major speech in front of a very important group of people,” he said on “Fox & Friends,” later confirming that the remarks will be delivered before the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). Trump said his speech at the powerful lobbying group’s conference in Washington “was scheduled a while ago.”

All presidential candidates of both parties were invited to speak at the multi-day conference, though so far only the only other contender on AIPAC’s list of speakers is Democrat Hillary Clinton.

Fox News on Monday announced that it would host a GOP debate on March 21 in Salt Lake City. It will be the 13th Republican debate of this election cycle; at the first, in August, Fox News anchor Megyn Kelly opened by questioning Trump about disparaging remarks he has made about women — sparking a feud that has simmered for seven months.

In January, Trump skipped a Fox debate in Des Moines, an act he later said may have contributed to his second-place finish in Iowa’s first-in-the-nation caucuses.

“I think some people were disappointed that I didn’t go,” Trump said in early February.

He participated in a debate earlier this month in Detroit and avoided any confrontations with Kelly, though he has continued to disparage her since then.

RomanCatholic1953 · « **Reply #1 on:** March 16, 2016, 07:46:41 PM »

Since Trump would not go to this debate setup by the Mormons in Salt
Lake City. The event was canceled. It was a designed to be a trap for
Trump. Especially Megyn Kelly was going to be there.
It will be interesting what Trump will say at the AIPC Conference.
He did say to a group of Jєωιѕн Republicans that he will not accept
their pack money. All other Republic Candidates received lots of pack
money from Jєωιѕн Donors. So far, Trump is using his own fortune.
Trump has offended the Jєωs so much, he may not be allowed to
speak, and his appearance may be canceled.
I hope Trump gets the message.

Prayerful · « **Reply #2 on:** March 16, 2016, 08:09:41 PM »

An audience of big donors angry their money for little Marco or Lyin' Ted is wasted with every little clip and question focussed on making Mr Trump look stupid, is something he was wise to miss. If he had some golf, like Obama, or was washing his hair, or anything, it would be better than that trap of a debate. Let's see what he says to AIPAC. He voiced a more guarded or balanced position on the Israel-Palestine situation, as far I as could tell (might be wrong) but the others seemed all about fighting for Israel to the last American while Mr Trump said he would talk to both side, make a deal.

MaterDominici · « **Reply #3 on:** March 17, 2016, 11:28:24 AM »

Quote from: RomanCatholic1953

It will be interesting what Trump will say at the AIPC Conference.
He did say to a group of Jєωιѕн Republicans that he will not accept
their pack money. All other Republic Candidates received lots of pack
money from Jєωιѕн Donors. So far, Trump is using his own fortune.

I've asked this question before, but it got buried.

Should large personal wealth be a pre-requisite to running for POTUS? If not, how do you envision an honest person raising the nearly $1 billion typically spent on a presidential campaign?

PfT mentioned lack of funds being a real issue for Ron Paul's campaign.

Is there a solution to this paradox?

Quote from: Prayerful

He voiced a more guarded or balanced position on the Israel-Palestine situation, as far I as could tell (might be wrong) but the others seemed all about fighting for Israel to the last American while Mr Trump said he would talk to both side, make a deal.

He describes himself as being very pro-Israel, but wanting to appear neutral to the other side of the negotiating table. (... becuase the Palestinian leaders of course don't have access to the same YouTube clip I just watched.)

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/embed/KKTJp8I8CaE[/youtube]

Prayerful · « **Reply #4 on:** March 17, 2016, 11:42:06 AM »

Being booed at a debate means little enough as they were mostly an audience of RNC flunkies and donors raging that the men they backed were busted flushes. Wait and see what he says to AIPAC. He might give the usual blood and thunder fight for Israel to the last American, but he might risk booing by trying to be balanced.

parentsfortruth · « **Reply #5 on:** March 17, 2016, 12:48:05 PM »

Incredulous,

This was my knee-jerk reaction when I heard he was going to talk to them. I'm waiting to see what he says to them. "Many Jєωs" are upset that a "racist" like him was even invited. He says he's not beholden to special interests. Let's see if he means it.

Cera · « **Reply #6 on:** March 17, 2016, 04:01:42 PM »

A candidate who has had numerous death threats, and who has tptb flying into a private island to plan how to stop him, and who has had violent protesters try to rush the stage, and who had four secret service agents circle him in order to protect him, and who has had protesters with tomatoes close to his podium, and who has had violent protesters threaten those who support him -- can cancel any d--m event he wants to cancel with no questions asked.

MaterDominici · « **Reply #7 on:** March 17, 2016, 04:17:24 PM »

Quote from: Cera

who has had violent protesters try to rush the stage, and who had four secret service agents circle him in order to protect him,

He struck me as more dumb than violent.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/13/politics/thomas-dimassimo-donald-trump-protester-interview/index.html

rum · « **Reply #8 on:** March 17, 2016, 05:50:18 PM »

Quote from: Incredulous

Trump's admission that the Amerian Israel Public Affairs Committee is a more important audience.

He said the same about the speech he gave to raise funds for veterans when skipping another Fox debate earlier in the primary.

I don't have a problem with people being against Trump because he's submissive to Jєωs. How is this newsworthy, to be posting constantly about it? You seem to think you have some deep insight lost on the rest of us. Does anyone on CathInfo think that any politician elected to the highest office in a Western nation couldn't be submissive to Jєωs? I thought that was common knowledge here. Why would anyone be surprised that he's going to address AIPAC? It's clear that Trump is detested within certain factions of Jєωry, especially neoconservative and neoliberal Jєωry, but other factions must like him, otherwise he probably would have been destroyed by now.

