Yes, trolls abound. I got two down thumbs on page 1 simply for pointing out that people on this site spotted Marshall as a highly dubious character fully seven years ago. My mentioning Meg as an early spotter seems to have been viewed as especially unforgivable.
I don't particularly care about the whats and whys of people's likes and dislikes, but to my knowledge spitefulness has never been numbered among the saintly characteristics to which Catholics should aspire.
As for Archbishop Viganò, the attitude that the worth of his various published messages should be regarded as tainted because he has had what some consider questionable friendships and associations is uncomfortably redolent of a media-led "cancellation" of a celebrity who was seen in a store one day saying hello to a h0Ɩ0h0αx h0Ɩ0cαųst denier. Surely a Catholic should judge the messenger by his message; not the other way around. For that reason. so long as the archbishop continues to attack conciliarist traitors and speak up for the True Faith, he will have my support and applause.
Well said.
I, too, support Vigano. But not Opus Dei, or Taylor Marshall.
The only reason that I was an early spotter is that I happened to peruse a website several years ago, soon after the Fisher-More college disaster, in which someone at the college (I know not whom - the website didn't say) who was involved with the details of the situation, who said that Taylor Marshall, after turning in his resignation, asked for a large severance pay. Marshall said that he would keep quiet about the financial situation at FM, IF he would be given the severance pay, but he didn't get it. It was denied. So he went forward with his story about what went on at Fisher-More college. I haven't been able to find that website that told this story. It seems to have disappeared.
To be fair, Marshall does have a lot of children to support, and that may be his reason for sort of blackmailing the college, and wanting that severance pay. But still.....