Catholic Info
Traditional Catholic Faith => Politics and World Leaders => Topic started by: Matthew on March 15, 2016, 04:21:07 PM
-
A short 1-minute video -- everyone needs to see this.
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/embed/OkSRJSUY0vs[/youtube]
-
Yeah, but - he's gonna make America great again!!!!!
Rush Limbaugh can explain it all.
[N.B. The above is what is know as sarcasm or irony. I would hope it's obvious.]
-
You know, "she'll take care of the kids" isn't so bad. That just goes to show that this ad was made by liberals with leftists, feminists views. It's a bit unfair to show only his immoral views and not the immoral views of the people who made the video, unless of course, you agree with them.
Anyways, I don't care if he disrespected some angry feminists because he said she was on the rag. The president's job isn't going to be to cater to feminists, like some of you believe. He can be a S.O.B. for all I care, but if he does a good job of keeping the country from going down the drain, then that's all I care about. I don't care if he said such and such was a fat heffer. Only liberals and feminists care about this. "I don't want him to be president because he called her fat and ugly" pfff. Give me a break. At the end of the day, it's not his views on fat ladies that will destroy the Nation.
-
Yes. And these quotes, all assembled here by Romney, have not been put into context. The video doesn't tell us that these quotes are Trump's reactions to vile attacks by feminαzιs, and lesbians, and others. If you take a stick and poke it at a lion, don't be surprised if he smacks you! All these feminαzιs acted liked brats, and they got what their parents should have done when they grew up: A good spanking!
Can you tell me which ones you think were taken out of context? It's simple enough to look them up.
-
Here's the full clip of the "blood" comment:
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/embed/M28z9y4yT6Y[/youtube]
-
Here's is the section of the Rolling Stone article which talks about Fiorina.
With his blue tie loosened and slung over his shoulder, Trump sits back to digest his meal and provide a running byplay to the news. Onscreen, they've cut away to a spot with Scott Walker, the creaky-robot governor of Wisconsin. Praised by the anchor for his "slow but steady" style, Walker is about to respond when Trump chimes in, "Yeah, he's slow, all right! That's what we got already: slowwww." His staffers at the conference table howl and hoot; their man, though, is just getting warm. When the anchor throws to Carly Fiorina for her reaction to Trump's momentum, Trump's expression sours in schoolboy disgust as the camera bores in on Fiorina. "Look at that face!" he cries. "Would anyone vote for that? Can you imagine that, the face of our next president?!" The laughter grows halting and faint behind him. "I mean, she's a woman, and I'm not s'posedta say bad things, but really, folks, come on. Are we serious?"
And there, in a nutshell, is Trump's blessing and his curse: He can't seem to quit while he's ahead. The instincts that carried him out to a lead and have kept him far above the captious field are the same ones that landed him in ugly stews with ex-wives, business partners, networks, supermodels and many, many other famous women. At 69, he can still carry on like the teen who was yanked out of prep school and delivered to Col. Dobias, the take-no-shit instructor at the military academy. After I met Ivanka and praised her to her father, he said, "Yeah, she's really something, and what a beauty, that one. If I weren't happily married and, ya know, her father . . . "
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/trump-seriously-20150909#ixzz432wULNQm
-
Here is "it must be a pretty picture, you dropping to your knees".
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/embed/urReg9O6MwA[/youtube]
-
Fact of the matter is, if he calls so and so a fat, ugly heffer, this has no bearing on whether or not he will do a good job as president. Who cares?
-
Like it or not, the fact is women vote more than men and you certainly won't hear these sort of remarks out of Hillary's mouth.
I'd rather lose votes to the Dem side for cutting PP funding or taking away the free birth control than for lacking basic decency toward women.
The most unfortunate thing is that he's occasionally correct and those statements get buried in piles of remarks about him wallowing in sin against the 6th and 9th. Here's an example of where he takes a perfectly good opinion and mires it by promoting first greed and then divorce.
“For a man to be successful he needs support at home, just like my father had from my mother, not someone who is always griping and bitching. When a man has to endure a woman who is not supportive and complains constantly about his not being home enough or not being attentive enough, he will not be very successful unless he is unable to cut the cord.” (The Art of the Comeback, Donald Trump with Kate Bohner, 1997)
-
So he talked about fat, nasty, griping, bitching women. Give me a break.
This is why women shouldn't be involved in politics. Basically, you oppose Trump because he talked about fat ladies that have no respect for even themselves. This is the problem. Most American women from my generation are so obsessed with the world and have no respect for themseleves. Women have disrespected themselves much more then Trump ever could...(not generalize, but my statement is generally true).
