There was only one footnote which worked, and the aforementioned non-working footnote link. The attack on Taylor Marshall was unfounded speculation. Prove me wrong.
You could table all the Opus Dei discussion and still contend with a man who insists on maintaining a public profile as a leading "traditional" Catholic voice when he should have sought a far more private life. A lot of things that a convert must contend with take a good deal of time to navigate through and one can hardly lead discussions when they're supposed to be focused on catching up.
I don't see the man being particularly conscientious or trepidatious in his meanderings with the occasional golden nugget as archived here about his "vision" of a pained woman with a milk-engorged bosom representing the Church:
http://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/2018/03/there-is-poison-in-mother-but-her-milk.htmlHis lack of honesty is more than abundantly clear when you consider how he was the man behind the Pachamama dunking (which suspiciously had zero repercussions) and not Alexander Tschugguel and that they had orchestrated the incident for what is looking more and more like a publicity stunt.
But back to Opus Dei for just a minute: He named one of his sons after Escriva.
Why is this so hard to take in? He OD'd as soon as he went NO. He only disavowed a week before the Pachamama incident. Now he's dumped Gordon for a more SSPX-aligned position? I have to be skeptical.
Most importantly, never forget how far the serpent will unhinge his jaw to wrap around large prey. Trad Catholics are a big prize to be won by the elites. They seem less interested in the outright destruction of their targets than the ability to absorb them whole. Less struggle that way!
Something is amiss.
I agree with Matthew AND Croixalist in the same day...
I guess even a broken clock is right twice a day.
Not if you can't take your eyes off the mirror!