Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Trump ok with Transgender mutilation for kids with parental consent  (Read 6980 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Pax Vobis

  • Supporter
Re: Trump ok with Transgender mutilation for kids with parental consent
« Reply #25 on: October 18, 2024, 09:11:56 AM »

Quote
Please provide information that shows me that a president could NOT at least put a moratorium on transgender surgeries for minors.
If the president could do pretty much anything by executive order, you don’t think Obama would’ve outlawed 90% of guns?  He wanted to, but couldn’t.  Because that’s not how our govt works.  Executive orders are for powers ALREADY POSSESSED BY THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH.  An executive order cannot legislate new laws/rules or judicate/decide legal battles.  Because these are outside the powers of the executive branch. 

Re: Trump ok with Transgender mutilation for kids with parental consent
« Reply #26 on: October 18, 2024, 09:21:18 AM »
It's like saying " I'm against cutting off your kid's arms, unless they have parental permission"

Some things are just objectively wrong and need more than a "weak" nod that maybe it's not a "good idea" ( and that's the extent of his involvement here)

It's no different than saying that getting an abortion for a teenager is acceptable with parental permission.  While the parental permission is warranted for any minor surgery, it does not nullify the evil of the act.  Trump is moving the Overton window step by step.
I understand and agree that it would be much better if things were EXPLICITLY said, but the only politicians I know who were explicit in social issues such as these were "social conservatives", and they never got nominated let alone elected.  In previous elections prior to 2016 when I didn't vote at all, I always voted in the primaries for the social conservative but was always left with the social moderates to vote for in the election.


Re: Trump ok with Transgender mutilation for kids with parental consent
« Reply #27 on: October 18, 2024, 09:52:50 AM »
I don't care who anyone votes for. They are just two lesser demons controlled by Satan. Take your pick. Kamala is a communist floozy that can barely speak, and Trump is a carnival barker that prays to the soul of Rebbi Schneerson in hell.

Let me ask you this. Were the "republicans" able to fix the fraudulent voting practices? Will there still be mail-in voting ? What happened to the Dominion lawsuits? Will there be ANYTHING different as far as licit voting going on this time as opposed to 2020?
 All I keep hearing is that Trump has to win by a supermajority to overide the fraud. All this tells me is that 4 years have passed and nothing was done except for pillowman to give me a special on sheets.
There is no excuse for this other than to keep the spectacle alive, and it sure is that.

Anyone who thinks that Trump actually has your interests in mind, is well, out of theirs.

The only reason I pick on Trump over Kamala is obvious. Trump is taking good people into such a state of compromise morally that I wonder what if anything he does will deter them- Abortion- OK, Melania- well that was a set up, IVF ,Gaza , LGBT somehow people have no problem overlooking these things because it's Trump. I can't.
 This is just a trap for your soul.
Trump isn't the swamp- he is quicksand.
Very well put. Trump socialized for decades with Epstein, Maxwell, the Clintons, Adelsons, etc and had no problem whatsoever with their policies or sɛҳuąƖ proclivities as he likely shared in both. He was mentored by none other than Roy Cohen, the Epstein of his era, and boasts about being the biggest gentile Zionist(shabbos goy) on the planet. 
Most of his grandchildren are Jєωιѕн and will inherit his empire. He has hitched his wagon to the joos because he wants his dynasty and brand to flourish in the world they presently control and the one they are fashioning for their messiah. He is not a deep or thoughtful man, rather a vain, shallow narcissist of the first order. 
During his first year as president I cut the man some slack given that he was new to politics and how DC worked. Then came one horrendous cabinet pick after another, but never to this day showing any humility, admitting to any mistake, always playing the victim. In reality though they were the right picks because he always had an excuse for why he couldn't get anything done. But hey, we did get lowest black unemployment ever!
Just as during the Bolshevik revolution and its aftermath there were contending factions of jews who disagreed about how to advance the revolution abroad. The trotskyites wanted a direct militaristic approach but the Gramsci plan to gradually capture the institutions of the West won out. The only difference between Republicans and Democrats is how fast to boil the frog in order to achieve the same ends. That gap is shrinking by the day as we see Trump leading the faithful to accept more and more compromises. Accept queer marriage and adoption, IVF, genocide in Gaza and maybe, just maybe you might get some tiny walkback on bump stocks or MS13 gangmembers running amok in your town

Re: Trump ok with Transgender mutilation for kids with parental consent
« Reply #28 on: October 18, 2024, 10:16:31 AM »
I understand and agree that it would be much better if things were EXPLICITLY said, but the only politicians I know who were explicit in social issues such as these were "social conservatives", and they never got nominated let alone elected.  In previous elections prior to 2016 when I didn't vote at all, I always voted in the primaries for the social conservative but was always left with the social moderates to vote for in the election.
 took such a strong and decisive stand vor
I don't think you can look at Trump as the average "moderate". He co-opted the Christian and Catholic right in 2016 and rightfully so, as the strongest pro-life presidential candidate we have ever had. That IS why he won (if you can trust any election.) We are the ones who got him over the finish line BECAUSE he took such decisive stands on moral issues that mattered, not in spite of it. It turned out to be a part of a larger plan to "capture" our demographic, and as Trump put it, " I could shoot somebody and not lose voters"- how true.

He really talked a good talk and seemed to be speaking truth to power.

Now he is banking on the past in keeping the conservative Christian and Catholic vote in check while currently throwing every conceivable wrench in our faces -" You have no where else to go". And so it seems.

He is essentially MORE evil than the average neo-con political hack because he is taking off the mask and showing us his true colors. He's no pro-lifer and has never been. We are seeing who he is and he is a world class zionist globalist player taking us down the path to Noahide slavery and worse, and we are still trying to convince ourselves that he "really doesn't mean it' and he will "save the day" somehow.

Remember , this is the man who gave us the beautiful shot and initiated the lockdowns. Don't tell me he was just naively manipulated. He was a major part of the plan.

Please.

If trump does win, and I think he will; everyone will be happy if he straightens out the economy a bit and everyone's 401K rises a few points, while Gazans, Lebanese and Syrians are being wiped off the face of the earth, babies continue to be slaughtered, old people euthanized  and the gαy flag waved proudly; but no one will say a thing because it's under Trump's watch and not the evil democrats: and life will continue to be great for Israel and the Jєω oligharchs stealing our hard earned wealth, just the way they like it

Re: Trump ok with Transgender mutilation for kids with parental consent
« Reply #29 on: October 18, 2024, 11:37:56 AM »
I don't think you can look at Trump as the average "moderate".
I wasn't trying to label Trump (and maybe he's not a moderate, but I still don't see him quite like hαɾɾιs). 

I was merely pointing out that, although it sure would be nice if they did, no politician speaks explicitly on the social issues other than social conservatives...who never get nominated nor elected.  I think it's a reflection of our liberalized society.  As a result, we're unfortunately left with those who don't speak explicitly and tend to play both sides in order to get elected.

I'm not looking to argue with you josefa.  I just wanted to make that point.