I support him because he wants to enforce the law of our borders for the common good of millions. He wants to defend our country, fight Isis, and keep unregulated Muslim immigrants from coming leading to an eventual Sharia Law in the next century.
In this case, the common good of millions (possibly billions) TRUMPS the feelings of a few obese ladies.
-
I think he is as crooked as anyone, but Hilary is still worse.
Trump saying those crude remarks is nothing compared to what most of us hear daily from co-workers, yet I bet those same people could do a better job of being president than Obama if that were the case.
I hate he thought of it coming down to Hilary or Trump - and I think Hilary will win, which is sickening to me, but neither is going to make any lasting difference for the better.
Remember to never underestimate the stupidity of Americans, after all, they voted in Obama twice - with that mentality being prevalent, Hilary is a shoe in over nasty old bigot Trump.
-
So he talked about fat, nasty, griping, bitching women. Give me a break.
You've lumped together Megyn Kelly, Carly Fiorina, Princess Diana, the Apprentice contestant, and many others, broadly calling them all "fat, nastry, griping, bitching women". If that was really your intention, I can see why Trump appeals to you.
This is why women shouldn't be involved in politics. Basically, you oppose Trump because he talked about fat ladies that have no respect for even themselves. This is the problem. Most American women from my generation are so obsessed with the world and have no respect for themseleves. Women have disrespected themselves much more then Trump ever could...(not generalize, but my statement is generally true).
I've mentioned numerous reasons why I wouldn't vote for Trump. I can list them for you again if you'd like.
I support him because he wants to enforce the law of our borders for the common good of millions. He wants to defend our country, fight Isis, and keep unregulated Muslim immigrants from coming leading to an eventual Sharia Law in the next century.
None of these positions are unique to Trump.
-
Just so you know, in my home we don't have a TV. The only person on that list that I know who she is is Princess Diana. Your wide knowledge of female celebrities tells it all. I would seriously have to look up the name of that one lady he called fat that most people don't like anyways. I have no idea about American pop culture or entertainment, unlike yourself, apparently...
-
Like it or not, the fact is women vote more than men and you certainly won't hear these sort of remarks out of Hillary's mouth.
Now there's a mouth full... from your own words, one could conclude this Nation is in absolute decay. It is now a matriarchal society rather than a patriarchal society. I'm unaware of a such said society to ever recover from this form of perversion.
Men have abandoned their natural roles of governance. They have placed themselves at the same level as those roles of a woman, or vice versa. Priests of today have subjected themselves to the same error by placeing themselves equal to the faithful.
What does St. Paul say...
11. Let the woman learn in silence, with all subjection. 12. But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to use authority over the man: but to be in silence. 13. For Adam was first formed; then Eve. 14. And Adam was not seduced; but the woman being seduced, was in the transgression. 15. Yet she shall be saved through childbearing; if she continue in faith, and love, and sanctification, with sobriety. (I Timothy II)
If I'm forced to make a choice here, I would choose a brute closer to the Natural Order over one of an effeminate and perverse nature.
-
Just so you know, in my home we don't have a TV. The only person on that list that I know who she is is Princess Diana. Your wide knowledge of female celebrities tells it all. I would seriously have to look up the name of that one lady he called fat that most people don't like anyways. I have no idea about American pop culture or entertainment, unlike yourself, apparently...
I don't own a TV either, but both of us clearly have internet access. I watch debate clips on youtube except for 2 debates that I watched at a relative's house. I hope to go again for the next one as Trump has again promised not to be there.
Carly Fiorina was a presidential candidate. Pretty common knowledge for anyone watching the debates. Megyn Kelly was the debate moderator. I have no idea who the Apprentice lady is as I've never seen the show, but I searched for the quote and the clip came right up. The most popular fat person comment (which was discussed at the same debate) was directed at O'Donelle, the talk show host you've mentioned previously, so I don't know who it is that you're thinking of now.
-
Like it or not, the fact is women vote more than men and you certainly won't hear these sort of remarks out of Hillary's mouth.
Now there's a mouth full... from your own words, one could conclude this Nation is in absolute decay. It is now a matriarchal society rather than a patriarchal society. I'm unaware of a such said society to ever recover from this form of perversion.
Men have abandoned their natural roles of governance. They have placed themselves at the same level as those roles of a woman, or vice versa. Priests of today have subjected themselves to the same error by placeing themselves equal to the faithful.
What does St. Paul say...