I get the sense that some are against him because he wounded their vanity or because they're nonwhite. Are Incredulous and Mark79 nonwhite? I think of those two in tandem. I remember Mark79/Diego posting a laughable piece from American Mercury on ABLF 1.0 that was sympathetic of Martin Luther King. Incredulous pops up on this thread and shares some warm and fuzzies with two revolting race worshipping trolls who did their best to destroy the thread.

PG · « **Reply #9 on:** March 17, 2016, 06:15:59 PM »

I don't think aipac is going to boo trump. And, I do not think trump is going to bow down to them. Trump is either going to talk circles around them, or he is going to walk the tightrope. Perhaps he will do a bit of both. I has shown himself able.

Incredulous · « **Reply #10 on:** March 18, 2016, 07:27:03 PM »

Quote from: rum

Quote from: Incredulous
Trump's admission that the Amerian Israel Public Affairs Committee is a more important audience.

He said the same about the speech he gave to raise funds for veterans when skipping another Fox debate earlier in the primary.

I don't have a problem with people being against Trump because he's submissive to Jєωs. How is this newsworthy, to be posting constantly about it? You seem to think you have some deep insight lost on the rest of us.

Yes, I think most of the American voters fit the тαℓмυdic definition of the "dumb goyim".
How else could the Jєωs infiltrate the Catholic Church and take over our government?

Does anyone on CathInfo think that any politician elected to the highest office in a Western nation couldn't be submissive to Jєωs? I thought that was common knowledge here. Why would anyone be surprised that he's going to address AIPAC? It's clear that Trump is detested within certain factions of Jєωry, especially neoconservative and neoliberal Jєωry, but other factions must like him, otherwise he probably would have been destroyed by now.

No, I don't think most of Cathinfo's members know or believe our leaders are tools of the Jєωs.
Most of the members haven't read Father's Denis Fahey's works explaining how the Jєωs have murdered our natural leaders. They don't get that point.

They still watch TV and are seduced into the Jєω fantasy, that Trump will make American great again.
They lack grace and believe this, even after the Jєωs have killed multiple generations of Americans in foreign wars, through legalized abortion, and through their Jєω-mafia controlled drug operations. And there are many other Jєω-schemes they are completely unaware of.

I get the sense that some are against him because he wounded their vanity or because they're nonwhite. Are Incredulous and Mark79 nonwhite? I think of those two in tandem. I remember Mark79/Diego posting a laughable piece from American Mercury on ABLF 1.0 that was sympathetic of Martin Luther King. Incredulous pops up on this thread and shares some warm and fuzzies with two revolting race worshipping trolls who did their best to destroy the thread.

I think Mark79 is a whitey. I "check-the-box" under the category of a Pacific Islander.

No, my vanity is pretty strong, but I'm against him because he's a ʝʊdɛօ-masonic liar, a friend of zionist Israel, and everyhing he stands for is against Our Lord Jesus Christ and our Holy religion.

Please, give some more of your slow-pitch, softball questions. I like em. :smile:

MaterDominici · « **Reply #11 on:** March 21, 2016, 12:54:19 AM »

Sounds like this should prove to be interesting.

Trump plans AIPAC surprise

By ELI STOKOLS 03/20/16 03:52 PM EDT

Over the nine months of his presidential campaign, Donald Trump has yet to step to a podium and read from a script. That changes Monday, when he is set to address more than 18,000 people attending the annual American Israel Public Affairs Committee conference in Washington.

He’s also looking to surprise the crowd with something else: substance.

“He has taken input from a number of very significant Jєωιѕн influences who have reaffirmed to him the importance of this particular speech,” according to a source close to Trump’s campaign. “He is taking it very seriously.”

As he closes in on the Republican nomination, the unconventional and controversial candidate is taking steps to address concerns about his seriousness and whether he has the policy chops and intellectual curiosity to be commander in chief.

The anti-establishment firebrand is spending the entire day in Washington, D.C. on Monday. He’ll meet with two-dozen influential Republican lawmakers and lobbyists and hold a press conference ahead of his speech to AIPAC that evening. The speech, prepared over the last week and finalized last week, will “outline his depth of knowledge about the U.S.-Israel relationship and his 30 years of supporting Israeli causes,” the source continued.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/03/trump-aipac-israel-protests-221002

Incredulous · « **Reply #12 on:** March 21, 2016, 01:47:40 AM »

Yes, very interesting. A ʝʊdɛօ-masonic, real-estate billionaire, publicly selling himself to America's Jєωιѕн power brokers.

His speech won't be the same old "goy BS", but, rather it will have substance.

That "substance" can be nothing more than selling Americans "down the river" to satisfy zionist interests.

Incredulous · « **Reply #13 on:** March 21, 2016, 02:44:20 AM »

Graham · « **Reply #14 on:** March 21, 2016, 05:12:01 AM »

It doesn't matter what he says to them, because he's so immoral that we can't believe anything he says. If he expresses support for Israel we have no way to know if he means it. He could easily mean the opposite and just be saying what they want to hear.

... is what some people should be saying if they're self-consistent.

I'm not expecting a great speech here but it will be better than what Cruz would say in his place. Cruz would grovel and simper the whole time and we all know it. With Trump there's at least a possibility of some halfway decent statements.