Yeah, but - he's gonna make America great again!!!!!  
Rush Limbaugh can explain it all.






[N.B. The above is what is know as sarcasm or irony.  I would hope it's obvious.]

Yes. And these quotes, all assembled here by Romney, have not been put into context. The video doesn't tell us that these quotes are Trump's reactions to vile attacks by feminαzιs, and lesbians, and others. If you take a stick and poke it at a lion, don't be surprised if he smacks you! All these feminαzιs acted liked brats, and they got what their parents should have done when they grew up: A good spanking!

Can you tell me which ones you think were taken out of context? It's simple enough to look them up.

Here's is the section of the Rolling Stone article which talks about Fiorina.

With his blue tie loosened and slung over his shoulder, Trump sits back to digest his meal and provide a running byplay to the news. Onscreen, they've cut away to a spot with Scott Walker, the creaky-robot governor of Wisconsin. Praised by the anchor for his "slow but steady" style, Walker is about to respond when Trump chimes in, "Yeah, he's slow, all right! That's what we got already: slowwww." His staffers at the conference table howl and hoot; their man, though, is just getting warm. When the anchor throws to Carly Fiorina for her reaction to Trump's momentum, Trump's expression sours in schoolboy disgust as the camera bores in on Fiorina. "Look at that face!" he cries. "Would anyone vote for that? Can you imagine that, the face of our next president?!" The laughter grows halting and faint behind him. "I mean, she's a woman, and I'm not s'posedta say bad things, but really, folks, come on. Are we serious?"  

And there, in a nutshell, is Trump's blessing and his curse: He can't seem to quit while he's ahead. The instincts that carried him out to a lead and have kept him far above the captious field are the same ones that landed him in ugly stews with ex-wives, business partners, networks, supermodels and many, many other famous women. At 69, he can still carry on like the teen who was yanked out of prep school and delivered to Col. Dobias, the take-no-shit instructor at the military academy. After I met Ivanka and praised her to her father, he said, "Yeah, she's really something, and what a beauty, that one. If I weren't happily married and, ya know, her father . . . "

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/trump-seriously-20150909#ixzz432wULNQm

Fact of the matter is, if he calls so and so a fat, ugly heffer, this has no bearing on whether or not he will do a good job as president. Who cares?

So he talked about fat, nasty, griping, bitching women. Give me a break.

This is why women shouldn't be involved in politics. Basically, you oppose Trump because he talked about fat ladies that have no respect for even themselves. This is the problem. Most American women from my generation are so obsessed with the world and have no respect for themseleves. Women have disrespected themselves much more then Trump ever could...(not generalize, but my statement is generally true).

I support him because he wants to enforce the law of our borders for the common good of millions. He wants to defend our country, fight Isis, and keep unregulated Muslim immigrants from coming leading to an eventual Sharia Law in the next century.

In this case, the common good of  millions (possibly billions) TRUMPS the feelings of a few obese ladies.

So he talked about fat, nasty, griping, bitching women. Give me a break.

You've lumped together Megyn Kelly, Carly Fiorina, Princess Diana, the Apprentice contestant, and many others, broadly calling them all "fat, nastry, griping, bitching women". If that was really your intention, I can see why Trump appeals to you.

This is why women shouldn't be involved in politics. Basically, you oppose Trump because he talked about fat ladies that have no respect for even themselves. This is the problem. Most American women from my generation are so obsessed with the world and have no respect for themseleves. Women have disrespected themselves much more then Trump ever could...(not generalize, but my statement is generally true).

I've mentioned numerous reasons why I wouldn't vote for Trump. I can list them for you again if you'd like.

I support him because he wants to enforce the law of our borders for the common good of millions. He wants to defend our country, fight Isis, and keep unregulated Muslim immigrants from coming leading to an eventual Sharia Law in the next century.

None of these positions are unique to Trump.

Like it or not, the fact is women vote more than men and you certainly won't hear these sort of remarks out of Hillary's mouth.

Now there's a mouth full... from your own words, one could conclude this Nation is in absolute decay. It is now a matriarchal society rather than a patriarchal society.  I'm unaware of a such said society to ever recover from this form of perversion.

Men have abandoned their natural roles of governance. They have placed themselves at the same level as those roles of a woman, or vice versa.  Priests of today have subjected themselves to the same error by placeing themselves equal to the faithful.

What does St. Paul say...

11. Let the woman learn in silence, with all subjection. 12. But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to use authority over the man: but to be in silence. 13. For Adam was first formed; then Eve. 14. And Adam was not seduced; but the woman being seduced, was in the transgression. 15. Yet she shall be saved through childbearing; if she continue in faith, and love, and sanctification, with sobriety.  (I Timothy II)

If I'm forced to make a choice here, I would choose a brute closer to the Natural Order over one of an effeminate and perverse nature.