11. Let the woman learn in silence, with all subjection. 12. But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to use authority over the man: but to be in silence. 13. For Adam was first formed; then Eve. 14. And Adam was not seduced; but the woman being seduced, was in the transgression. 15. Yet she shall be saved through childbearing; if she continue in faith, and love, and sanctification, with sobriety. (I Timothy II)
If I'm forced to make a choice here, I would choose a brute closer to the Natural Order over one of an effeminate and perverse nature.
I kind of see it as every married man getting 2 votes instead of one. :smirk:
-
Limbaugh couldn't be more wrong. Trump's well docuмented pagan and worldly lifestyle is certainly relevant to his presidential aspirations. In Trump you have an openly unrepentant serial adulterer, boorish in the extreme, who demonstrates in every way that he is a worlding through and through. Trump knows nonetheless he cannot win the nomination without support from Christians and conservatives. He plays them for a fool, not even bothering to put some effort into his deception - as he openly said he has not asked God for forgiveness in his life and could not cite a single verse of the Bible when asked.
http://patriotpost.us/opinion/40963
"As a frequent guest on The Howard Stern show for many years, Trump repeatedly and consistently spewed pornographic sleaze and advocated a sɛҳuąƖly immoral lifestyle, while proudly living one himself. Many of them can be heard through links on BuzzFeed.com, which broke the most comprehensive story on Trump’s Stern interviews to date. What you will discover is that Trump often rated women on a scale of 1 to 10 according to their looks. He said, for instance, that "[a] person who is very flat-chested is very hard to be a 10.“ He also repeatedly talked about how he could "do” famous women if he chose to, used crude language to describe females, and played the International Playboy role to perfection. Listen to the audio and prepare to be sickened.
Recall when Mr. Trump said that Megyn Kelly of Fox News had “blood coming out of her wherever.” Reflect on his attacking former presidential candidate Carly Fiornia with an insult about her face. Think about how creepy and inappropriate is Trump’s declaration that he would date his own daughter if she weren’t his daughter. Remember his very public adulterous affair with Marla Maples while he was still married to his first wife. The list goes on and on.
But back to the idea of making money off of strippers. Mr. Trump’s current (and third) wife, the would-be First Lady, has her own record in pornography. In fact, she posed nude in her years as a model. That’s right — if the GOP continues down this path of madness we will have a presidential nominee who degrades women, has bragged about his adultery, has made money off of strip tease shows, and a First Lady who has posed totally nude.
It’s no wonder that Donald Trump still supports and extols the virtues of Planned Parenthood, the organization that betrays women and girls at the most vulnerable time in their lives; the organization that encourages our teen daughters to be sɛҳuąƖly active; the organization that is now notorious for selling baby body parts. It is the very philosophy of Planned Parenthood that Donald Trump uses to justify his decadent lifestyle choices."
-
Like it or not, the fact is women vote more than men and you certainly won't hear these sort of remarks out of Hillary's mouth.
Now there's a mouth full... from your own words, one could conclude this Nation is in absolute decay. It is now a matriarchal society rather than a patriarchal society. I'm unaware of a such said society to ever recover from this form of perversion.
Men have abandoned their natural roles of governance. They have placed themselves at the same level as those roles of a woman, or vice versa. Priests of today have subjected themselves to the same error by placeing themselves equal to the faithful.
What does St. Paul say...
11. Let the woman learn in silence, with all subjection. 12. But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to use authority over the man: but to be in silence. 13. For Adam was first formed; then Eve. 14. And Adam was not seduced; but the woman being seduced, was in the transgression. 15. Yet she shall be saved through childbearing; if she continue in faith, and love, and sanctification, with sobriety. (I Timothy II)
If I'm forced to make a choice here, I would choose a brute closer to the Natural Order over one of an effeminate and perverse nature.
I kind of see it as every married man getting 2 votes instead of one. :smirk:
Don't fool yourself. Women have been wearing pants for a long time now. This is part of the problem.
Anyways, if the women vote more than the men, then it can't be a married man getting two votes.
-
In a way it's bad that anyone can vote, including men. But I'd rather women not be allowed to vote. Has there ever been a good society that wasn't monarchical? We have to do the best with what we have, or just stay out of the process altogether. I might vote for Trump in the New York primaries. I haven't registered though so it may be too late.
Trump called Rosie O'Donnell fat after she attacked him on her show, making fun of his hair and saying he had a comb-over. He attacked Megyn Kelly after she insinuated that he hated an entire gender, as if that's even possible. People who conflate criticism of individual members of "victim groups" to all members are always Judaized.
As far as Trump being beholden to Masonic and Jєωιѕн interests (or possibly being a mason or Jew), what of it? The open society was created by ʝʊdɛօ-Masonry, so it's well nigh impossible for an untainted politician to get into the Oval Office. Catholics are on the wrong side of history, for the time being. If Trump were to follow through on only some of his promises he'd still be vastly superior to the alternatives. Even if he doesn't follow through on one promise it's hard to see how he'd be worse than the other candidates. At the very least he makes for great political theater. Thus far his run has been fascinating to watch and I absolutely love the way he destroys the usual Leftist smear tactics that are effective against practically all Republicans. Such as when Hillary Clinton accused him of sexism and he counter-punched by calling her out as basically an accomplice to a serial rapist. Shut her up immediately.
-
Yes. I agree. None of this would happen if women would not have degraded themselves in the first place. No woman is being forced to model, to strip, to dress as a w...e, to pose nude, to go on tv shows, to go into politics, to go to Hollywood, and so forth and so on. They do it because they are motivated by their thirst for attention, fame, money. They are the ones playing on men's weaknesses.
Unfortunately women reflect the Virtue of man, or the lack of, proportionatly to the relationship of man to God. As Bp Williamson has stated numerous times, raise boys to be men and women will follow. We still see for the most part the fashions of today, especially of those of women, are designed by males. I refuse to call them men in this sense. Manliness is a Virtue.
So in short, we men are to blame.
-
In a way it's bad that anyone can vote, including men. But I'd rather women not be allowed to vote. Has there ever been a good society that wasn't monarchical?.
It would be ideal, IMO, if we could have the structure that the Swiss had up to not too long ago. Only men, who had to be property owners, could vote. And I believe that this is the most important thing, the votes were public, no secret ballots. Man is more apt to apply his wickedness in private, rather than if it is before men.
Off the top of my head, Garcia Moreno, Franco and Salazar. These were more or less Republics.
I prefer monarchy, it's the structure of government of the Church.
-
Unfortunately women reflect the Virtue of man, or the lack of, proportionatly to the relationship of man to God.
Well, it is nearly impossible to raise a child properly/or discipline a spouse when our ʝʊdɛօ-Masonic society is so hell bent at twisting them 24/7.
You have everything against you: school system, mass media, penal and civil laws, and the influence of your neighbours themselves.
We still see for the most part the fashions of today, especially of those of women, are designed by males.
By sodomites and jews.
(...)
So in short, we men are to blame.
Why all of a sudden the collective guilt friend?
Is it Man's fault, individually or otherwise, being unable, or even unwilling, to artificially (in the sense of actively) correcting the natural condition of some thing?
I guess about as much as your cattle being killed by wild hyenas, because you did not tame them since birth.
-
Anyways, if the women vote more than the men, then it can't be a married man getting two votes.
Yes, of course. It was said in jest.
The out of wedlock birth rate in this country shows just how few women are concerned with marriage.
-
I think modern man is deeply disappointed, not to say frustrated, by modern women. By nature, men look towards women as an ideal of purity and selflessness. They want women to motivate them to become better men. They deeply want to be chivalrous and to have women give them a purpose in life other than simply make money. They want to dedicate their time and efforts to protect and provide. Yes, men, because of original sin, have this great weakness in them. They don't like it. They don't like that animal part in them. They look up to women to elevate them. Yet, what do they find nowadays? They see women who do not understand this. Women who want to be "equal". Women who unashamadly use their physical advantages to play on their weaknesses in order to enslave them. They feel women are throwing them relentlessly into the mud pond, and are walking all over them. Should we really be surprised, at the end of the day, if some men express their frustration and their wounds with insults and bad language?
Well said, Patricius.
Surprised? No.
But should we encourage them and all men toward something better? Absolutely.
-
Ok, so I admit that Trump has publicly done some repulsive things regarding women. He is far from being any model of sanctity or a role model. I won't deny this or defend him on that.
I admit that I don't know much about his public/personal life...
Let's just admit that most people are in favor of a Trump presidency because they see him as someone who is not bought or picked by the media and others who wish to control American politics.
-
Yes. I agree. None of this would happen if women would not have degraded themselves in the first place. No woman is being forced to model, to strip, to dress as a w...e, to pose nude, to go on tv shows, to go into politics, to go to Hollywood, and so forth and so on. They do it because they are motivated by their thirst for attention, fame, money. They are the ones playing on men's weaknesses.
Unfortunately women reflect the Virtue of man, or the lack of, proportionatly to the relationship of man to God. As Bp Williamson has stated numerous times, raise boys to be men and women will follow. We still see for the most part the fashions of today, especially of those of women, are designed by males. I refuse to call them men in this sense. Manliness is a Virtue.
So in short, we men are to blame.
I agree that men are no men anymore, and that they should take the lead.
Nevertheless, we cannot deny the personal responsibility of each woman degrading herself. She is free. Moreover, she reacts badly at any attempt by men to restrain her bad tendencies.
Even without the presence of men, women still compete with each other. Even alone, the only thing they need is a mirror, and they give free reign to their vanity. In the "Story of a soul", st. Theresa of the Child Jesus explains very well this inherent weakness of females, and she doesn't blame men for it. She says that when she was 3 years old, the family went to the sea-side on vacation. In those days, of course, people remained fully dressed, men with ties and all that. Children were allowed to play with pebbles and walk in the water. She took off her little vest, because she thought she would look more pretty with her bare arms showing. Her mother scolded her and obliged her to cover her arms. She was THREE! (Of course there was no impurity there, just vanity).
Let us not forget this and excuse modern women. To their unshakeable vanity, they join a desire for money, and for the enslavement of men. Modern women are the real WMD. They should not be surprised if men react with insults (even if they should not).
Guess I pulled out the biggest brush for this one... I definitely was speaking in very general terms. I intended to portray the failure of men, in general, in regards to their civic duties. I wasn't trying to deny the fact of the effects of Original Sin in regards to women. I totally agree with you Patricius. Let me try to give a couple of examples of how I see how a manly leader would act... Putin recently outlawed ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs from demonstrating publicly, he arrested and imprisoned a group of feminists of a punk band after they protested at the main alter of the cathedral, Christ the Saviour. (They were primarily protesting the fact that Putin reunited "Church and State.") These were virtuous acts. So my point is, a virtuous leader tries to provide an environment which facilities virtue rather than vice. Hope this helps in clarifing what I was trying to get at in general.
-
.
So in short, we men are to blame.
Why all of a sudden the collective guilt friend?.
I compare our times to those of Lot. Lot was a Just man but was a member of a decadent society. Did this make Lot guilty? I assume not. For those of us who are striving to fulfill our duty of state, aren't we in like circuмstances to those of Lot?
-
Trump speaks on Rosie O'Donnell, speaking the truth.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d32577Hom08
:roll-laugh1:
I literally fell on the floor and laughed at him berate this lesbian tub of lard.
-
Was Trump inspired by Our Lord in St. Matthew's gospel...
[37] But let your speech be yea, yea: no, no: and that which is over and above these, is of evil. [38] You have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth. [39] But I say to you not to resist evil: but if one strike thee on thy right cheek, turn to him also the other: [40] And if a man will contend with thee in judgment, and take away thy coat, let go thy cloak also unto him.
...or someone else?
-
Trump speaks on Rosie O'Donnell, speaking the truth.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d32577Hom08
:roll-laugh1:
I literally fell on the floor and laughed at him berate this lesbian tub of lard.
He didn't actually mention anything worthy of condemnation. Surely he could have come up with 1 or 2.
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=64YhFQ99a-c
I know, how could Mr. Trump be so awful! He sure has some gall to insult a delicate little flower like Rosie.
Mind you, this is the woman (for lack of a better word) who said this about pro-lifers:
“I’d like to take my period blood I no longer have and write, ‘you’re all assh—s.’ I’d like to smear it all over some people’s faces.”
The video posted by the mod is an absolute joke.
-
Was Trump inspired by Our Lord in St. Matthew's gospel...
[37] But let your speech be yea, yea: no, no: and that which is over and above these, is of evil. [38] You have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth. [39] But I say to you not to resist evil: but if one strike thee on thy right cheek, turn to him also the other: [40] And if a man will contend with thee in judgment, and take away thy coat, let go thy cloak also unto him.
...or someone else?
Check out the log in your own eye.
-
Why would this OP be used to call out Trump, when the OP actually perpetuates the Jєωιѕн feminist agenda, false "misogyny" of America and "female victim" status?
-
Why would this OP be used to call out Trump, when the OP actually perpetuates the Jєωιѕн feminist agenda, false "misogyny" of America and "female victim" status?
Our Principles is a super PAC founded by Katie Packer (http://www.burningglassconsulting.com/our-team/). She was involved in Mitt Romney's campaign. She covered up an affair Rick Wiley had when he was Scott Walker's campaign manager. Her husband is Alexander Gage. She did not take his last name apparently.